It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
a reply to: Kapusta
He did it. They fully admit he did it. They kept the 'not guilty' because they wanted to blame the older brother saying it was the brothers fault and he pushed the younger into doing it. No sane person buys that.
Tsarnaev Defense Admits Guilt
"They have all kinds of evidence. They have video of Dzhokhar dropping his backpack behind the eight-year-old that was killed," Hunter said. "He makes a phone call to his brother and then all the heads snap left, you assume upon seeing the first explosion down the street."
The defence said they won't sidestep his guilt, calling the attack senseless, although Tsarnaev has entered a plea of not guilty. The prevailing theory among legal analysts is that this trial will be about whether Tsarnaev lives or dies, as 17 of the 30 charges laid against him carry the possibility of the death penalty.
"We take no issue with the facts from the ground that week," Hunter quotes Judy Clarke, one of America's foremost
death-penalty defence attorneys. "It WAS him. So why are we here? Where we differ is, Why? How did we get from this to this?" Clark asked, holding up a photograph of Tsarnaev as a happy teenager, followed by one of him and his brother Tamerlan at the time of the attack.
show me evidence from his mouth that he said "I am guilty "
His lawyer admitted he was guilty. He agreed with his lawyer. He could have dumped him at any time or stood up and said 'I didn't do it the lawyer is wrong'. At ANY TIME he could have. He did not.
HE DID IT.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: Kapusta
According to you and the MSM hogwash you have been eating .
Nope. According to HIM. He and his lawyer admitted he did it.
They stood up in the courtroom and freely said he did it.
He's no 'patsy'. He's a cold blooded,unrepentant, mass murderer.
According to you and the MSM hogwash you have been eating .
originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: Kapusta
According to you and the MSM hogwash you have been eating .
No. You need to pony up a little proof that this guy is a patsy. Coming on board and just saying, "LOL MSM propaganda sheeple" is the crapiest argument you can make.
Why do you think he's a patsy? Who set him up? For what reason? How were all the people that would need to be involved kept quiet or in the dark?
Do you think it impossible that there are crazy assholes that do this sort of thing? It's happened throughout history. Were they all patsies controlled by the NWO?
This kind of smug condescending nonsense is one of the main reasons people think conspiracy folks are all stupid jackasses.
originally posted by: Excallibacca
I love how they're reporting that when the verdict came down, he was emotionless. They say he scratched his chin. That shows you right there how much of a monster he is.
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: FlyersFan
I"m against the death penalty in most cases.
In this case, he deserves death.
I'm against the death penalty, period.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Death is too good for terrorists
40 years of hard labour in Alaska until he is too old or too sick to work any more then one day somebody drags him outside and puts a bullet in his head and sticks him in a pit somewhere.
originally posted by: jaws1975
It's threads like this that have convinced me that either ATS is a honeypot or that the majority of posters lack the ability to use critical thinking.
Put down the pitchforks and torches and inform yourselves as to the numerous inconsistencies of this case before saying really ignorant things.
Thanks asktheanimals and kapusta for being the voice of reason here.
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Kapusta
According to you and the MSM hogwash you have been eating .
Then by all means explain to us the reason why the verdict isn't the right one?
I mean you call it all hogwash...show us the way.
originally posted by: lambros56
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Kapusta
According to you and the MSM hogwash you have been eating .
Then by all means explain to us the reason why the verdict isn't the right one?
I mean you call it all hogwash...show us the way.
I agree with Kapusta.
There's plenty of videos out there that shows it was staged.
I found this interview by John B Wells really good and think it's worth taking the time to watch and then give your opinion.
Unfortunately I can't post the video but here's the link....
m.youtube.com...
originally posted by: Greathouse
I don't believe in the death penalty. Anyway 60 years of solitary confinement at Supermax would've been far worse.