It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

ISIS nuke threat heightened.

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on May, 23 2015 @ 09:56 AM
this is another link reporting the potential nukes-4-ISIS scaremongering...

"According to the latest issue of ISIL’s propaganda magazine, Islamic State jihadist group (ISIL) could obtain a nuclear weapon within 12 month."

© AFP 2015/ Tauseef MUSTAFA

MOSCOW (Sputnik) – The Islamic State jihadist group (ISIL) could obtain a nuclear weapon within 12 month, according to the latest issue of the ISIL’s propaganda magazine Dabiq.

“The Islamic State has billions of dollars in the bank, so they call on their wilayah in Pakistan to purchase a nuclear device through weapons dealers with links to corrupt officials in the region," the article, attributed to British photojournalist John Cantlie held hostage by the ISIL for over two years, said...

Read more:

there is more in the article, like the USA-London attempt to tie 'chemical-weapons use to Assad" failure...
somehow, the west is ginning up fear of ISIS capabilities to removing Syrian leader Assad from power & occupy Syria
~ I sure don't get the ISIS with nuke possession to overthrowing Assad ~

heck, ISIS is sending in advance martyrs into Saudi land before their invasion from Jordan/Iraq border
while the Shia renegade-Houties advance into Saudi land from the southern border of Yemen
... the Saudi's are proported to have at least 1 Pakistani nuke in Its' possession already
(ergo - another place from which to procure a nuke by ISIS)

also from link:

...Once the ISIL buys the bomb in Pakistan, according to the article, it would transport it through Lybia and Nigeria to the West.

“Drug shipments from Columbia bound for Europe pass through West Africa, so moving other types of contraband from East to West is just as possible,” the article pointed out.

Cantlie stressed that the ISIL is looking to do “something big” on the US soil and it will be more real “a year from today.”

“The more groups that pledge allegiance [to the ISIL] the more possible it becomes to pull off something truly epic,” he added.

the ball of wax is getting bigger and dirtier as the days go by... the ISIL-ISIS Shock troops of black ops will only be defeated by the substantial assistance of Russia working with Iraq+Western combined militaries

edit on rd31143239379123092015 by St Udio because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 10:08 AM
I'll take a loaf of bread, some ham and that cheese....o'yeah and that low yeild Nuke on the second shelf........

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 10:36 AM

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: socketdude
a reply to: Soloprotocol

Yeah, sorry - I was waiting on you creating the thread, but since you didn't I went ahead and did it.
On topic, who knows? The problem is people didn't give the Nazi's much credit before their unfortunate rise to power. We know they have the money, so perhaps IF they can get the nuke, another world power who has an interest in attacking the US might aid them.... Russia? China? North Korea? Who knows.

I dont believe for one minute Russia, China, North Korea and Pakistan would ever sell a Nuke to anyone in the knowledge they would use it in a terror attack. That would be a Huge mistake to make.

Unless it's your enemy it's being used on. I'm tired of the constant fear drivel about ISIS. Crush them if they re not a CIA meme. Hell, destroy them period. I'm playing Doris Day in memory of fear not ruining my day. I'm going to the beach.

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 11:01 AM
a reply to: socketdude

Infinitely closer?
Can they really say they are closer to smuggling it into the US if they havent actually acquired it yet?

They are full of it. No government would risk selling their nukes to radicals. It would have to be a stolen nuke.

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 11:07 AM

originally posted by: socketdude
-- I'm concerned about being **fed the information** that ISIS is closer to acquiring a nuke.

The conundrum of conspiracy minds...

The media reports on something and we are "being fed the information"
The media doesnt report something and it's being held back on purpose..

Bad things and bad people exist in the world outside of the IllumiNSACIAmasons.

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 12:09 PM

originally posted by: saadad
Recently i watched a documentary: Everything is a rich mans trick. And at the end he says, what is next? Nuclear bomb on USA soil.

And i would suggest to you Americans to give green light to Obama to go and make money for the big corporations in the Syria. Because it is better to go now, when nuclear bomb didn't explode, than go later when bomb will explode, because if anything is true in the documentary i have watch, then this evil people are more than ready to detonate a nuclear bomb on USA soil just to make money.

THIS is all the truth you need to know about ISIS and Syria. Couldn't have worded it better myself.

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 02:23 PM

originally posted by: socketdude
ISIS closer to buying Pakistani Nuke

Islamic State has claimed it is 'infinitely' closer to buying a nuclear bomb from Pakistan and smuggling it into the US. An article, apparently penned by British hostage John Cantlie for the terror group’s magazine, Dabiq, says the scenario is 'more possible today than it was just one year ago'.

Looks like this could get the ball rolling for Obama to finally get boots on ground in Syria.

Obama: Boots on ground if ISIS get nukes

Could be interesting times to come. The Assad chemical weapons against children didn't persuade the public to go to war in Syria, but I'm sure ISIS with a nuke will help sway public opinion.

Wouldn't make any sense.... Pakistan was the ones who delivered Bin Laden to you guys.

This is merely a pretext to suede the people into agreeing to #ing up the world with more needless war.
If you guys took every dollar you spent on pissing on the middleeast, and gave it to the entire lower class; there would be no lower class or homeless..............

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 02:57 PM
This is the very reason that Obama will go down as one of the worst leaders in history.

Him and Bush

The point is you don’t let an insane group like this have any power anywhere for ten minutes let alone years.

These are religious fanatics who could very well convince some Pakistani religious fanatics to get them atomic weapons now that they have been in power so long.

Remember Pakistan is a Wahhabi nut house just like Saudi and ISIS.

There is not much to go from a non violent Salafi-Wahhabi to a Jihadi who are suicidal, homicidal, and genocidal

To give such lunatics access to not only governmental institutions but access to lethal technology that is not far from nuclear weaponry is a crime in itself.

Sure it will take time and effort to get such weaponry but they have done what has been unexpected already

And to have such nuts trying to get it is bad enough
edit on 23-5-2015 by Willtell because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 05:03 PM
I'm not sure if this has been said but whats more worrisome is that they are reporting they are in the process. They way it works here in America is that when something is being reported on like this it would mean that X was already acquired and that whatever the plan for X is was already in motion. Not to mention that their PR campaign seems very western.

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 05:08 PM
a reply to: socketdude

I remember the Syria situation and the strong push to get the public on board. I wonder what happened to that. I have come to understand more recently that these wars are actually... helpful, or necessary, to help the American economy itself. But I guess the American government admitting to that would be somehow a bad thing or it would take away from the war plans themselves? I don't know.

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 05:51 PM

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: roadgravel

ISIS are selling the oil locally within Syria and on the black market to Turkey.

There's no tankers.

It's not much good unless turned over to a pipeline or refinery. Can't be a secret. Maybe turn of a valve.

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 06:24 PM
a reply to: socketdude

ISIS is getting scared...they no longer feel their techniques are adequate and need to borrow the style from the world power and use his creation to accomplish the goals of something they call allah.

the moment ISIS get a nuke, someone will be handy to gently insert it into the backside of their caliph!

Bayezid in a Cage

edit on 23-5-2015 by michaelbrux because: (no reason given)

all imagery, even from the olden times, should have musical accompaniment:

edit on 23-5-2015 by michaelbrux because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 24 2015 @ 03:23 AM

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
And how are they supposed to buy a Nuke. It's not like you can just go to the Nuke Shop and buy one off the shelf, and even if they get their hands on a Warhead, what's the chances they can successfully detonate it...Dirty Bomb at most?

Pakistan has estimated 130 nukes with an unstable government riddled with corruption and full of Islamic fanatics ........

They hid Bin Laden for almost 10 years, the compound he was hiding in was built by the person who does the design work for the ISI (Pakistan intelligence service)

Consider that for years A Q Khan who developed Pakistan's nuclear arseanal was allowed to run the world selling design
plans for nuclear weapons and helping such countries as Libya and Syria obtain technology to build them

Then is North Korea, country which is starving and falling apart, run by paranoid dictator of limited intelligence with
bad haircut......

North Korea was helping Syria develop a secret nuclear reactor which destroyed by Israel before fuel was loaded
and became operational

Odds that a nuclear weapon will either be diverted by Islamic fanatics in Pakistan or sold to ISIS is troubling

Or that North Korea may sell a weapon to ISIS or rouge regime .......

posted on May, 24 2015 @ 12:53 PM
a reply to: Soloprotocol

Califnornias national guard just ran a drill for a dirty bomb a month ago

posted on May, 24 2015 @ 12:59 PM
a reply to: fireladdie

i thought those types of weapons had chemical signatures...are you suggesting the North Koreans or Pakistanis or anyone else with nuclear capability is prepared for the response when a weapon with their signature is used against the United States?

is this thread even serious?

i know many people have lost their minds...but I don't think they are that far gone.
edit on 24-5-2015 by michaelbrux because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 24 2015 @ 02:34 PM
Adirty bomb maybe at best but a dirty bomb can get very nasty... things are getting nasty guys!

new topics

top topics

<< 1  2   >>

log in