It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Metallicus
He is anti-2nd amendment. Deal breaker for me.
originally posted by: Metallicus
He is anti-2nd amendment. Deal breaker for me.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: luthier
How will he split the vote?
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: LDragonFire
Did he seriously just take that stance?!
a reply to: luthier
How is it not possible in America?
Talk about naive.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: luthier
How will he split the vote?
He is an independent. So he can run opposed to hillary. He isnt going to be getting many conservative votes but he will get some of the democratic votes. Every election for decades has been split down the middle republic dem with a very small margin. I think this time that small margin will be sanders taking not enough to win but enough that dems dont either.
originally posted by: HighFive
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: luthier
How will he split the vote?
He is an independent. So he can run opposed to hillary. He isnt going to be getting many conservative votes but he will get some of the democratic votes. Every election for decades has been split down the middle republic dem with a very small margin. I think this time that small margin will be sanders taking not enough to win but enough that dems dont either.
He is running on the democratic ticket. He will get the nomination or not. There won't be a Ralph Nader situation like 2000, where he draws votes from the democratic nominee, allowing a moron Bush to tank the economy.
originally posted by: LDragonFire
Rand Equates socialized medical care as slavery.