It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What Year Did You Stop Your Cognitive Dissonance Towards The 9/11 OS ?

page: 2
37
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 11:26 AM
link   
/a reply to: Blue_Jay33

The day it happened I thought that there was way to much coincidence involved for this to be a terrorist attack. Never before that day had a skyscraper caught on fire and fell like that, and 3 fell the same day, from fire? And even then, the likelihood of them all 3 falling onto their own "footprints"?

Then all the media reports just seemed choreographed and scripted, there was this one guy, that they interviewed that had all the answers and the first building had just fallen? And that BBC report telling us building 7 had collapsed before it had and then showing it falling afterward.

So many things that day set off red flags I never had any doubt. The plane that hit the Pentagon? The plane that went down in Pennsylvania? The planes that hit the Trade Center? Where were all the pieces? Every plane crash ever documented before that day had wreckage, even the ones that went into the side of a mountain, unless they crashed into the water, that is a different ball game.

Anyone that believes/believed the official version of these events is/was in a very serious state of denial.




posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 11:30 AM
link   
My suspicions were first raised when the Fox News reporter on site stated that the plane that hit the building had no windows. My suspicions were further raised when they found a hijacker's passport intact, but not the black boxes.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 11:30 AM
link   
I think it was false flag. In my country is a myth or a saying that majority of Americans are not well educated and they don't know geology very good. So i think government could easy invade, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Israel. It is the same, all those countries are somewhere there...

Joke mode off:
When i saw it i was very sad and it was not anywhere in my mind that this could be inside job. But after i realize how the system works and whoa re the big players, everything makes sense. I dont even need to bother with tehnicality. I just need to see them and what are they goals and i know that you my USA friends were tricked.

And right now the same trick n treat game is played with ISIS and Ukraine and god knows who else (Iran?, China?)

I just hope you will protest if you go to new false flag war.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 11:31 AM
link   
I thought it stunk from the very beginning, but I fully expected the attack to be blamed on "homegrown terrorists" with a full on invasion of Idaho as a result.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 11:35 AM
link   
I'd say a few months after it happened. While reading about it I found out about building 7 and was intrigued how it received almost zero publicity. At that point I knew something was up...



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 11:51 AM
link   
By the time the 2nd plane hit. My dad worked for the airlines for 30 years in communications. I was asking questions and debunking what was being reported right away. My dads company is now owned by the Carlyle Group. Interesting.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 12:08 PM
link   
The day it happened, one of the Pennsylvania papers (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette?) reported that there was a wreckage trail eight miles long from Flight 93.

Whoops.

(As an aside, at the time I had a close friend working as a grounds keeper at a golf course outside of Berryville, VA. It turned out he witnessed two fighter aircraft moving NW with "their pedals to the firewall.")

I was suspicious immediately (who knew an open-air kerosene fire could do so much damage to structural steel of that stripe?), but Flight 93 was the lead-pipe cinch.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 12:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: RoScoLaz4
never experienced any. knew from the moment the first tower fell that something was rotten in denmark.



agreed, here's a website showing a glassblower holding a "steel" blowpipe with his bare hands which are only 4 to 5 feet away from the 1100 to 2000 degree hot end....
entertainment.howstuffworks.com...

now logically, steel girders that held up the WTC towers, could not have all collapsed at nearly free fall speed, simply because the rest of the building girders (the lower, and thus physically farther away metal beams) would have been much cooler. this would result in a haphazard, and much slower collapse...or... only a partial collapse around the intensively-heated, initial-impact, areas of the building.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 12:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
My suspicions were first raised when the Fox News reporter on site stated that the plane that hit the building had no windows. My suspicions were further raised when they found a hijacker's passport intact, but not the black boxes.


Yeah they quoted a guy in Brooklyn, about 2 1/2 miles away

Now trying seeing windows on a plane from several miles away moving at 500 mph......

Unless Superman with X Ray vision not going to happen......



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

It was around 2005 that I began to wonder. Ironically I was still in the USN working in military intelligence alone in a SCIF watching "Loose Change" on the internet killing time on a long 12 hour watch.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills




watching "Loose Change" on the internet killing time on a long 12 hour watch.

Which version?


A quote from Avery a year ago.


“People aren’t meant to walk away thinking ‘inside job,’” Avery says, “but rather that 9/11 was a terrible tragedy that deserved a proper investigation, not the one we got.”


Another quote.


“In my truly angry times, in 2005 or 2006, if you asked if the Bush administration planned the attacks, I would have said, ‘# yeah’.”

But now?

“I don’t think Bush could plan a bowl of cereal,” he says.

edit on 7-6-2015 by samkent because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: samkent

The original I guess? When did it come out? In any case, after watching it I began to wonder and still do to this day, hence my last thread on the subject, Either 9/11 Was An Inside Job Or Complete Morons Ran Our Country.
edit on 7-6-2015 by Swills because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 12:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Ksihkehe

I think the Iraq part was the results of what someone called the shock doctrine .911 sent every one into shock and so all or the majority of people were unable to respond while in that state . The majority were fed the 24/7 cycle of that day and it took a long while to come out of it .



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
2003, maybe 4. I was at a friends house, his wife, a College Professor and Professional Opera Singer, asked to come into the TV room where she had David Ray Griffin on (C-Span?) with his account of what went down on 9/11. She was already wise to things, but my jaw hit the floor, it changed my life, like I guess it was supposed to do.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 03:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

From day 1 there were oddities, but I'm not an American, so, meh.

It wasn't important. Just another particularly war-mongering colonial power looking for some self justification.

(Look ma, they are burning the Reichstag, again!)


edit on 7/6/2015 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 05:13 PM
link   
Don't know when exactly, but it was perhaps a year or two later when I saw Larry Silverstein (owner of WTC) on film stating that he told the fire chief to "pull" building 7!

What ! how?
How do you accomplish a controlled demolition within hours on a 47-story skyscraper, especially one that's on fire? Doesn't it take weeks of planning and placement of hundreds of charges set, by specialists, to ignite in a complex and precise pattern in order to demolish it neatly into it's own footprint?

I say it would not be possible and, even if it were, why would anyone be expecting the chief of firemen to do it? Is that even a part of his job?

The whole thing seemed fishy. Even more so when it came out that Silverstein had increased the insurance before 911.
edit on 7-6-2015 by spodokomodo because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

I expect anybody outside of the US to have much less cognitive dissonance on this topic, other than it's hard to believe segments of the American government would plan a mass killing of it's own civilians just for propaganda purposes. If you look at previous false flags, they involved just military targets which meant military causalities, or just buildings getting burnt up. That day they combined the two.
edit on 7-6-2015 by Blue_Jay33 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 05:30 PM
link   
The day it happenend they interviewed Rummie on United93 (which was still in the air at that time) he said he gave orders to shoot the plane down.

Just minutes later they announced U93 crashed, and a couple of minutes again Rummie: I never gave the shootdown order.

That moment it started to smell fishy.
But i had no idea how stinky it will get.
And yes, 9/11 brought me to ATS, so there was atleast one good thing about



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 06:10 PM
link   
When there was no wreckage of 93 or at the Pentagon.
edit on 7-6-2015 by haven123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 06:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Ksihkehe

Because apparently they didn't even need to, people bought the invasion of both Iraq and Afghanistan regardless of the nationality of the high jackers.



new topics

top topics



 
37
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join