It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: vethumanbeing
You missed the point and are skirting the OP's premise.
Logically, if you are allowed to do something that means that there will not be any repercussions.
You say all is allowed but then list a set of rules and consequences. Just like I pointed out in my previous post, both can't be true.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
Why cannot both be true at the same time; there are no rules only the consequences/action thereof.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
Why cannot both be true at the same time; there are no rules only the consequences/action thereof.
Consequences imply rules.
If there are no rules there are no consequences.
If there are consequences then there are some kind of rules.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: vethumanbeing
I know what itisnowagain is saying. I don't think he would agree with everything you posted. I usually just ignore his posts because they seem rather pointless to me. All he has is wordplay that sounds witty and profound but is pretty useless.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
The belief that you are separate to life makes value and meaning important.
There is nothing IN life that is useful - there is just life.
You want something that you can use - but for what purpose?
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: vethumanbeing
You are just running loose with the terms.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
I am not; I only report what I recognize as being 'my truth'.
No rules just ordered chaos.
anyone/those that decides and are allowed (LONG LINE) to incarnate as a human ON EARTH have rules to abide by
dask: "Your truth" is full of contradictions
dask: But a couple posts back you said:
vhb: anyone/those that decide and are allowed (LONG LINES to wait) to incarnate as a human ON EARTH there are rules to abide by
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: vethumanbeing
How is it that you can say there are rules in one post, then say that there are no rules in another and now you are trying to explain the rules. That is called flip-flopping.
It isn't that I don't understand what you are saying but, I can't take anyone seriously when they can't keep their answers from contradicting.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
YOU choose to follow rules or not follow rules.
If you understood the basics you would not be calling me out as contradictory.
I suppose "do only what authorities allow us to" is better?
The only reason we have laws are to protect people from stupid people.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: vethumanbeing
Let's get one thing straight, I'm not asking you to teach me anything. The fact that you say one thing and later say the opposite is all I'm really interested in pointing out.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
If you are not interested in my understanding of how this Universe works you seem to be only one thing; one that is a protagonist of a negative nature.
If your goal is to nit-pick/nail clipper me to death you have failed (wasted your time).