Archaeologists used radiocarbon dating to chart the rise and fall of the little known culture, which reigned over three valleys north of Lima.
The society, whose heyday ran from 3000 to 1800BC, built ceremonial pyramids and complex irrigation systems.
The find casts doubt on the idea that Andean civilisation began by the sea.
"The scale and sophistication of these sites is unheard of anywhere in the New World at this time," said Jonathan Haas, MacArthur Curator of
Anthropology at the Field Museum, Chicago.
"The cultural pattern that emerged in this small area in the third millennium BC later established a foundation for 4,000 years of cultural
florescence in other parts of the Andes."
BBC
However I doubt about using radiocarbon dating to proof about the age of something, I must say this discovery makes me wonder again how little we know
about our history. All the time we build our knowledge upon evidence we have in our hands, and all the time we find something which doesn't fit into
our carefully made idea about "how it suppose to be'. Is it a proof that our knowledge might be just a tiny dot hidden in a big box do sand of
unknown???
[edit on 23-12-2004 by jazzgul]