The idea that the family came forward and said that Paterson told them to disclose that is was a fake after he died has less evidence then the video
does. I mean you can tell in the video that stride is too large for a average human, could not be recreated by experts 40 years later vs. a dead guy
told me to tell you. IMO that just has not weight to it.
So that leaves us at the stride and costume. Well Paterson could have traveled the world and found a 7' 3 1/2" tall individual to fill the suit and
then created the video. (Which in the report below you will see is the required height for the stride but the continued forward motion/posture is not
feasible for a human) Remember this was in the 60's so it is not like he just jumped on the internet or anything. He would of had to put a lot of
time and effort into this. Then the suit. It was attempted to be recreated and the "quality" was unable to be matched. So we are to believe that
somebody created a suit 40 years ago that we cannot create today? I mean we are more advanced now then we were then, right?
Here is a link the NASI Report on the Patterson Film from www.pattersonfilm.com
www.pattersonfilm.com...
What is it about people demanding we give them proof but then tell us we are wrong without offering any proof to the contrary? (not pointed at any
specific individual, more of a general statement)
[edit on 24-9-2009 by KFISHCC]
[edit on 24-9-2009 by KFISHCC]