New Bigfoot Video, real or fake?

a reply to: micpsi


I admit it. I am prejudice against Bigfoot. I do not believe they belong in the workplace not should they vote. I'm a bad bad man.

I always loved the idea of using a mini zeppelin for stealth reconnaissance for cryptid research. Guess I was ahead of my time ; ) Seriously, though most people are too noisy in the woods and the vast back country can be covered more effectively by a stealth platform in the air, just drift without power with the currents over prime real estate using heat seeking and long range and night vision systems. I'm surprised that no one has used spy or mapping satellites for cryptid hunting as some have a resolution down to six inches and are capturing remote lands world wide on a daily basis. A few weeks viewing this type of material could be very productive accounting for the right environments and correct time of day and year for maximum animal activity.

a reply to: Cogito, Ergo Sum

Terrible...

looks very fake.


a reply to: starswift

originally posted by: spirit_horse
And the whole 10 second delay seems ridiculous.

It is, have a look at the trigger times of these, the slowest one was 1.38 seconds....

www.trailcampro.com...

Actually their cheapest camera, $79.95 has a trigger time of 1.5 seconds... so his video is bull#.

a reply to: starswift

i think i have just been click baited

but seriously - the T&C of ATS does not permit me to fully vent my disdain at the steaming pile of bovive excremental biomass you used as your OP " source "

a reply to: starswift

and on the tipic of motion sensors , 2 issues :

1 - citation required for a model of game cam with a 10 second delay

2 - look at the set up - every single just of wind - the tent will flap and trigger the cam

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: starswift

and on the tipic of motion sensors , 2 issues :

1 - citation required for a model of game cam with a 10 second delay

Just noticed he mentioned the model of his camera on his video - trigger time 1.5 seconds, so why claim 10 seconds?

originally posted by: starswift
What do you think?

Completely and utterly faked, as if by a high schooler.

a reply to: Blue Shift

don't tell me you've found the suit in Walmart Mr Shift , someone should take them to task

funbox

Lolololol that is so fake. I won't even attempt to argue why I think it's fake because it should be very obvious to anyone with common sense.

a reply to: hellobruce

the stupidity of hoaxers makes out lives easier ?

I always find Big foot and Loch Ness the Yeti, difficult to place as some ancient leftover. IMO this could be maybe visitors from space who sometimes visit their hideouts in deep forrest or on high mountains or far below where humans can't come that often .

Maybe they get spotted sometimes when they're around.

Wow, that's a lot of 'fake" claims with little to no reason. Biased, people? Come on! Some folks need to admit that they will automatically call "fake" to any and all Bigfoot videos, no matter what, and stop wasting thread space posting the same brief little denials.

In the entire batch of "fake" claimers, only three reasons were given:

One, the person taking the video is claimed to be a fraud. If that is the case, post some links and information, instead of just expecting us to take your word for it. Why, exactly, is he considered a fraud? Be specific, and be fair.

Two, the tent flap was open. Well, duh? The camera was inside the tent, which IS concealed, somewhat, from those outside the tent, especially at night. Plus, I have seen a tent sit open all day long, with people gone, and bugs all over. I wouldn't do it, but some do. Assuming that means the video is fake is a lame reason.

Three, the time delay claim. He says ten seconds, but the speed it's moving is fast enough that a couple would place it where we see it come in, so I assume that's just a mistake in stating the actual delay.

Now, with all of that set aside, how about what we actually see? The head shape is good, with the somewhat conical top so familiar from the PG film. The arms seem a bit long for 'a person in a suit. The size isn't as big as some reports, but they aren't all big. With all we see, some professional analysis seems like a good idea. Someone to check the measurements and proportions, the gait, etc, and also video specialists to determine if this is on site footage, or CGI/green screen sort of stuff. Watching it, it's intriguing enough to warrant that much.

But, hey, yell "fake", and assume it's all hoaxes. The Indians were all hoaxing, too, in their reports and stories of these creatures, too, right?

Seems a little too convenient that there was a 10 second delay for the game cam, so that only the creature's departure was captured. Apparently the contents of the tent were so mundane that it left after a cursory look around.

originally posted by: StarsComeOut
Seems a little too convenient that there was a 10 second delay for the game cam,

The model he used had a 1.5 second delay, not 10 seconds....

a reply to: hellobruce
I am sorry to tell you that you are wrong. The cam is a Moultrie. From their product description on their website "MOTION DETECT DELAY

Delay is a low-power "sleep" state entered after image capture. Longer delays extend battery life and limit the images recorded in high-traffic situations (e.g. – on a very busy game feeder). The camera can be set for 5, 10, or 30 second delays as well as 1, 5, 10, or 30 minute delays."

originally posted by: StarsComeOut
a reply to: hellobruce
I am sorry to tell you that you are wrong.

You are the one wrong here.... did you even read what you wrote?

"Delay is a low-power "sleep" state entered after image capture"

You must have missed the "after image capture"!

The trigger speed on the A-5 (1.16 seconds) is actually pretty good for this camera.

www.trailcampro.com...

So as you can see it is not 10 seconds, but 1.16 seconds! The person who made the video lied.

This immediately made me picture bad graphics from an old video game. Funny stuff.

Anything on Bigfoot evidence is fake.