Originally posted by William
I think the walk in the film is too human... with far too many human tendencies... like arm swinging, minimal shifting of weight, etc. I've heard
this before from anthropologists studying the "creature's" walk and tend to agree.

Uhm.. everything I've seen and read, (and it's been alot) has disagreed with you. The majority say that it would be very hard for a person to
duplicate that walk enough to pull off the hoax. Even the hoax debunkers I saw who claimed they could do it, went out and did it, and their expensive
suit (I think it was Fox that provided the money for this) looked horrible, and their proffesional who was supposed to recreate the walk, didn't even
come close to looking as convincing. If it was a hoax, why can nobody reproduce in a way that looks at all real?
And to BIGFOOT:
Yeah, it is the same pic, it's called a close-up.
The bigfoot isn't walking in water, it is walking on ground.. behind a bunch of tree's and other brush that tends to pile up on river banks.