This is being called a Nuke! Can someone identify this weapon? Yemen Conflict.

a reply to: Zaphod58
My first conclusion.


So how then do you explain an F16 dropping a 9000lb bomb
That causes electrical interference like that of nuclear weapons
and ionises the air causing it to fluoresce.

The only confirmation lacking now is counter readings from the crator.
Which we got from the bomb in Labanon. Also dropped from a fighter aircraft.
which was also in the 3-4000 kg range.

Which is why the "evidence" points to it being something secret and nuclear in nature.

a reply to: mSparks43

Because knowing what would happen countries are throwing nuclear weapons around without a care in the world. Of course. That makes perfect sense.

So readings from a completely different weapon, in adifferent country confirm that this was a nuclear weapon. Once again, makes perfect sense.

originally posted by: stuthealien
a reply to: ScientificRailgun

this is my last response to your posts as this takes us off topic,but simply the russians incased theirs in concrete negating the effects,,japan however has done squat really,and even have contaminated the ocean,
i know far more about nuclear reactions and there effects then you clearly do.

If you really think "Cover it in concrete" made everything better in Chernobyl, you know nothing about nuclear science, or the history of the disaster. One, the sarcophagus was constructed MONTHS after the disaster had already released most of it's radioactive contents into the environment. Two, That alone did almost nothing to prevent the cancer deaths that occurred because of the radioactive contamination. Three, the sarcophagus was designed to prevent workers who STILL work at the Chernobyl site today, to avoid being exposed to the worst of the radiation from the still highly radioactive materials at the site exposed to the air. The contamination to the environment had already been done, this sarcophagus was a bandaid applied to a sword wound.

The fact that you know almost nothing about nuclear science proves to me that this event in almost certainly not a nuclear detonation of any sort.

Have fun in your little "JEWS NOOKED YEMEN" hugbox.

really was that called for??????

clearly this is a unknown weapon of some kind,and im still hoping no-one got nuked.

a reply to: Zaphod58

you mean
______beforeitsnews/alternative/2015/05/nato-official-well-be-at-war-by-summer-if-were-lucky-it-wont-be-nuclear-3162312.html

yeah, kinda sucks doesn't it.

____
wow, why does that happen?

a reply to: mSparks43

And this fall, when we're not at war, just like past years I'll be glad to point out that article was wrong.

BiN is not allowed as a source so the link won't post.

a reply to: Zaphod58

Alternatively we would be already.
But the UK head of state is in no fit state to declare it.

Alternatively
We already are
just it's all happening somewhere else atm.

a reply to: Zaphod58

cool.

I'll make sure I read BiN everyday from now on then.

originally posted by: stuthealien
really was that called for??????

clearly this is a unknown weapon of some kind,and im still hoping no-one got nuked.

No-one got nuked. There hasn't been a single case of Acute Radiation Syndrome as a result of this explosion. Not one. There is no type of nuclear detonation that doesn't result in ARS for at least SOME of the survivors.

Unless there's a global coverup going on of massive proportions, nobody got nuked.

a reply to: mSparks43

It's always been happening somewhere. There has hardly been a year that has gone by that someone hasn't been at war with a neighbor.

A war on the scale they claim has been forecast for decades and we're still here.

a reply to: ScientificRailgun

yes i know no one has radiation that has been reported,,,but most of us including yourself see the interferance pattern,

now we know the u.s has low powered e.m.p weapons that does not harm people (according to their figures)
could this be placed inside a bomb????????
if it could im sure they would like it tested

a reply to: ScientificRailgun

->Unless there's a global coverup going on of massive proportions,.

Probably not a good idea to point out that is exactly what the thousands of people with possibly 100s of thousands of internet persona at HBGary and their various subsidiaries do everyday then.

a reply to: stuthealien

They're not EMP weapons, they're HPM weapons, and they're designed to destroy electronics not blow up large areas.

a reply to: Zaphod58

We've been lucky the last 8 years or so.
Obama did quite frankly an amazing job of not letting it escalate it to that level.

next one we probably wont be so lucky.

a reply to: stuthealien

There needs to be several pieces of evidence in order to draw the "nuke" conclusion. the white flecks seen on films from nuclear detonations and the chernobyl disaster is a result of high-energy particles striking the film (or CCD/CMOS in digital cameras), not the result of an EMP.

Yes, there are white flecks seen on the films in Yemen. But that alone is not enough evidence for a nuclear detonation. White flecks There are several other factors that need to be determined as well, such as "Is there fallout?" So far, the answer is no. "Are there victims or radiation poisoning?" So far, the answer is no. Things aren't adding up.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: stuthealien

They're not EMP weapons, they're HPM weapons, and they're designed to destroy electronics not blow up large areas.

yes but it would make sense to kill two birds with one stone er bomb.

a reply to: mSparks43

I heard that a lot too over the years. This person did this, or that person did that and it's the only reason. In a few cases it really did come down to one person saying no, but we're still here.

a reply to: stuthealien

A ground detonation for a weapon like that is the worst possible design, that's why. Anything that is going to destroy electronics like that is going to donate in an air burst designed to have the largest possible footprint.

originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: stuthealien

There needs to be several pieces of evidence in order to draw the "nuke" conclusion. the white flecks seen on films from nuclear detonations and the chernobyl disaster is a result of high-energy particles striking the film (or CCD/CMOS in digital cameras), not the result of an EMP.

Yes, there are white flecks seen on the films in Yemen. But that alone is not enough evidence for a nuclear detonation. White flecks There are several other factors that need to be determined as well, such as "Is there fallout?" So far, the answer is no. "Are there victims or radiation poisoning?" So far, the answer is no. Things aren't adding up.

actually an e.m.p does cause those white flecks,,,this is what causes that ,a nuclear explosion creates a electromagnetic pulse which is why you see the white flecks in a nuclear explosion...
so a e.m.p on its own would also cause the same effect,,,as its just electro magnetic particles

a reply to: Zaphod58

its not about "one person saying no" though is it.

It's about those with the power to declare war and peace not saying yes.

WWII for example came down to one mans speech
they even did a film about it
www.imdb.com...