It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Climate change the coming Ice Age .

page: 6
11
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 12:55 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

What does politics have to do with having an opinion on AGW?




posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 12:58 AM
link   
a reply to: jrod



I agree phage has a hard on against man-made climate change deniers. Please show anywhere in my OP where I took that position. Phage immediately came on here and change the game away from the OP. Just as you have done among several other people .



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: c0gN1t1v3D1ss0nanC3
a reply to: introvert

What does politics have to do with having an opinion on AGW?


Quite a bit.

Some people of a particular political persuasion refuse to look at the issue objectively because their political bend will not allow it.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:02 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

So you are saying that most republicans deny AGW, and most democrats support AGW?



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:03 AM
link   
a reply to: c0gN1t1v3D1ss0nanC3

I don't think anyone supports AGW. I don't. I think it's bad.


edit on 6/7/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Haha you responded quickly to that...you come up with anything to back up your claims yet Phage?

I see that you lost the intelligent argument, so you have reverted back to rhetorical nonsense.

AGW = man made global warming and you could deduce it also stand for the theory that supports it exists.

Thanks though Phage...I love to see your true colors come out!



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:08 AM
link   
a reply to: c0gN1t1v3D1ss0nanC3



Thanks though Phage...I love to see your true colors come out!

Yeah, well. After 6 or 7 years that sort of happens.

edit on 6/7/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: c0gN1t1v3D1ss0nanC3
a reply to: introvert

So you are saying that most republicans deny AGW, and most democrats support AGW?


I don't speak in absolutes if I can help it, but your post would definitely indicate a pattern may be emerging.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

What happens? You stop talking when you lose an argument?

Very mature Phage.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:11 AM
link   
a reply to: c0gN1t1v3D1ss0nanC3
Your "true colors" sort of come out. Like you said. But it happens pretty quickly.

After a while you also learn that there are no arguments won or lost here.



edit on 6/7/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:11 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Ahh okay thanks for clearing that up.

Generalizing groups of people is bad for your health mmkay?



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Well when you choose which arguments to have, when to have them, and if they are even open for debate, you stand a good chance of feeling that way.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: c0gN1t1v3D1ss0nanC3
a reply to: introvert

Ahh okay thanks for clearing that up.

Generalizing groups of people is bad for your health mmkay?


Is this really what ATS has come to?

Instead of refuting a position or argument, we respond like a high school cheerleader?

Perhaps if I used lol in my response, as was used in the OP, I'd have a bit more credibility.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:22 AM
link   
a reply to: c0gN1t1v3D1ss0nanC3

Can you please stop attacking a member and stay on topic.
The topic is not phage.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:23 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

ad hominem attacks already?

I didn't realize standing up against the generalizing of groups of people was worthy of such a response.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:24 AM
link   
a reply to: boymonkey74

How am I attacking phage? I was just referred to as responding like a high school cheerleader, yet I am the bad guy?



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:25 AM
link   
a reply to: c0gN1t1v3D1ss0nanC3

Says the guy who wrote this:


originally posted by: c0gN1t1v3D1ss0nanC3
a reply to: jrod

Says the guy who thinks people should be punished criminally for having an opposing opinion.


Are you guys going to contribute anything to this discussion, or just continue to trash this thread with mindless dribble?



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:26 AM
link   
a reply to: jrod

Are you saying you haven't said that in other threads? I will gladly link your own comments for you if you need it.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:33 AM
link   
a reply to: jrod

Again with the ad hominem attacks...you, phage, and introvert have all done the same thing to me. I didn't realize that pointing out something you said was mindless dribble.

Knowing that someone who is arguing against you thinks you should go to jail for having that viewpoint is a pretty important thing IMO.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 01:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: c0gN1t1v3D1ss0nanC3
a reply to: introvert

ad hominem attacks already?

I didn't realize standing up against the generalizing of groups of people was worthy of such a response.


I did not attack your character whatsoever. What I did attack was your tactics and I believe that your responses were not only lacking in substance, they were arrogant and lacking tact.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join