posted on May, 15 2015 @ 10:36 AM
originally posted by: yuppa
DID I SAY HE BELIEVED IN A PERSONAL GOD? No i DID NOT. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Please calm down. I don't care that you didn't say it, I didn't say you did. I SAID IT because you claimed he was religious, so I wanted to clarify
that. He was not religious aside from his upbringing and didn't adhere to any specific religion later in life, so calling him religious is a bit
As for your second point.Where DID I state it was a fact? I am Sooooooooo sorry that i Should had said SCIENTIST instead of just using SCIENCE
You said "Its mighty big coincidence how life started according to science. "
You are wrong because that is NOT according to science. Science requires factual repeatable testing to confirm things. Abiogenesis is not confirmed,
so you are attributing something to the scientific view that isn't actually a standpoint of science. It is a possibility, based on some evidence, but
not enough to confirm it.
The issue concerns the very laws of nature themselves. For 40 years, physicists and cosmologists have been quietly collecting examples of all
too convenient "coincidences" and special features in the underlying laws of the universe that seem to be necessary in order for life, and hence
conscious beings, to exist. Change any one of them and the consequences would be lethal.
So what? The universe is huge. Even if the chance of that happening is one in a one billion, it's still inevitable because there are hundreds of
billions of stars in this galaxy alone. Its faulty logic to make assumptions about the probability of life emerging when we have only seen it on
earth so far. It could be all over the universe, or it could be very rare. We simply don't know that yet, so assumptions are pointless.
You seem to be singling me out So Im going to ignore your replies from now on.
I'm not singling you out, I would have said the same thing to anybody who made those claims, and I have actually made those same exact points to
plenty of others that say things like "life is a fluke", something we can't possibly know without more information. You can believe whatever you'd
like, just please try to avoid characterizing science as a conscious entity or attributing "beliefs" to science that aren't actually scientific
positions. Wasn't trying to be mean or anything, I apologize if it sounded that way.
edit on 15-5-2015 by Barcs because: (no reason given)