It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While I wouldn't rule that out, it wasn't my intent to suggest that he was lying. You mention "his particular vantage point", and "he isn't alone"; who else had his vantage point if he wasn't alone?
originally posted by: 111DPKING111
As you suggest, he is straight up lieing or he isnt, however he isnt alone...
originally posted by: draknoir2
a reply to: funbox
There's the tendency to try and lump all sightings into a single category that will allow "ETH" to be the single explanation.
That devils have visited this earth: foreign devils: human-like beings, with pointed beards: good singers; one shoe ill-fitting—but with sulphurous exhalations, at any rate. I have been impressed with the frequent occurrence of sulphurousness with things that come from the sky. A fall of jagged pieces of ice, Orkney, July 24, 1818 (Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 9-187). They had a strong sulphurous odor. And the coke—or the substance that looked like coke—that fell at Mortrée, France, April 24, 1887: with it fell a sulphurous substance. The enormous round things that rose from the ocean, near the Victoria. Whether we still accept that they were super-constructions that had come from a denser atmosphere and, in danger of disruption, had plunged into the ocean for relief, then rising and continuing on their way to Jupiter or Uranus—it was reported that they spread a "stench of sulphur." At any rate, this datum of proximity is against the conventional explanation that these things did not rise from the ocean, but rose far away above the horizon, with illusion of nearness.
originally posted by: draknoir2
a reply to: Scdfa
Don't forget the possibility of sentient technology.
While I wouldn't rule that out, it wasn't my intent to suggest that he was lying.
You mention "his particular vantage point", and "he isn't alone"; who else had his vantage point if he wasn't alone?
The research subjects in this research got many details wrong in their recollections and I don't accuse any of them of lying: