It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Forensick
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Forensick
Russia invaded Crimea before ANY votes (illegal votes) occurred. That is an invasion.
Please explain - If Putin feels he had a moral imperative to invade Crimea then why did he do it by lying? Why did he maintain there were no Russian troops in Crimea and that the non insignia troops were not Russian?
Why did he then announce they were Russians troops, including the non insignia troops, in Crimea after the illegal occupation and annexation?
he did this because he knew he was invading a sovereign nation and that his justification would not work.
But this thread is about pro-Russian separatists naming Crimea part of Ukraine. I didn't come here to listen to the details of the Crimea invasion, annexation or whatever, there are many posts I can read about.
This interested me but you are ruining it.
Start your own thread or resurrect one of many.
What is the importance of the op?
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
Seems like that earlier add for Ukrainian and Russian speaking people to do some work for DOD are getting their messages out .I am sure Moscow will get a chuckle out of this and we may even here this new news repeated at the press brefing from the State Dept . It is after all coming from social media :>)
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: Forensick
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Forensick
Russia invaded Crimea before ANY votes (illegal votes) occurred. That is an invasion.
Please explain - If Putin feels he had a moral imperative to invade Crimea then why did he do it by lying? Why did he maintain there were no Russian troops in Crimea and that the non insignia troops were not Russian?
Why did he then announce they were Russians troops, including the non insignia troops, in Crimea after the illegal occupation and annexation?
he did this because he knew he was invading a sovereign nation and that his justification would not work.
But this thread is about pro-Russian separatists naming Crimea part of Ukraine. I didn't come here to listen to the details of the Crimea invasion, annexation or whatever, there are many posts I can read about.
This interested me but you are ruining it.
Start your own thread or resurrect one of many.
What is the importance of the op?
This IS his thread.
And if Crimea is back with Ukraine that is good. Now Russia just has to take back Ukraine and thhey get them both without dispute. Back to normal.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: mortex
Logical fallacy.
No one says RT only posts lies.
No one says western media only posts truth.
What we say is that RT is State owned and tends to say whatever helps Russia/Putin and is less reliable. It's a fact
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: MALBOSIA
And Poland,Rumania ,Czechkloslovakia and Germany TOO right?
russia-insider.com...
“MOSCOW. June 10 (Interfax) - The self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics have decided to revoke additional amendments to the Ukrainian constitution mentioning Crimea and Sevastopol, which they presented to the Trilateral Contact Group two days ago, the Donetsk news agency has said.
“There is no doubt, the DPR and the LPR regard Crimea as a part of Russia. Moreover, our republics think it would be ideal to join the Russian Federation,” said the report quoting the DPR and LPR negotiators, Denis Pushilin and Vladislav Deinego, as saying.
The negotiators reiterated the validity of the other amendments.
“The mention of Crimea in the draft amendments we have proposed to individual articles of the current Ukrainian constitution has a purely technical and legal meaning; this mention does not have any substantive significance for the simple reason that Crimea is not and cannot be a subject of the Minsk negotiations. We suggest that Ukraine should accept the other amendments immediately,” the report said.
I don't believe for one second you believe that .Just like the Syrian people cant have a leader not beholden to Washington's dictates or Libya or Iran or many others that have been destroyed . Heck even a former French politician claims that all European countries have to walk the Washington line . One compared it to giving a BJ .
The Russian people can elect whomever they wish.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Russian media is in fact state owned.