It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
I just love it when people present circumstantial events like they are proven events then build a theory based on it.
Not to be rude, but that is called a Hypothesis and is perfectly valid method for a foundation of understanding and for building proof upon. I would guess that most of what is called Science today was built on what stated as a hypothesis. If it is good enough for science then it is good enough here.
-MM
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance
So you do nothing by slam the OP for unverifiable facts and then went on to say:
I also believe that we have done more in space than is publicly known, but to what extent, I'm not sure.
So you are all science and scholar in one post and then a raving theorist in the next.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
I just love it when people present circumstantial events like they are proven events then build a theory based on it.
Not to be rude, but that is called a Hypothesis and is perfectly valid method for a foundation of understanding and for building proof upon. I would guess that most of what is called Science today was built on what stated as a hypothesis. If it is good enough for science then it is good enough here.
-MM
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
I read in a book once that a cow jumped over the moon..it must be true since we are taking any written thing as FACT.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
I just love it when people present circumstantial events like they are proven events then build a theory based on it.
Not to be rude, but that is called a Hypothesis and is perfectly valid method for a foundation of understanding and for building proof upon. I would guess that most of what is called Science today was built on what stated as a hypothesis. If it is good enough for science then it is good enough here.
-MM
HAHA..that is NOT a hypothesis
originally posted by: sn0rch
And in the deep blue ocean, a dolphin blows a bubble... "Is the ocean a prison ocean, if not, why can't we leave? history has shown us aliens from he air have visited us.." and the other dolphins gather around and reply "Because we cannot survive in the air. Plus the aliens from the air are nasty. And besides, I like fish."
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
I just love it when people present circumstantial events like they are proven events then build a theory based on it.
Not to be rude, but that is called a Hypothesis and is perfectly valid method for a foundation of understanding and for building proof upon. I would guess that most of what is called Science today was built on what stated as a hypothesis. If it is good enough for science then it is good enough here.
-MM
No that ISN'T a hypothesis. A hypothesis makes an assumption then sets out to collect evidence to see if it is true or not. What we have above are a bunch of assumptions then a theory built using the assumption that those assumptions are absolutely true. That isn't a hypothesis, it is confirmation bias. I understand that it can be tough to tell the difference between the two though.
hypothesis
[hahy-poth-uh-sis, hi-]
A proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Ok fair point. I meant scientific hypothesis, but the reasoning in the OP still isn't a valid hypothesis scientific or otherwise. The OP is using an unproven hypothesis to prove another hypothesis. THAT is confirmation bias no matter which ways you slice it.
For ~ 6,000 years recorded history and 12,000 years history in stones, humanity had multiple visitations of ETs, and build up of giant structures on earth, along with setting the first civilizations.
However, the human nations were never allowed to move freely into space. It was permitted only to the "gods" to come and go from planet Earth.
Therefore, it is logical to ask: isn't the Earth a prison planet, under quarantine of some kind, where the humans were sent for past trespasses in previous lives?
Or if there weren't such, what is the reason for incarceration of all human descendants of the DNA changed by Annunaki?
How about a just recompense for that, by higher galactic senates and courts?
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
There are many of us that believe of an Embargo of Earth by some otherworldly force about 5-6,000 years ago at the around the start of Kali Yuga (the age that we are currently in). Some call these otherworldly "extraterrestrials" or "interdimensional"; the point being that planet Earth got new owners that have a very different plan for human kind here in Earth than the previous owners. The Vedas talk about this, the Babylonian cuneiform scriptures, and many other texts from across the planet.
I believe that anyone can leave the planet once you are dead and in your spirit form; the problem is that many of humans do not achieve a sense of Self during their lifetime. This lack of focus on the self causes the recently dead to be drawn into re-birth here on Earth rather than taking a conscious decision to leave Earth when in spirit form.
-MM
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: sn0rch
And in the deep blue ocean, a dolphin blows a bubble... "Is the ocean a prison ocean, if not, why can't we leave? history has shown us aliens from he air have visited us.." and the other dolphins gather around and reply "Because we cannot survive in the air. Plus the aliens from the air are nasty. And besides, I like fish."
Dolphins are mammals and thus air breathing, they need air to live. The need to live in the sea to survive though, so I get your point.
Another fun fact about fish is that all fish are aliens, there is no such thing as a fish. The Nobel Prize winning biologist Stephen Jay Gould concluded after a lifetime's studying of fish that there is no such thing as a fish.
-MM
originally posted by: Legman
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
There are many of us that believe of an Embargo of Earth by some otherworldly force about 5-6,000 years ago at the around the start of Kali Yuga (the age that we are currently in). Some call these otherworldly "extraterrestrials" or "interdimensional"; the point being that planet Earth got new owners that have a very different plan for human kind here in Earth than the previous owners. The Vedas talk about this, the Babylonian cuneiform scriptures, and many other texts from across the planet.
I believe that anyone can leave the planet once you are dead and in your spirit form; the problem is that many of humans do not achieve a sense of Self during their lifetime. This lack of focus on the self causes the recently dead to be drawn into re-birth here on Earth rather than taking a conscious decision to leave Earth when in spirit form.
-MM
Which high school did you go to? They left all of this out of our curriculum!!
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: Legman
You mean your school didn't offer a creative writing course?