It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Are our rovers truly on Mars?

page: 2
9
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: VoidHawk




Radio signals can be easily faked, even direction!

How would one go about faking a radio signal from the direction of Mars?


Bounce a signal off Mars?




posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: VoidHawk

Prove to me that is possible. reliable, and will fool the world.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:24 PM
link   
Could this help in proving it? I do not know of anywhere else in the solar system we could actually film this.
I guess it could be fake, but hell, why?

Curiosity sees Phobos and Deimos Eclipse



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:26 PM
link   
a reply to: VoidHawk


Bounce a signal off Mars?
You'd need a pretty damned snazzy rig to receive that signal.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

i imagine a satellite system would be cheaper then a Mars rover. Just because of the amount of satellites in space, vs. the amount of rovers.


So, can anyone show some evidence that NASA has rovers on Mars?



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Psykotik




So, can anyone show some evidence that NASA has rovers on Mars?

Nope.
You win. Want a cookie?



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Psykotik

Can you show evidence that they don't?



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jonjonj
Could this help in proving it? I do not know of anywhere else in the solar system we could actually film this.
I guess it could be fake, but hell, why?

Curiosity sees Phobos and Deimos Eclipse


Obviously its CGI from a secret team at ILM that they transmitted and bounced off of Mars.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:28 PM
link   
You know what sucks?
People are out there that said the moon landings were hoaxed and now that we have photos from multiple countries showing the landers and rovers.... they still say it was hoaxed.

We will never be rid of them.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: VoidHawk


Bounce a signal off Mars?
You'd need a pretty damned snazzy rig to receive that signal.

Depends on the strength of the original signal.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:28 PM
link   
a reply to: VoidHawk

Yes, yes it does.
You get a cookie too.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: VoidHawk

Prove to me that is possible. reliable, and will fool the world.

Quite weak signals bounce all the way around the entire earth, just ask any radio operater. Unlike on earth signals in space travel unhindered.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Psykotik
a reply to: Krakatoa

i imagine a satellite system would be cheaper then a Mars rover. Just because of the amount of satellites in space, vs. the amount of rovers.


So, can anyone show some evidence that NASA has rovers on Mars?


Then they spent millions of $$ to design, yest, build two rovers only to not send them to the place for which they are specifically designed? And to add to that the EDL systems too? And the launch systems?

For what reason?

PS: You still failed to tell us about this cost savings.....I await with baited breath.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:31 PM
link   
How do I know YOU exist?



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:31 PM
link   
a reply to: VoidHawk


Quite weak signals bounce all the way around the entire earth, just ask any radio operater.
And there is no way to locate their source.



Unlike on earth signals in space travel unhindered.

Except for that pesky inverse squared rule.

edit on 6/6/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:32 PM
link   
What is the proof that would convince you?

Also where do you think this site is on earth they are using?



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: VoidHawk

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: VoidHawk

Prove to me that is possible. reliable, and will fool the world.

Quite weak signals bounce all the way around the entire earth, just ask any radio operater. Unlike on earth signals in space travel unhindered.


And they travel a lot (A LOT) further....by orders of magnitude (x2 for a round trip).



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: VoidHawk

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: VoidHawk

Prove to me that is possible. reliable, and will fool the world.

Quite weak signals bounce all the way around the entire earth, just ask any radio operater. Unlike on earth signals in space travel unhindered.


Try punching the numbers into the basic radar equation, see what you get for results.

I think you're going to be amazed at the ridiculous non-feasibility of it.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: VoidHawk

Yes, yes it does.
You get a cookie too.


You'd also have to know how to use the kit.
(Can I have a biscuit too?)



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 08:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
And there is no way to locate their source.

But we're discussing a signal coming from the direction of mars.



Except for that pesky inverse squared rule.
That brings us back to the strength of the original signal



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join