It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

ISIS nuke threat heightened.

page: 1
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:00 AM
link   
ISIS closer to buying Pakistani Nuke


Islamic State has claimed it is 'infinitely' closer to buying a nuclear bomb from Pakistan and smuggling it into the US. An article, apparently penned by British hostage John Cantlie for the terror group’s magazine, Dabiq, says the scenario is 'more possible today than it was just one year ago'.


Looks like this could get the ball rolling for Obama to finally get boots on ground in Syria.

Obama: Boots on ground if ISIS get nukes

Could be interesting times to come. The Assad chemical weapons against children didn't persuade the public to go to war in Syria, but I'm sure ISIS with a nuke will help sway public opinion.


edit on 23-5-2015 by socketdude because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:06 AM
link   
And how are they supposed to buy a Nuke. It's not like you can just go to the Nuke Shop and buy one off the shelf, and even if they get their hands on a Warhead, what's the chances they can successfully detonate it...Dirty Bomb at most?



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol

Yeah, sorry - I was waiting on you creating the thread, but since you didn't I went ahead and did it.
?
On topic, who knows? The problem is people didn't give the Nazi's much credit before their unfortunate rise to power. We know they have the money, so perhaps IF they can get the nuke, another world power who has an interest in attacking the US might aid them.... Russia? China? North Korea? Who knows.
edit on 23-5-2015 by socketdude because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol

And one more thing,

Who cares about the how's and why's of getting a nuke -- the real question is why the MSM is telling us this?

Just 2 years ago, Obama failed in persuading public opinion to go to Syria over Assad's chemical weapon use. Him AND Cameron left it to public vote.

If the general public believe ISIS have nukes... (whether they do or don’t) ---we'll all vote YES to go into Syria.

Which leads to another question? What's so important in Syria? Why the interest?
edit on 23-5-2015 by socketdude because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: socketdude
a reply to: Soloprotocol

Yeah, sorry - I was waiting on you creating the thread, but since you didn't I went ahead and did it.
?
On topic, who knows? The problem is people didn't give the Nazi's much credit before their unfortunate rise to power. We know they have the money, so perhaps IF they can get the nuke, another world power who has an interest in attacking the US might aid them.... Russia? China? North Korea? Who knows.


I dont believe for one minute Russia, China, North Korea and Pakistan would ever sell a Nuke to anyone in the knowledge they would use it in a terror attack. That would be a Huge mistake to make.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol

Yeah well, again, I'm not really concerned about the "nuke".

-- I'm concerned about being **fed the information** that ISIS is closer to acquiring a nuke.

You understand where I'm going with this?

There's an agenda to go to Syria. Just like the WMDs in Iraq/Afgan. This is history repeating itself.
edit on 23-5-2015 by socketdude because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:37 AM
link   
Maybe they are buying one through Saudi Arabia as a proxy.

Saudi Arabia 'could buy Pakistani nuclear weapon'



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
Maybe they are buying one through Saudi Arabia as a proxy.

Saudi Arabia 'could buy Pakistani nuclear weapon'


LOL! Looks like it is as simple as going to the nuke shop then!

And soloprotocol: I quote, "Off the shelf" -- lol, can't make it up can you?


Saudi Arabia intends to buy an "off the shelf" nuclear weapon from Pakistan, according to US officials quoted in The Sunday Times.

edit on 23-5-2015 by socketdude because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:49 AM
link   
a reply to: socketdude

Whilst I wouldn't doubt the potential to buy a nuclear device off a capable nation, I would doubt their ability to get it into the USA.

Any device of any significant yield would be far to large to simply smuggle on a plane or in a boat/ship.

If they managed to acquire such a device, they are for more likely to use it on a ME target.

Sounds like some kind of weird propaganda coming from ISIS, or misreporting from the news.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:52 AM
link   
a reply to: woogleuk

Yes, I'm inclined to think the same. Considering it's coming from a man under duress of beheading as well.

Main point is, Obama claims he'll get boots on ground in Syria "if" ISIS get nukes. There's a reason obama wants to go to Syria, and he needs an excuse.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 04:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: socketdude
a reply to: Soloprotocol



You understand where I'm going with this?


Yeah, I do now...

If the Media doesn't put out the lie our governments have no control over the masses they are elected to serve.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 04:05 AM
link   
Daily Mail and Rt arent exactly the best sources out there, this isn't to say ISIS couldnt or wouldnt buy a Nuke. I would imagine they have already, if one hasn't just been gifted to them for a future goal.

And for the kicker, Veterans Today is reporting that Israel dropped a Neutron Bomb on Yemen.....
Nuetron Bomb LOL



A video received from Yemen, believed to be taken May 20, 2015, of an explosion, when analyzed by nuclear weapons experts is, by very high probability, a neutron bomb that could only have been an Israeli attack. The analysis:

A. Its not a conventional 2k lb bomb. It’s much bigger.

B. Its either a very large MOAB bigger than 4,000 lbs. or; ???? Max weight for an F-15 / 16 is about 2,000 lb payload per bomb rack making the deployment of a MOAB impossible.

C. Its appears to be a small neutron bomb. The size, color, lightning effect and duration of the fire ball being suspended in mid air and the very large mushroom cloud is the main give away. The CCD cameras imaging device was “scintillating” (detecting Neutrons) That is the white pixel flashes in the video. When the photo has white pixel flashes in it, that is because it is being hit by neutrons from the nuclear fireball blast. It overloads the ccd’s electronic circuit producing white flashes.

If the radiation is too high it will burn out the chip. They ha big problems with this in Japan with the Fukushima robots cameras failing due to very high radiation counts.

D. Delivery is most likely by an IDF F-16 with a Saudi paint job on the plane. They are not even hiding their use anymore, they just don’t publicly admit it and the IAEA does nothing or says nothing. That is the true war crime. The UN just ignores it unless the US, France or GB complains…….. Russia and China say nothing.

E. This is now the second known use of nukes in Yemen by Saudi Arabia…………..

edit on 23-5-2015 by Thorneblood because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 04:17 AM
link   
Well I guess Allah will have some friends soon if ISIS can acquire a nuke.

If ISIS does acquire this and tries to use it against the US all I can say is get your life in order, because it is going to end quickly.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 04:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Thorneblood




And for the kicker, Veterans Today is reporting that Israel dropped a Neutron Bomb on Yemen.....


Gotta just love Veterans Today...such a great place for the truth.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 04:23 AM
link   
a reply to: socketdude




Which leads to another question? What's so important in Syria? Why the interest?


I thought it was about what Syria didn't have that has caused the ruckus - a central bank. IIRC they were one of the few countries left without a CB. Not unlike Libya which also had to be brought down. If you don't play nice with the IMF(International Banking Cartel) then bad things tend to happen to you.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 04:23 AM
link   
Recently i watched a documentary: Everything is a rich mans trick. And at the end he says, what is next? Nuclear bomb on USA soil.

And i would suggest to you Americans to give green light to Obama to go and make money for the big corporations in the Syria. Because it is better to go now, when nuclear bomb didn't explode, than go later when bomb will explode, because if anything is true in the documentary i have watch, then this evil people are more than ready to detonate a nuclear bomb on USA soil just to make money.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 04:37 AM
link   
There really isn't a single nuclear armed country stupid enough to give ISIS a nuke, even ISIS's handlers.

What wouldn't surprise me is a "handler" nuking themselves or an "ally" and blame it on ISIS.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 04:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheSpanishArcher
a reply to: socketdude




Which leads to another question? What's so important in Syria? Why the interest?


I thought it was about what Syria didn't have that has caused the ruckus - a central bank. IIRC they were one of the few countries left without a CB. Not unlike Libya which also had to be brought down. If you don't play nice with the IMF(International Banking Cartel) then bad things tend to happen to you.


Damascus is the longest standing, populated city and holds a symbolic power. As the bible states "when Damascus fall"...

They form an alliance with Russia and Iran two of the wests staunch adversaries to western ME ideology.

And of course the MOST import, what you said above.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 04:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
Maybe they are buying one through Saudi Arabia as a proxy.

Saudi Arabia 'could buy Pakistani nuclear weapon'


Yeah i have to agree, I mean coming out and naming your dealer is way stupid, even the dumbest of junkies wont do that, well maybe for a cigarette and a coffee they will but you get the picture.
I cant but help to think to myself that this is some kind of wierdo curve ball.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 05:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
There really isn't a single nuclear armed country stupid enough to give ISIS a nuke, even ISIS's handlers.

What wouldn't surprise me is a "handler" nuking themselves or an "ally" and blame it on ISIS.

Yeah, it's not like a scene from the Life of Brian and they are haggling over the price of a Beard here.

Someone stupid enough to sell a extremely dangerous weapon to a extremely dangerous man should know that that same weapon could be used against anyone, Including the idiot who sold it. Imagine if Pakistan sold a Nuke and it was used against India..
edit on 23-5-2015 by Soloprotocol because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join