Feds accused of pushing ‘utopias’ in wealthy neighborhoods with diversity regs

That is the headline.

What it really means is Obama and his cadre want to bring the ghetto to you. Look at Ferguson, that is what they want to create across the country so their agenda of civil unrest, government dependency, poverty, poor education etc is everywhere and there is no escaping it. Oh, and they get more votes in those so called "Utopias".

"[The rule] tells us how we can live, where we go to school, how we will vote, what this utopian type of neighborhood should look like," charged Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., who sponsored an amendment to the House HUD spending bill Wednesday, blocking any future funding for the new rule. The spending bill was passed in the House with the amendment.

Source

Can you smell what the "community organizer" is cookin?

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
That is the headline.

What it really means is Obama and his cadre want to bring the ghetto to you. Look at Ferguson, that is what they want to create across the country so their agenda of civil unrest, government dependency, poverty, poor education etc is everywhere and there is no escaping it. Oh, and they get more votes in those so called "Utopias".

"[The rule] tells us how we can live, where we go to school, how we will vote, what this utopian type of neighborhood should look like," charged Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., who sponsored an amendment to the House HUD spending bill Wednesday, blocking any future funding for the new rule. The spending bill was passed in the House with the amendment.

Source

Can you smell what the "community organizer" is cookin?

Won't property values drop along with the amount that the city council receives in property taxes?

originally posted by: stormcell

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
That is the headline.

What it really means is Obama and his cadre want to bring the ghetto to you. Look at Ferguson, that is what they want to create across the country so their agenda of civil unrest, government dependency, poverty, poor education etc is everywhere and there is no escaping it. Oh, and they get more votes in those so called "Utopias".

"[The rule] tells us how we can live, where we go to school, how we will vote, what this utopian type of neighborhood should look like," charged Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., who sponsored an amendment to the House HUD spending bill Wednesday, blocking any future funding for the new rule. The spending bill was passed in the House with the amendment.

Source

Can you smell what the "community organizer" is cookin?

Won't property values drop along with the amount that the city council receives in property taxes?

Yes, and expenses will go up so they'll have to increase taxes on those who do work to cover the loss.

originally posted by: stormcell

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
That is the headline.

What it really means is Obama and his cadre want to bring the ghetto to you. Look at Ferguson, that is what they want to create across the country so their agenda of civil unrest, government dependency, poverty, poor education etc is everywhere and there is no escaping it. Oh, and they get more votes in those so called "Utopias".

"[The rule] tells us how we can live, where we go to school, how we will vote, what this utopian type of neighborhood should look like," charged Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., who sponsored an amendment to the House HUD spending bill Wednesday, blocking any future funding for the new rule. The spending bill was passed in the House with the amendment.

Source

Can you smell what the "community organizer" is cookin?

Won't property values drop along with the amount that the city council receives in property taxes?

They would just suckle off the teet of the Federal Govt HUD monies, and follow along like good little minions or get the funds cut off.

Wanting communities to follow the the laws that were set in place back in the 60's the man should hang his head in shame. HUD is doing the right thing if these communities don't want to follow the law then they should cut off funding.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

Linked at the article:

HUD’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

Doesn't really affirm or deny Rep Gozar's take on it -- just a bunch of weasel words, actually, that can be interpreted and applied in many ways.

But we only have ourselves to blame in the final analysis, and the laws and policies we've allowed. As soon as we decided (collectively) that only some people deserve a place to live, and created and enforced policies that force too many people to fall through the cracks (hence, the high homeless population), we doomed ourselves... If only some people "deserve" a place to live, then the definition of "who" deserves a home, as well as "where" and "how" is subject to constant change according to those making the rules. Those who "deserve" a home today may not "deserve" a home tomorrow. If we don't protect and promote everyone's right to have a home, we are putting our own right to a home at jeopardy.

My question is: Will we learn this important truth before Fraudclosure II hits us upside the head???

originally posted by: buster2010
Wanting communities to follow the the laws that were set in place back in the 60's the man should hang his head in shame. HUD is doing the right thing if these communities don't want to follow the law then they should cut off funding.

But all those programs are wrapped in failure and corruption and Human misery.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: buster2010
Wanting communities to follow the the laws that were set in place back in the 60's the man should hang his head in shame. HUD is doing the right thing if these communities don't want to follow the law then they should cut off funding.

But all those programs are wrapped in failure and corruption and Human misery.

We were told that the great society would eliminate poverty, so the question arises, why demand following policies that have proved failures?

Great policies demand more. Long ago in a land far far away we lived in the hood and life was good in the hood. lots of free stuff just for complaining. Nobody tells you the truth on how to get rich but in the hood there's all kinds of info on how to get free stuff. Phones to food to disability you don't want to pay rent no problem . Would rather buy beer than pay your utilities no problem somebody will take care of you.



A real learning experience

They want to force well to do communities who do not partake of the HUD money trough, to conform to the system of government dependency.

Imagine the next time they manufacture some civil unrest scenario and try to make it nationwide like they have been attempting. Instead of a few outbursts in LA, Chicago, NY, they would get support for their theater performances popping up everywhere. If at first they don't succeed, try and try again. They would have sympathetic community organizers like that despicable Mayor in the Baltimore suburb fanning the fires everywhere.

Change you can believe in. A fundamental change in America is being attempted.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

America, what a country.
Destroying housing values one community at a time. But...not to worry. I've recently read of new "housing communities" one county removed from Atlanta, far outside any City limit where only spec homes are allowed. My guess is that all this will do is spur the next housing bubble in development of more ex-urban housing communities as white flight picks up its bags and moves again. Its an endless cycle of construction/destruction/new construction.

What better way to get people out of the ghetto than make everywhere a ghetto?

originally posted by: Mandroid7
What better way to get people out of the ghetto than make everywhere a ghetto?

The first ghettos were created by unscrupulous landlords who block-busted high quality apartment blocks and converted the comfortable apartments into bedsits and studio apartments, scared the residents into selling up, then crammed the buildings with as many people as possible. The extra wear and tear essentially demolished the building inside out, and rent controls meant that repairs were unaffordable, so the buildings were handed over to the city to maintain. Even the cities couldn't afford to maintain them so they were demolished and replaced with "projects" with wide hallways, elevators and central heating. What did the residents do? Invited all their relatives and friends to stay because of the extra space. Back to the beginning.

Is this going to be the third time round?

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: buster2010
Wanting communities to follow the the laws that were set in place back in the 60's the man should hang his head in shame. HUD is doing the right thing if these communities don't want to follow the law then they should cut off funding.

But all those programs are wrapped in failure and corruption and Human misery.

What isn't?