It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Xcathdra
Backed by what. A 'pound' of sterling silver? "Currencies" are worthless if they aren't backed up by tangible assets. China is laying the ground work by purchasing tons of gold… guess why?
On the other hand, America's gold is… somewhere…
Gold is not the only asset that can be used to back up exchange media, it is just one of the more portable. Unlike land, manufactured and agricultural goods , other industrial metals and minerals, gold has no inherent value. Saudi Arabia does not need to back the Riyahl with gold.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: intrptr
If you were stranded on a desert island, which would you rather have: a pound of gold or a gallon of fresh water?
As for the acquisition of large amounts of gold by the notoriously non-transparent Chinese government, it is worth remembering that gold remains a popular possession in Asia. People will give gold jewelry and gold coins as New Year's gifts. Some percentage of the gold the government has been acquiring is being used to mint gold coins that are given as gifts in China and collected by nervous American investors.
originally posted by: DJW001
If you were stranded on a desert island, which would you rather have: a pound of gold or a gallon of fresh water?
originally posted by: Telos
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Telos
originally posted by: DJW001
The blogger says that China made an attempt to create a global currency when it considered going on the gold standard three years ago! Why are you posting a three year old rumor as though it were something current?
Can you stop hijacking the thread ? Using reference from past actions are tools that help a current argument and the level of understanding it. How hard is to get that?
Excuse me, what is the point of this thread? China has been talking about creating an alternative to the US dollar as an international reserve currency for years. It seems no closer today than it was three years ago. Do you want to discuss whether it is serious about this or not? It seems that it is just a bluff to assert its economic superiority over Europe and Russia.
The point of this thread is not for you to decide. If you've got nothing to say than just stay away from it. I appreciate your opinion and inputs but whether the thread is worth or not, that's something mods decide. You either put up or shut up.