It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No not at all. Because christians believe in jesus. Which is rediculous.
Because you can say that with a straight face.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: Woodcarver
No not at all. Because christians believe in jesus. Which is rediculous.
How exactly is believing there was a man named Jesus and that he died and rose again three days later make you untrustworthy?
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: Isurrender73
A modern day parable, eh? The church needs new writers. That was terrible.
And Jesus was late to the party. There were already saviors who had come and died for the sins of mankind centuries before Jesus was born.
originally posted by: Isurrender73
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: Isurrender73
A modern day parable, eh? The church needs new writers. That was terrible.
And Jesus was late to the party. There were already saviors who had come and died for the sins of mankind centuries before Jesus was born.
The church doesn't agree with my parable. My parable was directed at the church, perhaps you missed the point.
The fact that people believe it does not prove that it is actually the case. Sorry. Your historical data is unreliable, untestable, and unbelievable.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: Woodcarver
I would say my view has more historical data supporting it than yours.
I understand your position very well, It's that nothing is possible without a god.
If you feel that such a simple concept as "personal responsibility" loses it's meaning without the inclusion of a god, then you're really not understanding the words.
Quite simply Personal means individual (no god), and Responsibility means the state of accountability (no god)... If you're suggesting that an 'individual state of accountability" requires a god to be accountable to, then you are adding a third idea to a very simple idea... which is quite simply I am accountable to myself and those around me.
In terms of placing intrinsic value on "life", there is no need to include the concept of an external creator, unless we are back to your very simple minded idea that "nothing is possible without a god". It
So far there is nothing that has been shown to be supernatural about life, and yes, life is as natural as a "rock floating through space".
a programmer doesn't monitor every bit of code as a program is running, just as if there is a god, it doesn't interact with the universe as it goes through its processes.
I understand how a god "may" exist at the start of it all, but you seem unwilling to make an effort to imagine how a god may not exist
A transcendent consciousness would be an entity with self-awareness that exist apart from, or outside of, what we call the material universe.
What kinds of things/beings can exist outside of the material universe?
Are thoughts and ideas things that exist outside the material universe, in your opinion?
Does a person's soul exist outside the material universe?
You could also say that I am attempting to appeal to you with a reductio ad absurdum. Its a form of argument in which you try to show something is true by simply showing that when it is denied you are left with an absurd or fallacious result.
Christian perspective: People have souls that are integrated in to biological hardware for lack of a better analogy. The soul is like the driver, and yes transcends the material world.
Unfortunately, you take some quantum leaps through your assumptions. like "God is good" for example.
I would describe the soul as a driver, that operates and gets in an out of vehicles, vehicles that are used to "go somewhere". The soul, an eternal entity, enters the vehicles of the body at birth and coexists within the body until death doth part the two.
The relationship between the body and the soul is like that of the "Christ" analogy. The "holy spirit" enters, consummates, marries the bride, the material body. The body is the temple, the church, the seat of Judah, the bride of Christ..........
The soul is the conscious transcendental being that willingly makes the sacrifice to descend from blissful perfection/source into the mundane material world of flesh and blood, destined to suffer and die and to experience death, just like "Christ". We are all "Christ"
I never used the word God nor have I mentioned Christianity at all. So it seems you are the one making assumptions.
Not being rude, but you need a little bit of work on your Christ analogy.
This is incoherent with atheism, you could get by with this as an agnostic, but not an atheist. To claim a soul exist an atheist would first have to explain how such a thing could come into being without an external source.
originally posted by: Dr1Akula
originally posted by: Isurrender73
Jesus paid for the sins you commit out of ignorance. Once you accept the Holy Spirit as your guide there is no place for willful sin in your life.
So the best deal would be to live a life full of sin, and just before you die accept the Holy spirit and ask for forgiveness!
there are saints accepted by the church who did exactly that
Imo this isn't moral at all, Just like the concept of sin isn't moral
I you are good just because being bad has consequences (sins) then you are not really a good person.
On the other hand when you are good without expecting a reward, (or a punishment of being bad) then you are truly a good person.
Nonetheless it was a nice story, but what I got from it, was the irony of sin
thanks for sharing...
Don't be coy. We all know you're a Christian working off the lead of William Lane Craig.
Just as "Christ" enter the world through a "virgin, so the soul enters, not through semen or sexual intercourse, but because of a willing sacrifice for love.
Nonsense. Belief in consciousness that exists beyond the physical body, that is an emanation of some natural expression of the universe is not dependent on belief in god(s)