It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crustyjuggler27
a reply to: EA006
i love reading about things that i otherwise wouldn't. but at the heart of this one is that our military can build/operate/maintain a base on mars in secret. how many thousands of people would be required to achieve this? where do they get the personnel? how do they keep them silent if they are allowed to return? if we want to speculate i would imagine (if there is a base) it would be manned by slaves taken from 3rd world countries overseen by only a few military persons.
originally posted by: EA006
originally posted by: TrueMessiah
The constant attack on Project Camelot is downright laughable. Why on Earth would some choose to attack/shoot the messenger? They are only an outlet for whistleblowers/ex officials/researchers etc. to get their story out. Geez. If that's supposed to be some kind of discrediting tactic then a better job needs to be done.
What's the point in joining a conspiracy website to debunk other potential conspiracies? Why are they actually here?
This happens quite a lot I've noticed.
Specifically Masonic and UFO threads seem to rattle cages.....
25 Rules of Disinformation
Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the "play dumb" rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or WITHHELD, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
originally posted by: TrueMessiah
Agreed.
It's counterintuitive and counterproductive towards sorting out what could be possibly taking place.
It does happen quite a lot as you mentioned, and I'm sure there are some who are genuinely skeptical but overall, the amount of debunking that we see on a daily basis is very telling coming from a conspiracy site. Perhaps there are those who don't want the truth to get out so they discredit everything (no matter what or where the source is from) that is presented in effort to sway those who haven't really studied extensively into these subjects into a denial outlook. And then these same people turn around and ask for more proof as if what's presented isn't good enough, meanwhile ignoring the covert nature involved. It's reminiscent of one of the prime disinformation tactics, #19 out of 25 to be exact, and I see it all the time:
If there ever was such a operation like suppressing or deterring the truth in effect like that, then it would be wise to try and curb that "rattling of cages" because like you said, it's very noticeable, and if you and I can detect it, then I know there are others who can as well. It's not a good look.
originally posted by: EA006
What's the point in joining a conspiracy website to debunk other potential conspiracies?
originally posted by: stuthealien
except gary mckinnon the hacker also states the u.s has off world ships, gary mckinnon
so now we have unrelated people in different countries claiming the u.s has a undisclosed space force,
so just debunking project camalot is not enough
Is McKinnon’s claim to have seen evidence of a UFO cover-up in a NASA building credible? In short, no. Viewing an image over a remote connection in 4bit colour will certainly make it impossible to see any rivets, and will make it difficult to tell an artist’s impression of a satellite from a UFO. Perhaps McKinnon’s notoriously excessive marijuana use at the time had something to do with his over-excitement at the “flickering” image on the screen?
While McKinnon has repeatedly stated that he knows the US military is hiding free energy away, it’s unclear exactly how he knows. It is most likely that his hacking exploits found no evidence of free energy, and that he was spurred on by conspiracy theories to try and uncover more information.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: Bedlam
Exactly.
If this sort of thing was "disclosure", it wouldn't be done by a lowly captain.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: stuthealien
Ah yes. Good ol Gary. The man who saw a lot but doesn't have one bit of...well...anything to back it up. Didn't think to print anything, even though he says it's exactly what he was looking to find, because he was "bedazzled."
originally posted by: stuthealien
a reply to: Shamrock6
except the america hate campaign and calls for extradition for meerly hacking..is pretty much proof in itself.
extradition for murder yes but not this.
mckinnon extradition blocked
unlucky , thank god the american machine can be stopped sometimes.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: crustyjuggler27
Of course we would bitch if you shut down Disneyland and gave us free run of the place.
Why?
No civilian women.
Duh
originally posted by: stuthealien
a reply to: DelMarvel
that was the only way to block it legally,he is a asset to our country and we protect our assets ,but he is just one more link of the puzzle
of the well known but denied space force