It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
daskakik: We are not talking about an event but an ideal. You presented "It is alright to pursue the self gratification unless you hurt others in the pursuit of it." as an absolute, just as others have presented similar ideals as absolute but, are they?
daskakik: That is what the OP is asking while at the same time offering an alternative model in which pain and suffering are integral parts of the human experience. They are obviously present so it doesn't seem like a stretch to think that that may be by design.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
Oh yes we are talking about 'events' the recent/occuring human creates to solve its past Karmic misaims. There is no 'ideal' in the present, the ideal lives in the FUTURE event of your next lifetime experience (again to solve last lifetime screw-ups). Perfection of dedication to correct could be called an absolute perfection of an F-up. YES.
I do not know what the question is as was suggesting a model of something intangible. The human experience/design is to suffer and conquer itself (without a God proper) with DIGNITY/VERVE/FORTITUDE. You realize this was Gods intent (to visualize itself as the human describing itself as the conquering HERO FINALLY). Ultimately, my realization is this: GOD is vain (has an Achilles heel).
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: vethumanbeing
Again, you are expressing that as if it has been proven to be true.
It might feel true to you but that isn't the same as being true.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
What is true for me is not true for you.
VHB: What is true for me is not true for you.
daskakik: What is true for you and what is true for me may both be untrue.
The phrase "past Karmic misaims" seems strange.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
Truth is subjective to the participant or the observer. Real truth is of a Gnostic understanding (you intrinsically KNOW DNA coding). Reincarnation is not a new phenomenon; well known in Hindu/Buddhist traditions to correct past life errors (purify that soul progressing). To what purpose; to reconnect with a God creator, and have a good story to tell.
vhb: Truth is subjective to the participant or the observer. Real truth is of a Gnostic understanding (you intrinsically KNOW DNA coding). Reincarnation is not a new phenomenon; well known in Hindu/Buddhist traditions to correct past life errors (purify that soul progressing). To what purpose; to reconnect with a God creator, and have a good story to tell.
dask: This is still your subjective truth.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
Where is the flaw? I am coming from the perspective of "human experience" that the AUO can take from or reject. It does not or cannot experience human emotion as it is not a material entity. We are being used as information gatherers.
There is the problem of EGO. We developed a unique sense of 'identity' within this process. As the EGO becomes individualized (personality etc.) the connection to a God source de-evolves; as in the necessity of having a God caretaker becomes less relevant (never here in the first place as a first person worshipful entity). It miscalculated the ingenuity of the plasticity of the human mind to reinvent itself or in other words its ability for the capacity of Imagination.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
Where is the flaw? I am coming from the perspective of "human experience" that the AUO can take from or reject. It does not or cannot experience human emotion as it is not a material entity. We are being used as information gatherers.
Information, to what end?
There is the problem of EGO. We developed a unique sense of 'identity' within this process. As the EGO becomes individualized (personality etc.) the connection to a God source de-evolves; as in the necessity of having a God caretaker becomes less relevant (never here in the first place as a first person worshipful entity). It miscalculated the ingenuity of the plasticity of the human mind to reinvent itself or in other words its ability for the capacity of Imagination.
The flaw is that you assume that a God source even exists and that it needs information.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
I understand myself as Gods expression (am I insane).
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
I understand myself as Gods expression (am I insane).
I don't know but, you can be wrong.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
If I am Wrong Then So Is God=No Foul Committed.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
If I am Wrong Then So Is God=No Foul Committed.
Unless you're wrong about god then there is a foul against the truth.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
I am not wrong about my understanding of the AUO (it revealed itself to me).
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
I am not wrong about my understanding of the AUO (it revealed itself to me).
You could be wrong about what you think revealed itself to you.