This topic is in the Cryptozoology and Mythical Beasts discussion forum.  (rss)


Ever Notice This About The Patterson Film?


<<  1    2  >>



reply posted on 1-8-2003 @ 12:51 AM by Mycroft



Originally posted by mrmulder

Originally posted by James the Lesser
Could be a new alien.


That raises another questions. Does anyone believe that some sasquatch are actually alien visitors? I have read reports from witnesses who have seen sasquatch have also seen a UFO in the area shortly after spotting the creature.


We're being visited by Wookies?

Sorry, couldn't resist the joke.

My personal opinion is that the Patterson video is as good as the evidence can get without someone actually bringing one of the creatures out of the woods in a cage or on the hood of their car.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-8-2003 @ 10:29 AM by mrmulder



Originally posted by Mycroft

We're being visited by Wookies?

Sorry, couldn't resist the joke.

My personal opinion is that the Patterson video is as good as the evidence can get without someone actually bringing one of the creatures out of the woods in a cage or on the hood of their car.




Hey that's okay. I thought it was pretty funny myself. Anyways, I still believe in bigfoot whether it's alien or not.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-8-2003 @ 03:12 PM by BIGFOOT

FAKE

I bielieve in bigfoot and everything but i think this is a fake.Click on the link and look at the top 2 pictures.THERE BOTH THE SAME ONE!!look at the way the light hits them, look at the spot the foot goes into the water, pick any mark on the close one and you can find on the one thats far away.This tells me that patterson is a DEFINATE FAKE



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 06:50 PM by kurtcobainuk


i agree with james the lesser all the way scientists arent always right you know!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-9-2003 @ 01:37 AM by THENEO


Really its all just mass delusion.
I think it's the fluoride in the water.
I mean how could people in dozens of countries for many years on many occasions describe the same beast and possibly have seen anything?

They simply were all smoking the same peyote the same way!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-9-2003 @ 04:16 AM by EWom




Originally posted by William
I think the walk in the film is too human... with far too many human tendencies... like arm swinging, minimal shifting of weight, etc. I've heard this before from anthropologists studying the "creature's" walk and tend to agree.



Uhm.. everything I've seen and read, (and it's been alot) has disagreed with you. The majority say that it would be very hard for a person to duplicate that walk enough to pull off the hoax. Even the hoax debunkers I saw who claimed they could do it, went out and did it, and their expensive suit (I think it was Fox that provided the money for this) looked horrible, and their proffesional who was supposed to recreate the walk, didn't even come close to looking as convincing. If it was a hoax, why can nobody reproduce in a way that looks at all real?

And to BIGFOOT:

Yeah, it is the same pic, it's called a close-up.
The bigfoot isn't walking in water, it is walking on ground.. behind a bunch of tree's and other brush that tends to pile up on river banks.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-9-2003 @ 04:24 AM by EWom





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-9-2003 @ 04:30 AM by WolfofWar


I don't know if anybody realises this but Patterson admitted on his deathbed a few years back that he faked the footage and it's not real. He said he was in the suit while his son filmed it.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-9-2003 @ 07:48 AM by EWom


Uh no, patterson said on his deathbed, that it was real. Later his family decided to come out of nowhere and say it was a fake.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-9-2003 @ 10:20 AM by John Nada


When Patterson died not long ago he instructed his relatives before he died to confess that it was a hoax. That's the end of that, it was a fake, he just didn't want to admit it whilst he was alive.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-9-2003 @ 05:31 AM by triplesod



Originally posted by James the Lesser
Could be a new alien. Or maybe a NWO project. Pump soilders full of stuff to make their feet big, send them somewhere and see if the ladies in that country believe the saying "People with big feet have big d*(k$"

Never know, they could have been getting bored one day, or smoked a bong full of fruit loops one morning and came up with it.



yeah, nice one






reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-9-2003 @ 01:01 PM by THENEO


Yeah look at all the money and fame that people are gettin' all over the world faking all this shyte!

that's why none of it is real.

there is just so much profit in faking it.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:
































ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.004 seconds
Page processed in 0.101 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread