AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Military and Government Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


Leaving bases can only mean one thing???




Topic started on 5-6-2003 @ 03:59 PM by K_OS


There has been a growing trend since right before the second gulf war... The U.S. is pulling out of some countries and moving bases in others.
As many of you remember it has not been that long ago since we pulled out of Saudi Arabia and now we are moving in South Korea Story here:.


Is this signs of things to come? Is the fact that we are moving these bases at times that are convienent with us having a problem with boardering countries forcasting a new war?

Not since the cold war have, we done as much open spying. Even as we pressure other countries, we are pressuring our own rights.

Every time a large company collapses, it seems to have ties with the government...Did they find out too much??

We can not find Saddam or Osama, were they merely pawns employed to concur the grander plan?? Their convienent dissapearance at this time seems to lean toward the reason that maybe "we" are hiding them.

Some things for you all to ponder...

_____________________________________________
Be Cool
K_OS



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Military and Government Projects topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 5-6-2003 @ 04:06 PM by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf


Well, its high time we moved out of Germany anyway, since the cold war is over.

probelm is, were not moving back home, were moving elsewhere where we shouldnt be.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-6-2003 @ 08:56 PM by Abraham Virtue


You are seeing the Military Industrial Industry driving it's campaigns for war. They make war in order to make profit. They have to. That is real big business. Just ask Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Bush.

They all know very well.

They know that the bases need to be more fruitful to their own initutives.

I think that this type of insider trading is the worst of all.

That is what this is.

It is a sick way of running the system.

Any time there is a power vacuum it always attracts the most dirt.

This is a dirty situation.

We seem to be cleaning things up, but we are only sucking up own own demise. One day we will be overloaded, and we will explode.

The vacuum will be gone and the mess will be our fault.

We need to stop these corruptors.

They light the fire, and they corrupt aganist us all.

They are the ones spoken of below.

Only God loves them.

Don't listen to the Sura.

It lies.

Allah loves all.



Abe

[Edited on 6-6-2003 by Abraham Virtue]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-6-2003 @ 12:21 PM by phoenix_cross


all i know about the base changes and withdrawls is that they've been in the works for sometime. not the last week type of some time, lets try on the last few years. at first i thought this all nothin more than a repositioning, but with all the battles goin on right now, and the war on terror, this all seems to be something more. i know a larger reason for the move south in SK is that out of the two thousand or so artillary pieces on the north side of the dmz, they could all hit up our forces pretty hard. if we move south then seoul is in the way, and the coriolis effect would put a lot of the shells into the middle of the oceans and seas and stuff over there. i think that if we had to invade the north, instead of pulling a large scale land invasion like in iraq, we'd probably try a naval landing. normandy style ya? that's the last thing people would expect. we still have a large number of landers, and we could get them over there pretty quickly. this whole NK thing is too much speculation, and it's confusing to know what exactly will happen.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 7-6-2003 @ 04:05 PM by f16falcon


Originally posted by K_OS
As many of you remember it has not been that long ago since we pulled out of Saudi Arabia and now we are moving in South Korea Story here:.


they've been in korea since the 50's



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-6-2003 @ 01:46 PM by Reap


After reading an article in last weeks paper senior members of the British armed forces are openly stating that we would be unable to mount any large scale war for numerous months due to lack of all ranges of munitions and rotation of forces.
how would we have coped against an equal foe?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-6-2003 @ 12:00 PM by Gazrok


With us getting out of Saudi, it should give back some needed credibility for the Saudi royals...(the Saudi populace were never thrilled with the royals allowing us to be there in the first place). Of course, it's almost equally likely, that without us there, they may just be ousted after all...

Getting out of Germany is long overdue...they don't want us there, and with the end of the cold war, there's no longer a need.

As for finding Saddam...it really isn't (was never) needed. the removal of his regime was the goal, and it was accomplished. Osama, however, is another matter entirely. With him still free, the threat is still there (unlike with Saddam).



   copyright & usage 




















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.031 seconds
Page processed in 0.088 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.