It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From what I've come to know about you, Sanders sounds like exactly who would make you happy.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Here is a wiki about Social Democracy.
I wonder how close this describes Bernie?
Lots of variables including some Marx.
Social Democracy
originally posted by: FlyersFan
a reply to: BuzzyWigs
From what I've come to know about you, Sanders sounds like exactly who would make you happy. So vote for him if you can. However, I know for sure that he is not what I want. I base that on official statements made by him ... not based on partisan crap that comes out of nonsense sites like RAWSTORY or BRIETBART, etc.
Not everyone wants the same thing or the same direction for this country.
Some want a more socialist bigger gov't type system.
That's fine.
Some want a smaller gov't with less expense.
That's fine.
We can all vote for what we want.
So it's all good.
originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: FyreByrd
www.rawstory.com...
fff.org...
informationstation.org...
Some links I found that were a decent read. What I took out of them was that we are borrowing tax money that we haven't yet collected. Also the higher the debt the more we will end up paying for goods, higher interest rates. Debt done responsible isn't a bad thing, but our government is spending like drunken sailors. Our government doesn't no how to spend money.
originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain
a reply to: ugmold
While I agree with Bernie on some things, his overall approach is Socialism. There are no ifs, ands, or buts...about it. I refuse to live in his kind of economy. I wish people had his grasp of Corporatism and Fiat banking fraud, but he himself wants a Socialist Economy/Democracy Utopia when all is said and done.
His Presidency would expand a ground-up economy and would focus so much on "social justice" that only the poorest and the laziest would be rewarded withe our Bill of Rights...and then some. He's too much of an idealist and his pet ideal is failed policy.
That's who he is at the end of the day. No dice.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain
a reply to: ugmold
While I agree with Bernie on some things, his overall approach is Socialism. There are no ifs, ands, or buts...about it. I refuse to live in his kind of economy. I wish people had his grasp of Corporatism and Fiat banking fraud, but he himself wants a Socialist Economy/Democracy Utopia when all is said and done.
His Presidency would expand a ground-up economy and would focus so much on "social justice" that only the poorest and the laziest would be rewarded withe our Bill of Rights...and then some. He's too much of an idealist and his pet ideal is failed policy.
That's who he is at the end of the day. No dice.
You are living in a 'socialist' economy. The only place you'll find 'libertarianism' is in failed countries with warlords. The US subsidizes big business and big wealth every day - it just doesn't do the same for flesh and bone persons.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
The last time I voted for Hope and Change I got fisted by the U.S. Government instead.
I reserve my judgement. An idealist isn't always the best presidential choice. The last 8 years have proven that, and I voted for the guy. Twice.
originally posted by: AshOnMyTomatoes
So are people just not aware that there are successful, prosperous, and happy countries on Earth where things like health care and education are free? It's not pie-in-the-sky. The CEOs that run our country want us all to believe that though, because it cuts into their profits.
originally posted by: lindalinda
Ugh, same old pie-in-the-sky bull#. Free college. Free health care. You seriously buy that it's "free"? You'll pay for it, quite handsomely. This guy doesn't have a chance.
Universal healthcare means having a right to other people's money
I prefer to help in ways that actually help, which means not through taxes, and not through government hand-outs
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: FyreByrd
Well now might be a good opportunity to give Bernie some advice.
What Social Democratic/Marx type programs would you suggest he pursue?
And of course, *how to* is the big question.
Picture yourself as President Sanders' top advisor.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: FyreByrd
Well now might be a good opportunity to give Bernie some advice.
What Social Democratic/Marx type programs would you suggest he pursue?
And of course, *how to* is the big question.
Picture yourself as President Sanders' top advisor.
Senator Sanders platform is more substantive then I could ever devise.
John Davis remembers a meeting in 1986 when Bernie Sanders, then the mayor of Burlington, Vermont, confronted the owners of the city's largest affordable-housing complex. The federal program that had subsidized the Northgate Apartments for 20 years had a loophole that allowed the landlords to convert the buildings into market rentals or luxury condos.
"Bernie pounded his fist on the conference table in his office and told the owners, 'Over my dead body are you going to displace 336 working families. You are not going to convert Northgate into luxury housing,'" recalled Davis, who was Sanders's key housing aide.
Now that Sanders, a U.S. Senator from Vermont, is running for president, the eight years he spent as Burlington's chief executive (1981-89) will be under close scrutiny. Although President Obama recently joked at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner that Sanders is a "pot-smoking socialist," he was actually a hardworking, pragmatic, effective mayor who helped transform Vermont's largest city (population: 38,000) into a thriving town.
originally posted by: wayforward
Cookie-cutter liberal.
He sees the problems, but not the solutions.
He has a big heart, but a small brain.
Universal healthcare means having a right to other people's money.
No, you don't have a right to other people's money. In fact, you have a right to spend your own money how you see fit.
You have a right to donate to any cause you see fit.
You have a right to withhold your money from causes you don't support, including the US Federal Government.
I prefer to help in ways that actually help, which means not through taxes, and not through government hand-outs.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: FyreByrd
Well now might be a good opportunity to give Bernie some advice.
What Social Democratic/Marx type programs would you suggest he pursue?
And of course, *how to* is the big question.
Picture yourself as President Sanders' top advisor.
Senator Sanders platform is more substantive then I could ever devise.
The bill, the Employ Young Americans Now Act, would provide $5.5 billion in financing to hire a million young people in both summer jobs an year-round work while at the same time offer job training and skills to hundreds of thousands of people in the same age bracket.
$4 billion of the funds would be provided to states and local governments to directly hire people, while the remaining $1.5 billion would be given out as competitive grants to local areas that demonstrate they have the ability to do effective job training.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Movingobject
I am not referring to Scandinavia since they are not socialist but more social democratic
Sanders describes himself as a Democratic Socialist - and he is referring to Scandinavia as his example.
I'm glad you know the difference.
My other post to you was responding to you saying one was going to give more power to 'big corporations' - and the other wants 'big government.' Since it's well established and proven that big corporations don't give a flying rip about the people - not even their own employees, well, I'm interested in looking at the other way.