It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The growing, nonpartisan drive to declassify a 28-page finding on foreign government support of the 9/11 hijackers is about to take an enormous step forward with the introduction of a Senate resolution urging the president to release the material to the public. Dramatically compounding the issue’s visibility, the resolution is being introduced by high-profile Republican presidential hopeful Rand Paul of Kentucky. A spokesperson for Senator Paul told 28Pages.org that Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden will cosponsor the resolution, which will serve as the upper chamber’s companion to House Resolution 14. Wyden is a member of the Senate intelligence committee
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Jchristopher5
Thanks for posting this. I will have to read up on the issue.
By the way, may want to change your title from Ron to Rand.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Jchristopher5
I have a question. Let's say hypothetically that this bill has more than a snowball's chance in hell of passing (which it doesn't), and it gets passed. If after the missed pages are released, if they were to confirm the official story, would you and other truthers finally accept it as truth? Or are you just looking for additional evidence to confirm a conclusion you already came to before seeing this information?
originally posted by: Jchristopher5
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Jchristopher5
I have a question. Let's say hypothetically that this bill has more than a snowball's chance in hell of passing (which it doesn't), and it gets passed. If after the missed pages are released, if they were to confirm the official story, would you and other truthers finally accept it as truth? Or are you just looking for additional evidence to confirm a conclusion you already came to before seeing this information?
I can't speak for anyone but myself. I first want the missing 28 pages released.
Next, I want it to put pressure on congress and the White House for a new, impartial investigation. One where all the players would testify openly, as called upon by the impartial commission. Not one controlled by either party, congress, the White House, or the CIA. Congress' only job will be to allot funds for the real investigation. Skeptics and conspiracy proponents would share the floor. Everything would be debated openly.
If the appointments are fair and balanced, and issues are debated fairly, openly, and impartially, then I will accept whatever conclusions are reached from such a commission.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Jchristopher5
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Jchristopher5
I have a question. Let's say hypothetically that this bill has more than a snowball's chance in hell of passing (which it doesn't), and it gets passed. If after the missed pages are released, if they were to confirm the official story, would you and other truthers finally accept it as truth? Or are you just looking for additional evidence to confirm a conclusion you already came to before seeing this information?
I can't speak for anyone but myself. I first want the missing 28 pages released.
Next, I want it to put pressure on congress and the White House for a new, impartial investigation. One where all the players would testify openly, as called upon by the impartial commission. Not one controlled by either party, congress, the White House, or the CIA. Congress' only job will be to allot funds for the real investigation. Skeptics and conspiracy proponents would share the floor. Everything would be debated openly.
If the appointments are fair and balanced, and issues are debated fairly, openly, and impartially, then I will accept whatever conclusions are reached from such a commission.
So, in other words, your answer is no then. So why bother if it at the most is only going to reinforce your beliefs and has no chance of changing your mind? Sounds like you just want to reinforce confirmation bias there.
As for you "impartial investigation" I don't even know how that would even be organized to satisfy the conspiracy nuts. They always like finding things wrong with investigations when they don't go the way they want them to. Case in point, you highlighting a bunch of perceived issues that need correcting from the first commission if they were to do a second one.
originally posted by: Nova937
a reply to: Jchristopher5
It would be nice also to see the so called plane hitting the Pentagon videos. But seeing as it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon (obviously) then these videos will never be released.
If the videos show a plane then why don't they release them???????
There is an obvious answer to that too!
originally posted by: Nova937
Santa Claus! Your right! Anyone that believes the Official Story of 9/11 is either Stupid or a Shill. They must be dumb enough to believe Santa Claus exists. Or they are just VERY Gullible.
The Official version of that day defies physics and belief! There is no way in hell 2 planes can take down 3 towers. No way. They look like Demolitions and the people that believe in the Official BS Stories can't have seen any demolitions before.
And the Pentagon crap! Don't get me started on that one! After the official story came out I was like WTF??????
Shanksville? Lol. The drills of that day and weeks before? The severe lack of evidence to support the official BS?
Are people that stupid these days? Has the dumbing down of the population with Fluoride, Vaccines, Sh*tty TV, WiFi and the BS Education System Worked?
Sorry for the rant but it just mystifies me as to how people can believe the BS Official sequence of events. It's STUPID!
Releasing the pages, which allegedly speak to Saudi-funding of 9/11 would be a huge step forward for the truth movement.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Jchristopher5
I have a question. Let's say hypothetically that this bill has more than a snowball's chance in hell of passing (which it doesn't), and it gets passed. If after the missed pages are released, if they were to confirm the official story, would you and other truthers finally accept it as truth? Or are you just looking for additional evidence to confirm a conclusion you already came to before seeing this information?