It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
The event was put on to incite. Anyone thinks it wasn't has their heads buried in the sand. This interview was held to incite. Anyone that doesn't see this is oblivious. Let's face it. You KNOW what type of response you will get from some people. I think it's a sad state of affairs when sensibilities are thrown into the ditch for a political motive.
So people shouldn't be allowed to draw the pictures?
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
The event was put on to incite. Anyone thinks it wasn't has their heads buried in the sand. This interview was held to incite. Anyone that doesn't see this is oblivious. Let's face it. You KNOW what type of response you will get from some people. I think it's a sad state of affairs when sensibilities are thrown into the ditch for a political motive.
So people shouldn't be allowed to draw the pictures?
Didn't say that. I said it was put on to incite. The 1st allows it but let's not blow smoke up our asses. This was put on to incite Muslim hate. To make a political point.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: beezzer
They are allowed, no one is saying they are not allowed.
I haven't seen anyone say that it needs to be outlawed, have you?
Just that this particular event was not a very smart one and done with hate in mind not just free speech.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
The event was put on to incite. Anyone thinks it wasn't has their heads buried in the sand. This interview was held to incite. Anyone that doesn't see this is oblivious. Let's face it. You KNOW what type of response you will get from some people. I think it's a sad state of affairs when sensibilities are thrown into the ditch for a political motive.
So people shouldn't be allowed to draw the pictures?
Didn't say that. I said it was put on to incite. The 1st allows it but let's not blow smoke up our asses. This was put on to incite Muslim hate. To make a political point.
And "Piss Christ" was created to make butterflies happy instead of sad. . . . .
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
The event was put on to incite. Anyone thinks it wasn't has their heads buried in the sand. This interview was held to incite. Anyone that doesn't see this is oblivious. Let's face it. You KNOW what type of response you will get from some people. I think it's a sad state of affairs when sensibilities are thrown into the ditch for a political motive.
So people shouldn't be allowed to draw the pictures?
Didn't say that. I said it was put on to incite. The 1st allows it but let's not blow smoke up our asses. This was put on to incite Muslim hate. To make a political point.
And "Piss Christ" was created to make butterflies happy instead of sad. . . . .
That has what to do with the topic? Deflection dude.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
The event was put on to incite. Anyone thinks it wasn't has their heads buried in the sand. This interview was held to incite. Anyone that doesn't see this is oblivious. Let's face it. You KNOW what type of response you will get from some people. I think it's a sad state of affairs when sensibilities are thrown into the ditch for a political motive.
So people shouldn't be allowed to draw the pictures?
Didn't say that. I said it was put on to incite. The 1st allows it but let's not blow smoke up our asses. This was put on to incite Muslim hate. To make a political point.
And "Piss Christ" was created to make butterflies happy instead of sad. . . . .
That has what to do with the topic? Deflection dude.
Piss Christ has everything to do with the topic.
It was "art" with the intent to incite religious convention.
Who cares?
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: intrepid
The event was put on to incite. Anyone thinks it wasn't has their heads buried in the sand. This interview was held to incite. Anyone that doesn't see this is oblivious. Let's face it. You KNOW what type of response you will get from some people. I think it's a sad state of affairs when sensibilities are thrown into the ditch for a political motive.
So people shouldn't be allowed to draw the pictures?
Didn't say that. I said it was put on to incite. The 1st allows it but let's not blow smoke up our asses. This was put on to incite Muslim hate. To make a political point.
And "Piss Christ" was created to make butterflies happy instead of sad. . . . .
That has what to do with the topic? Deflection dude.
Piss Christ has everything to do with the topic.
It was "art" with the intent to incite religious convention.
Piss Christ. Not seeing the correlation.
Serrano has not ascribed overtly political content to Piss Christ and related artworks, on the contrary stressing their ambiguity. He has also said that while this work is not intended to denounce religion, it alludes to a perceived commercializing or cheapening of Christian icons in contemporary culture.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: beezzer
Who cares?
I do, I don't want this lady propped up like some freedom fighter when she could give to flying #s about freedom for anyone that doesn't agree with her.
I don't care what the MSM has to say, I don't watch it.
It doesn't take more then 5 min to see what this ladies views are.
Shoot she even defended that guy that went and killed all those kids in Norway cause some of them were "mixed" and were getting indoctrinated.
Class act for sure.
originally posted by: beezzer
It was "art" that many in the Christian community took offense to.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: beezzer
It was "art" that many in the Christian community took offense to.
That's been going on for centuries. To compare that to an event that people KNOW will incite a reaction(that's what they want) is ridiculous.
Secondly, Christians. The most thin skinned species on the planet.... from my recent observations.
So we should silence her?
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: beezzer
So we should silence her?
Is that what I am saying?
Please show me where I said that.
She can spew his nonsense all she wants, and I have every right to call her a bigot and hateful person for doing it.
And to say that her event was dumb and dangerous and not needed.