It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO on CERES 180 Degree Turn?

page: 1
13
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 16 2015 @ 07:37 AM
link   
I wont post links to the articles but ufosightingsdaily and secureteam10, who we all know by now, are posting information saying they found a ufo doing a 180 turn on CERES.

Here are a couple of images.





Here is the original NASA source.

photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...

I would like to think it is simply space debris, asteroids or dirt but I cannot prove this. Someone care to shed some light please.


edit on 16-5-2015 by _BoneZ_ because: Removed All-Caps from thread title. MOD NOTE: The Use Of All Caps In Thread Titles




posted on May, 16 2015 @ 07:45 AM
link   
With Ceres being the largest object in the asteroid belt, it's bound to pick up "companions". Those sites are not exactly credible. Remember the story about something hitting a train, right before the one that derailed? They've even turned that in to a UFO story.



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 07:48 AM
link   
what makes the picture really unusual is the movement is occurring right at the bright spots. Its easy for posters to make prosaic explanations but you common sense tells you its strange.



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 07:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Jinzetsu

I'm seeing similar image artefacts all over the place in that gif.



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 07:51 AM
link   
I wish them luck. I hear the odds of successfully navigating an asteroid field are approximately 3720 to 1. Based on my simulator training in the '80s, I'd have to say that's about right. A lot of quarters died to bring me that information.



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 07:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Jinzetsu

Here's closer look at the animated giff from This thread.


Speed adjusted version by VoidHawk .

It may be an artifact.


edit on 16-5-2015 by gortex because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 07:52 AM
link   
I am aware of everything you have said and agree.
The problem I am facing here is not a matter of "what" but rather "how" or "why". If I was a conspiracy nut job I would reply with something like, "Oh yeah asteroids make 180 degree turns right?" You know? Just saying its space rocks doesn't cut it for them, you have to show them proof.

Not to mention that the supposed UFO passed over the region of CERES that is illuminated which they claim is a UFO base with lights.



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 07:52 AM
link   
Whatever that black dot transiting the GIF images in the OP link it isn't blurds, blets or blugs, the images aren't taken from earth.

So whats it?



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 08:03 AM
link   
The two images from the gif are separated by another frame that shows no such blemish, and surrounded either side by no blemishes.

They are also not showing continuous footage, so you are therefore not seeing anything make a 180 degree turn, you are seeing two entirely unrelated things that are far more likely to be glitches than spaceships.



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 08:04 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

They're everywhere, don't just concentrate on the single crater.



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 08:07 AM
link   
a reply to: gortex

Why, thank you, Gortex, those were even better. The problem I have with that blip being an artifact on the cameras part is it moves from image to image, it transits the POV of the imager, while Ceres remains fixed.

The other problem is that to even be visible up close in multiple frames like that the relative enormous velocities of both objects would have to be similar and the object very close to the lens, dare I say… posing?

Someone who knows this subject and the other thread enlighten me…



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 08:07 AM
link   
a reply to: gortex

Thank you for the post. What page is that from?

Nevermind. Found it.
edit on 16-5-2015 by Jinzetsu because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 08:08 AM
link   
It's artifacts, they are visible on both the NASA Gif, and the one derived from it at above, and they are on most frames. It is not a UFO doing a U-turn, they are two separate artifacts, and again, each one has the same characteristics in each frame they appear on.
The two frames below show artifacts, ringed in red, two on the first frame, one or more on the second. You can look at the whole NASA gif frame by frame when you click on the gif here, (the frame control is hidden at bottom right of the picture)

gfycat.com...#


go to here for the magnifyer,

files.abovetopsecret.com...

go to here for the magnifyer,

files.abovetopsecret.com...


edit on 16-5-2015 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 08:10 AM
link   
In the moving pic you see the so called artefact fly an arc following the arc ridge of crater. Yeh them artifacts are everywhere but this prominent and obvious one seems to know how to navigate an arc length following crater rim



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 08:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: intrptr

They're everywhere, don't just concentrate on the single crater.


So 'noise', then. Except the one big black one appears to be moving in a straight line across the field of view?

Noise could be caused by interference from the oofo, though. Or its "radar"?

Just speculating, not close minded about it.



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 09:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: intrptr

They're everywhere, don't just concentrate on the single crater.


So 'noise', then. Except the one big black one appears to be moving in a straight line across the field of view?

Noise could be caused by interference from the oofo, though. Or its "radar"?

Just speculating, not close minded about it.


It looks that way, but the frames have been *selected and cropped and the scene is made darker by increasing the contrast. On the full gif the round ringed mark you mention is in other frames as well and lighter, plus the other black 'fluff' seen in most frames. Check them all out here, gfycat.com...


* "Selected frames cropped around crater with white spots. Contrast increased by gamma correction. Each frame is shown for 0.2 seconds, first and last frame 1.0 seconds, and repeated backwards."



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 09:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: intrptr

They're everywhere, don't just concentrate on the single crater.


So 'noise', then. Except the one big black one appears to be moving in a straight line across the field of view?

Noise could be caused by interference from the oofo, though. Or its "radar"?

Just speculating, not close minded about it.

* "Selected frames cropped around crater with white spots. Contrast increased by gamma correction. Each frame is shown for 0.2 seconds, first and last frame 1.0 seconds, and repeated backwards."

Aww, not Raw Nasa, but manipulation of their data?

Thanks smurfy, always a pleasure.



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 09:16 AM
link   
No way a signal being beamed 257 million miles in 1s and 0s (analog) , picked up here on Earth via receiver after flowing through our atmosphere, carried by cable for miles and then decoded to digital could contain errors? Or could it ?



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 09:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Jinzetsu

I posted the first mention of these dark spots yesterday on the original thread and the post was mostly ignored by those gushing over the bright areas. Now, I see that the argument has been reduced to only the two spots near the crater. There are actually three. What about the third one, very similar to the other two that clearly can be seen as a smaller dark area before it becomes (apparently) enlarged. It is clearly a near or on the surface feature and not a camera glitch.

The entire video strip needs to be released for us to make a better determination. Showing individual images is simply a crazy way of denying what was really imaged. I'm open to any interpretation IF we are given the full, known facts. As it is, I peg it as simply another conspiracy from TPTB. And if UFOs/ETs are genuine--as they definitely are--then is no reason to dismiss indicative data out of hand as so many do on ATS.

(It is amazing the strong arguments here against those dark areas being UFOs yet the objectors are entirely open to concepts of life of some sort causing those bright areas! Very typical of the government's position on UFOs: "They ain't here, but we'll look billions of light years away for their signals and planets." It just doesn't make good sense unless you have an agenda of advancement toward a quieter acceptance of the remarkable fact of life IS elsewhere.)



posted on May, 16 2015 @ 09:31 AM
link   
a reply to: gortex

reminds me of lights of earth from space.

hrmmm.... that's no reflection.




edit on 16-5-2015 by grey580 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
13
<<   2 >>

log in

join