posted on Jun, 14 2015 @ 02:37 AM
originally posted by: nOraKat
Anyway, so up to 1820, because of King George III, I reason the same power structure ruled both The Holy Roman Empire and the United Kingdom of Great
I tried to explain to you, and I will try again, that George III did NOT rule over the Holy Roman Empire. He ruled one fragment of it. The house of
Hohenzollern in Prussia ruled another fragment. The house of Hapsburg in Austria ruled an even larger fragment.
Let me offer a modern parallel.
NATO is a loose organisation composed of many countries, including the U.S.A, Canada, Italy, Turkey, and so on.
Now supposing, by some odd chance, the Sultan of Dubai was elected President of Turkey. You could then argue, I suppose, that "the same power
structure" was ruling both Dubai and Turkey. But it would be a massive and absurd leap to argue that the Sultan of Dubai had become the ruler of NATO.
"But Turkey is part of NATO, right? So if he rules Turkey, he rules NATO".
That's exactly the logic you are using when you ramp up "ruling a fragment of Germany" into "ruling Germany".
I can't imagine too much has changed since then. There's not very much time between 1820 and the 1900's.
Then, for heaven's sake, get to know some history. Learn how much change can happen in the LONG period of time occupied by a century or so of
For a start, you don't seem to be aware that the Holy Roman Empire had been abolished long before George III died. Napoleon did it.
Get to know some history. Find some real books, instead of relying on internet articles and building up imaginary structures on isolated details.