It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But the agenda of global warming is not good
Define "they." You mean "TPTB?" Good question.
Why don't they actually do something about the global warming if it is so bad?
originally posted by: mc_squared
a reply to: jrod
The irony is that the real reason the public terminology was rebranded is so people like that would go around saying stuff like "climate change? climate changes all the time - it's obviously just a natural cycle!!"
Frank Luntz himself explains the exact reasoning right here at the 2:47 mark:
I think Fyrebyrd's post summed it up already:
originally posted by: Fryebyrd "But low education people who lack critical thinking and discrimination skills are easily hoodwinked by propaganda and other rhetorical tactics that confuse."
PR professionals like Luntz have always understood this. It's why we have leaked memorandum showing this has been their target audience since the very beginning:
originally posted by: guitarplayer
My post was in response to why climate change opponents do not listen to climate change claims. My question to the oil field geologist is that even with evidence contrary to what a person has been indoctrinated, taught there are biases that still remain that hinder a new paradigm shift in thinking.
originally posted by: AVoiceOfReason
nothing with the prefix elementary can be used to describe a system as complex as the planet we live on. the reason ts so hard to understand the theory is because it seems like once a month we get news that climate scientists are manipulating and\or ignoring data.