It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Brain Fingerprinting? Is science about to change how we look at ourselves/the law?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 22 2004 @ 10:55 AM
link   
This is a very interesting article that covers a variety of topics related to brain research. It begins with the story of a guy in prison who had his murder conviction overturned because his 'brain imprints' didn't match the neurological responses that would have, supposedly, been apparent in the man who actually committed the crime. It goes on to discuss how things like mind control, brain scans and 'brain fingerprinting' are about to revolutionize not only our society but also how we look at ourselves:
abcnews.go.com...

"All of that has stirred the concerns of a number of scientists, including Martha J. Farah, a psychologist with a varied background who now directs the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Cognitive Neuroscience. Farah, who earned a bachelor's degree in metallurgy and a doctorate in psychology from Harvard and then entered the young field of neural science, believes we are treading in dangerous waters in a field we have only barely begun to understand."
""Technical progress is making it possible to monitor and manipulate the human mind with ever more precision through a variety of neuroimaging methods and interventions," she says in an essay in the current issue of Trends in Cognitive Sciences. While that may lead to wonderful advances in such things as treatment for the mentally impaired, it also will certainly lead us into areas where no human has gone before."



The big questions, in all of this, revolve around the concept of the sentient 'self', I believe. Do these advancing technologies reduce the human mind by compartmentalizing it (by making us JUST the sum of oyr parts), or are big questions regarding consciousness being sidestepped so that everything fits into a neat, scientific package? Also, in utilizing techniques that break human thought down into observable reactions, are we ignoring the fact that we still don't understand how the raw act of consciousness itself works... and, in so doing, might we jeapordize the lives of individuals?


But... here's the part of the article I KNOW most ATSers will go nuts over:
"And if we can peer deeply enough into the brain, we ought to be able to figure out who among us is likely to molest a child, blow up a police station or commit an act of terrorism. That's one reason the Central Intelligence Agency is helping fund an Iowa company that developed the brain fingerprinting technology that gave Harrington his freedom."


[edit on 22-12-2004 by onlyinmydreams]




new topics
 
0

log in

join