It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

House bill would require gun owners to have liability insurance

page: 8
40
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2015 @ 12:52 AM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

I live in a better place than America.

My gun views are always one of interest. I always wonder how people can live like in so much fear that they feel the need to be armed at all times. Canada, where I can walk around gun free knowing that I am completely safe. Of course criminals exist up here but the odds of one blowing me away are slim. I have lived for forty years without a weapon and have yet to be robbed, had my house broken into..etc.


I know I know, Your Canadian you have no say...etc.

So I will leave.




posted on May, 31 2015 @ 12:53 AM
link   
a reply to: thefallenone

I don't go armed either.
But you know what? The odds of me being blown away are pretty slim here too. Not sure how being armed would change that.


edit on 5/31/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 12:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: neo96

Progressives don't want a representative republic.

They want a tyranny, a soft, kind, gentle tyranny.

It's for the children.


I have no doubt of that.

They trying to disarm the military, the police, and now the people.

Tyranny, and despotism can only follow.



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 12:54 AM
link   
We Texas types....see right through the situation....we refuse to be a victim first ...then we temper that with a little man-up common sense, you know, what works in the field....not so much what works for the metro man...


starr me someone...please....make me look good...
edit on 31-5-2015 by GBP/JPY because: our new King.....He comes right after a nicely done fake one


'bout a nine on the tyranny level down there

edit on 31-5-2015 by GBP/JPY because: yessirrr



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 12:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: neo96

Progressives don't want a representative republic.

They want a tyranny, a soft, kind, gentle tyranny.

It's for the children.


Let me know how your guns are stopping the tyranny of America.
Looks like it is going great.


Now I'm out for real. You guys are hilarious though. I am part of no party. I am just a guy who loves to point out how idiotic the arguments are.

Still love these "with guns we can rebel if the government screws us just not yet" "guns in America keep people safe" apparently criminals haven't got the memo..


edit on 31-5-2015 by thefallenone because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 12:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: thefallenone

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: neo96

Progressives don't want a representative republic.

They want a tyranny, a soft, kind, gentle tyranny.

It's for the children.


Let me know how your guns are stopping the tyranny of America.
Looks like it is going great.




Let me know when gun regulation, and gun insurance stops anyone from getting shot.



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 12:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: thefallenone

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: neo96

Progressives don't want a representative republic.

They want a tyranny, a soft, kind, gentle tyranny.

It's for the children.


Let me know how your guns are stopping the tyranny of America.
Looks like it is going great.




You have a point.

Guns alone won't stop it especially when so many are embracing it.



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 12:59 AM
link   
Oh yeah people!

Health insurance stopped people from getting sick.

Auto insurance stopped people from crashing, and drunk driving.

Bankers insurance stopped banks from getting bailed out.

WOO HOO gun insurance is gonna stop people from getting shot.

What utter nonsense.



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:00 AM
link   
a reply to: beezzer



Guns alone won't stop it especially when so many are embracing it.

Isn't that sort of an oxymoron? A populist tyranny?



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Phage, most people don't want the responsibility that comes with freedom anymore.

Just my humble opinion.



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: thefallenone

I don't go armed either.
But you know what? The odds of me being blown away are pretty slim here too. Not sure how being armed would change that.



So you mean that criminals do not run America? Whew because according to gun owners criminals are all over the place looking to kill you.

They make America seem like it is the wild wild west still and if unarmed your just another victim.



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
Oh yeah people!

Health insurance stopped people from getting sick.

Auto insurance stopped people from crashing, and drunk driving.

Bankers insurance stopped banks from getting bailed out.

WOO HOO gun insurance is gonna stop people from getting shot.

What utter nonsense.



And this my friends is why you can't debate some gun owners.
I mean, really?..



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:05 AM
link   
a reply to: thefallenone

2nd or 3rd time now.
You know better and are playing dumb.
We aren't afraid here we are mostly BRAVE ...and have guns, so what's to scare us ?
What are we FRENCH?
edit on 31-5-2015 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: thefallenone

originally posted by: neo96
Oh yeah people!

Health insurance stopped people from getting sick.

Auto insurance stopped people from crashing, and drunk driving.

Bankers insurance stopped banks from getting bailed out.

WOO HOO gun insurance is gonna stop people from getting shot.

What utter nonsense.



And this my friends is why you can't debate some gun owners.
I mean, really?..








Thought you were leaving or are you misspeaking?



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Well if you DID openly carry a gun the police might try to pick you off or if you happended to live in one of the urban cesspools someone might shoot you to take it but ouside of the only Europeans think this anyway.



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:08 AM
link   
a reply to: thefallenone




And this my friends is why you can't debate some gun owners.


Because the anti gun crowd can't come up with a coherent argument ?

Hey everyone Thou shall not kill was made in to law by the secular state.

Well that didn't stop people killing let's ban ONE THING out of hundred, and that will surely stop it.

No wait.

That just made the 99% criminals, an even though they don't break they law.

By GOD make more laws, and then make them get insurance!



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:08 AM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7




Well if you DID openly carry a gun the police might try to pick you off or if you happended to live in one of the urban cesspools someone might shoot you to take it but ouside of the only Europeans think this anyway.

Can you rephrase that?



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Under the right circumstaces an open display of a firearm CAN be an issue.



posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:11 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96




Health insurance stopped people from getting sick.
Auto insurance stopped people from crashing, and drunk driving.
Bankers insurance stopped banks from getting bailed out.


You are hilarious.

Yeah that's why they create health insurance, to stop people from getting sick. Car insurance to stop people from getting into accidents.etc.





posted on May, 31 2015 @ 01:11 AM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7
That goes without saying.
It can easily be (mis)interpreted as a challenge.




top topics



 
40
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join