It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Genetic Study Suggests the Pharaohs of Egypt Were Alien Hybrids

page: 4
25
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
a reply to: sled735

I still believe that aliens have visited Earth long ago...to this day it is impossible to determine how the great pyramids were built so perfectly in line with the stars and Earth's longitude and latitude.


If people like you actually did even 10 minutes research you would realize that this whole thing of the great pyramids somehow aligning with stars, and longitude/latitude is a MYTH and it has been debunked by very credible scientists/astronomers many times over many years.
It is so cringeworthy to have to witness people still bringing this up...

***Rolls eyes until they fall out of my head***


It also amazes me that current engineers can't even build sh*t even close to the complexity to what Engineers did back in Egypt so don't even start on it with me. I have done more research on this stuff more than you have sir.


Do you really want to enter into this argument?




posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

Good call.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 04:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
a reply to: sled735

I still believe that aliens have visited Earth long ago...to this day it is impossible to determine how the great pyramids were built so perfectly in line with the stars and Earth's longitude and latitude.


If people like you actually did even 10 minutes research you would realize that this whole thing of the great pyramids somehow aligning with stars, and longitude/latitude is a MYTH and it has been debunked by very credible scientists/astronomers many times over many years.
It is so cringeworthy to have to witness people still bringing this up...

***Rolls eyes until they fall out of my head***


It also amazes me that current engineers can't even build sh*t even close to the complexity to what Engineers did back in Egypt so don't even start on it with me. I have done more research on this stuff more than you have sir.


Ok. You seem to be oblivious to actual facts, but I shall try to inform you of at least one thing. The four sides of the base of the pyramid of Giza have an average error of around 58mm.
That is impressive.
Was it possible for engineers and architects to achieve it back then? HELL YES.
Is it possible to achieve it nowdays?
You have no concept of how much closer we can cut it nowdays.... And I am deadly serious about this.


edit on 6-6-2015 by Iamnotadoctor because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 05:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
a reply to: sled735

I still believe that aliens have visited Earth long ago...to this day it is impossible to determine how the great pyramids were built so perfectly in line with the stars and Earth's longitude and latitude.


If people like you actually did even 10 minutes research you would realize that this whole thing of the great pyramids somehow aligning with stars, and longitude/latitude is a MYTH and it has been debunked by very credible scientists/astronomers many times over many years.
It is so cringeworthy to have to witness people still bringing this up...

***Rolls eyes until they fall out of my head***


It also amazes me that current engineers can't even build sh*t even close to the complexity to what Engineers did back in Egypt so don't even start on it with me. I have done more research on this stuff more than you have sir.


The reason we can't make many of the ancient monuments today is because of economics. Nobody is going to pony up hundreds of billions of dollars to build a useless giant building. Take any GOOD engineer in the world today give them an unlimited budget and they would cover the planet with pyramids twice the size and grandeur of the great one at Giza.

There is not a single logistical or mechanical reason we cannot build the great pyramid today. It's purely economic. There isn't a stone on there we can't lift, and there isn't a tolerance on there we can't match.

I totally understand getting sucked into the AA narrative, but it's full of holes. I totally believe there is lost history, advanced ancient cultures, possibly alien intervention in our history, but sadly many of the people spreading these ideas are using flat out lies to back up their position.

Not all research is created equal, and if you've spent all or even a majority of your time sticking to AA theory websites and youtube videos you aren't getting the whole story.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 06:00 PM
link   
SUC Swiss University in Cairo
الجامعة السويسرية فى القاهرة

it has to be aliens

edit on 6-6-2015 by torok67 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 06:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa




Seems the OP has scampered off in the face of actual evidence disputing his story and claim.


Standard M.O from some posters here I'm afraid....he/she will no doubt pop up again shortly with another outlandish 100% verifiable story that is shot down in flames as soon as it's posted and then move on to the next one......rinse & repeat.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 06:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
how the great pyramids were built so perfectly in line with the stars and Earth's longitude and latitude.


Care to show us this " perfectly in line with the stars and Earth's longitude and latitude"?


It also amazes me that current engineers can't even build sh*t even close to the complexity to what Engineers did back in Egypt


Care to back that silly claim up with some facts?


I have done more research on this stuff more than you have sir.


You seem to think "research" is visiting and believing silly ancient alien conspiracy theory websites!



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Char-Lee

No there isn't. Ctl-F yielded 0 results.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:05 PM
link   
I must say, the majority of responses in this thread have restored my faith in ATS.
Bravo, everyone. Bravo.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
I must say, the majority of responses in this thread have restored my faith in ATS.
Bravo, everyone. Bravo.


I completely agree. After reading the OP, doing my own research on not only the study in question, but also the "scientist" in question along with the university, I had already come to the conclusion that this was just about the most bogus story I've ever seen . However, I fully expected a majority of responses along the lines of "TOLD YA SO!! HERE's THE EVIDENCE FINALLY!!" I'm quite pleased that my expectations were wrong, and most people actually took a scientific, rational, level-headed approach to this nonsense and called it out for what it is--bogus.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Iamnotadoctor

Care to post the links? When I try to prove something, I try to post as many links as possible. The fact is, most of the "debunked threads" on ATS haven't been debunked at all. For example, there was a UFO crash by Alcyone where a poster said that it was a missile, and then another poster counter by saying that it doesn't explode like a missile and deserves further examination. Nobody countered him, yet people say that's debunked. Another example is the Roswell picture, because it roughly looks like a mummy child, people say it's debunked, when the answer is that it's inconclusive.

A pen is not a pencil. Don't say debunked or hoax when most of these cases are really more like inconclusive.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:21 PM
link   
a reply to: ffx6554

What is so inconclusive about a non-existant study done by a non-existant professor out of a non-existant department at a non-existant university? It's debunked. Get over it.

originally posted by: ffx6554
Another example is the Roswell picture, because it roughly looks like a mummy child, people say it's debunked, when the answer is that it's inconclusive.

You're kidding, right?

Keep an open mind. Believe in aliens, if you want. But don't be a fool.
edit on 6/6/2015 by AdmireTheDistance because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: ffx6554
Another example is the Roswell picture,


Why do you call it a "Roswell picture" There is zero evidence linking the picture of a mummy to Roswell....



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:26 PM
link   
a reply to: sled735

Otherwise it's nice to see your avatar on the boards.

If it'll make you feel any better, I will tell you about a fantasy book that you will probably like that you have never heard of.

It's The Year of Our War by Steph Swainston. You ought to give it a shot if you haven't read it. That's the sort of thing that I read when the world seems less than magical.

Have a good weekend.




posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:26 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

Don't assume that it's a hoax, just because you can't find his name. Many people have been killed for trying to tell the truth, so maybe he altered his name around a little bit.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

What is so inconclusive about a non-existant study done by a non-existant professor out of a non-existant department at a non-existant university? It's debunked. Get over it.


One wonders why the OP did not do some simple checks, like does the University even exist? Does the department even exist? Does the professor even exist?

Or did they just want to believe the nonsense, so they just blindly posted with no research?

The same as the people pushing the Roswell slide hoax, none of the "investigators" bothered to read the label on the slide!
edit on 6-6-2015 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

What is so inconclusive about a non-existant study done by a non-existant professor out of a non-existant department at a non-existant university? It's debunked. Get over it.


One wonders why the OP did not do some simple checks, like does the University even exist? Does the department even exist? Does the professor even exist?

Or did they just want to believe the nonsense, so they just blindly posted with no research?

Welcome to ATS.



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: ffx6554
a reply to: hellobruce

Don't assume that it's a hoax, just because you can't find his name. Many people have been killed for trying to tell the truth, so maybe he altered his name around a little bit.


So he altered his name, altered the name of the university and altered the name of the department at the university - your attempts at covering up a hoax keep getting worse and worse!



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

What label on the slide?



posted on Jun, 6 2015 @ 07:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: ffx6554
a reply to: hellobruce

What label on the slide?

The one that matches all the other plaques in the museum, and clearly identifies it as a human mummy.

You're not winning this debate. Just FYI.
edit on 6/6/2015 by AdmireTheDistance because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
25
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join