It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NeoSpace
It's actually a microscopic image of plankton taken from a rock found in the Bass River core in New Jersey.
scitechdaily.com...
All the space missions are a hoax, we are living in an enclosed plain under a huge dome, what we know as space is nothimg more than a projection.
originally posted by: bananashooter
Well that explains it, why did they not focus on the most interesting part?
originally posted by: Ross 54
Several images were taken in this new sequence, called OpNav 9. It's resolution is about twice as sharp as with previous pictures. It's probable that the bright spots were in at least one of these images, as these are just as interesting to the scientists as they are to the public, and they lie fairly near the image already released. It's probable that such a picture will be released in the near future.
Just supposing that something artificial-looking were revealed by an image, it's possible that it would be held, to examine it very carefully. They could wish to determine that the controversial content was not due to some technical fault, before releasing it.
They way these images have been slowly improving , as the spacecraft nears Ceres, it might be hard to set a definite point in time when they indicate something not made by natural forces. Supposing there is something of this sort to be revealed, it might well be borne in on us only very gradually.
originally posted by: ilpero
It is quite revealing when you stop to think about it. Of course people at NASA know witch pictures are in great intrest to most of people. By deliberatly not showing us those pictures they want to feed general paranoia and speculation about their motives. That way when they finally reveal mundane pictures showing some ice plumes or salt deposits on the surface tptb can once more ridicule conspiracy theorists who fell for it once again.
It wouldn't be fair if someone other than them made a discovery and took credit for it.
originally posted by: Char-Lee
a reply to: wildespace
It wouldn't be fair if someone other than them made a discovery and took credit for it.
I think the public who pays for it should share as the discoveries are made and make the journey together with the scientists!
originally posted by: wildespace
originally posted by: Char-Lee
a reply to: wildespace
It wouldn't be fair if someone other than them made a discovery and took credit for it.
I think the public who pays for it should share as the discoveries are made and make the journey together with the scientists!
Should the taxpayers also share in the military exploits and weapons research, as well as healthcare and medicines? The public provides the money, but the actual work is better left to the professionals.
originally posted by: Char-Lee
originally posted by: wildespace
originally posted by: Char-Lee
a reply to: wildespace
It wouldn't be fair if someone other than them made a discovery and took credit for it.
I think the public who pays for it should share as the discoveries are made and make the journey together with the scientists!
Should the taxpayers also share in the military exploits and weapons research, as well as healthcare and medicines? The public provides the money, but the actual work is better left to the professionals.
I don't see how adventures and space exploration is the same as meds and war machines.
originally posted by: Char-Lee
I think the public who pays for it should share as the discoveries are made and make the journey together with the scientists!
PS: all of this because someone suspects (without any real evidence) that they didn't share the "interesting" (for whom?) photos.
originally posted by: Char-Lee
I don't see why all photos and data should not be up for public view online.
No need for them to conclude anything just show what they have just as they would if exploring the arctic or any other human endeavor paid for by the public.
I am sure they don't show us all of the things they see and all of the photos, everything is of interest to many people but the main point is we own the stuff we paid for it.
Don't you think you are being unjust to the scientists?
I don't remember a discovery in the sense of looking at a photo and clearly seeing something.
you really don't know are true or not, and act as if it's true