It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bucsarg
The male species has lead world country Governments since written history began and probably longer. Their track record speaks for itself.
Our female species are our life givers, caretakers of our children and our sick and frail. Females shy away from violence.
With the above comments in mind do you think that if our female species lead our world country Governments would we be better off then we are now?
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: beezzer
Well to be fair viky didnt do such except sit in Britain looking misrable all the time
The Raj might disagree with that.
They were not amused.
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: crazyewok
She was only miserable after Albert died - before then, she really enjoyed life.
Besides, by that point the Monarchy had been superseded by Parliament in terms of who held the reigns of power.
originally posted by: Dimithae
a reply to: bucsarg
In this day and age,being female,I would say that there would be world peace,and everyone would love everyone else. All the way up until they got their menstrual cycles synced. Then we would have a war like no other. It would make WW2 look like a day at the park. Women can be extremely vindictive and backstabbing when they want to 'get one over' on another. I was one of those girls in school that the other girls either didn't like or just ignored. So I hung around with guys.Much more stable,until the manhood waving would start.......sigh. Forget it.