It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Couple faces 15 years behind bars after a grandma records them having sex on Florida beach

page: 5
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in


posted on May, 6 2015 @ 12:58 AM
a reply to: hounddoghowlie
That is also a possibility. I guess there are plenty of them.

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 05:30 AM

originally posted by: Nyiah
Hubby thinks they should get between 10 & 12 for it, on account of 15 being too stiff a punishment in his opinion. All things considered, they deserve as much as anyone else boinking in any other public space should get. IMO, no less than 10. If you're OK with going all primitive & doing the deed where ever you see fit, then do the damn time, no matter how long it is. And if anyone thinks it's too long versus something like a sentence for murders is, then maybe you should be questioning the light sentences for murders, not screwing in public, KWIM?

I don't get people... I think its because it was a beach.. but I have taken my kids to the beach many times.. to me, this is like going to the McDonalds playground and screwing. or going and doing it at applebees when families with kids are present..

would they call it a mistake if they had their kids in tow at the grocery store and had to walk by a couple who couldn't wait til they got home?

The mindset of anyone who thinks screwing in a public place is just fine, or that people shouldn't get punished for it is ridiculous!

There is something seriously mentally wrong with anyone who would screw in front of kids!
edit on 6-5-2015 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 05:51 AM
a reply to: OpinionatedB

Absolutely spot on. And good thing this is a public story. Hopefully less inconsiderate people will populate family friendly zones if they plan on doing 18+ activities.

Do so in a nightclub that is full of trashy woman sure, Or at home okay. But not in a public place where the kids have their childhood ruined by inconsiderates!
edit on am5u3115Wed, 06 May 2015 05:52:31 -0500 by AnuTyr because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 05:55 AM

originally posted by: AnuTyr

Do so in a nightclub that is full of trashy woman sure...

Ah, been to the Mons Venus or the Pump House, eh?

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 06:00 AM
15 years. what a joke.
but the children, the children.
cause everything is always about the children.....

so a few kids catch a glimpse of 2 people doing the deed and their world is so shattered that the people need to be punished with more time in jail than they give murderers and rapists?

i dont understand.

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 06:04 AM
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

just cause the law says this or that is lewd, does not mean that i think it is.
so yeah

one of them could have beat granny to death with her iphone and been given less jail time.
talk about a broken system

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 06:14 AM
Well, there is a reason that we are viscerally opposed to seeing the base physical functions of other humans- defecating, eating, sexual activity- generally people are uncomfortable watching others engage in these things.

There is a reason for that. We aren't animals, and we ought not to behave like animals.

Of course, prison time for something so trivial is ridiculous, but I think that's so obvious that it doesn't even need to be said.

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 06:22 AM
Once again, I shake my head in disbelief at the utter nonsensical and illogical actions of a US court system, and those who defend the ridiculousness of sentencing.

15 Years? 15 days would have been considered harsh in most of the civilized world, where it would probably have been a fine and nothing more. But, it's 15 years AND added to the sex offenders register? Seriously? Talk about screwed up!

As for the whole "should have taken the plea deal" nonsense, this is another issue that is laughable in the US "Justice" system. So many times I have seen accounts from people stating they took the plea deal, even though they were not guilty as charged, but did so to get a lighter sentence, as advised by their defence.
As such, the prosecutor gets another notch, the more they get the better it looks on their resume come election time! Also means the revenue increases in fines from plea bargained innocent people just trying to keep out of the corrupt and illogical legal "system". I am sure in this case too the plea deal included several years in jail, but why should people, if they are innocent, be forced to plead to something they didn't do, just to allow the accepted broken system to stay in place?

Also, some seem to think that as he had a prior felony against him and did jail time, he must be some dangerous drug kingpin and society is better off with him in jail. How very judicial of them! Any prior felonies had nothing to do with this case and, knowing how the US system works, the time he spent in jail previously was probably for simple possession, and doesn't make him some machine gun wielding menace to society.

The US is so F****d up already but seems to be getting worse year on year.

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 06:36 AM
a reply to: Mugly

Seriously.. you would think it just fine for a couple to go to a McDonalds playground and have sex?

Because this is the exact same thing.. people take their kids to the beach to go play, just like they would a McDonalds playground..

This was a family beach.. same as McDonalds has a family area and playground for kids..

If you think its okay to just decide to up and be rutting animals in public in front of other people's kids, then there is something wrong here..

In the end - leave my children and the raising thereof to me, I don't let my kids watch porn.
edit on 6-5-2015 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 07:00 AM
a reply to: OpinionatedB

if theyre caught having sex at a mcdonalds playground then they should get the chair or the gas chamber
i mean, the children

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 07:33 AM
One time a neighbor from down the road stored by the shop I work at looking for her dog that just ran off. She had her 2 kids with her. When she found the dog, he was under the porch next door banging another dog. The lady's kids asked "Mommy, what are they doing?"

Better sentence those dogs to 15 years in the pound for that lewd behavior in front of innocent children.

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 08:12 AM
they should have killed the 3 year old kid.
they would not have had as much jail time.

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 08:14 AM
should had said.
"hes pushing the other dog out from under the porch"

originally posted by: Aldakoopa
One time a neighbor from down the road stored by the shop I work at looking for her dog that just ran off. She had her 2 kids with her. When she found the dog, he was under the porch next door banging another dog. The lady's kids asked "Mommy, what are they doing?"

Better sentence those dogs to 15 years in the pound for that lewd behavior in front of innocent children.

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 08:18 AM
a reply to: alienjuggalo

and so wait--did the creepy pervy grandma get charged?!

sounds like she should! doesn't that violate some peeping tom/filming porn without consent law? She sounds like the real sex offender here. I mean, seriously. Who does that?!

Use your smartphone to DIAL THE POLICE not FILM A FREAKIN PORNO.

That's all kinds of creepy. Yeah so was the couple having sex in the open but come on.
And 15 years for having sex?!

You've got to be kidding. Now, show me the kids who saw it--if any of them did--and I might reconsider my judgement. But I say these two lovers should get like a fine or something. Being sex offenders is kinda bad enough considering they weren't like soliciting children to join them or something. They're not criminals--just skanks. How embarrassing. That's punishment enough.

It takes a real special kind of jerk busybody to film two people illegally having sex. Most people would be happy simply telling the authorities. Sounds like the old lady is just jelly school and did it due to her own insecurities and not for any public good. Therefore, I say she should be charged with something. What she did sounds malicious.

Anyway, I agree that it takes a sick person to have sex in front of kids. But the 20 year old is basically still a kid--and I think it's fairly obvious the 40 year old is taking advantage of her. And it was likely the 40 year old's idea. I'm thinking the 20 year old chick is kinda a victim in all of this. She's young and stupid. But she shouldn't be a sex offender. Maybe she needs some counseling or a life coach or something but all of this seems a bit much. Hopefully she has a good lawyer and can do a juvenile diversion program since she's under 25.
edit on 6-5-2015 by rukia because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 08:28 AM
Wow 15 years.. Really?

I understand that it's inappropriate behavior with children in the vicinity but 15 years and having to register as a sex offender is a tad extreme...

it's only sex after all, it's a perfectly natural, human thing to do.. yes these people used very poor judgment but there is no need to give them such an extreme sentence.... they should have manned up and admitted their guilt instead of lying about it.

i agree that children need to be shielded from certain things but this sends a message that having sex is something to be ashamed of when it isn't... obviously i don't condone their behavior, i just believe that going to these kind of extremes for such petty misdemeanors is the main reason the justice system is completely useless....

we live in a world were people who take liberties with children regularly walk away without conviction, Politicians sleep with prostitutes and bankers steal from their clients without a damn thing being done about it and yet these people are having the book thrown at them for nothing more than getting carried away on a public beach....

They are both idiots for putting themselves in this situation... and surely if they are being prosecuted for the act the person who filmed it should also face criminal charges for some kind of privacy violation, filming without consent... i have no idea what the law says on that regard in Florida but it seems to me whoever did the filming should not be free from prosecution...

i would be interested to know if the prosecuting attorney is up for re-election anytime soon because this stinks of political agenda... just my opinion

edit on 6/5/2015 by Ph03n1x because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 08:57 AM
Yes, yes, as per ATS, Where's the film or this didn't happen?
By the way what's all this"they could have made a deal" trick? If I'd have been caught doing something that I thought I was innocent of being offered a deal would like being slapped in the face and I would have fought for my innocence.
Yes, I understand if you fight the case it would cost the courts more money but if you are innocent just to offer a deal is a complete travesty of justice.
And by their criteria if found guilty they would increase the fine or sentence, what if you fought the case and proved your innocence you aught to be allowed to claim massive compensation for defamation of your character. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 09:36 AM
Wow so there going to get a longer sentence than a pedophile, great job right there.

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 09:47 AM
Based on a recent case in Florida, I thought it was also illegal to record someone without consent. Or dose that law only work for the protected groups?

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 11:28 AM

originally posted by: mOjOm
I'm not saying they shouldn't be in trouble as it is against the law. But 15 years??? They would have got less time had they killed that same grandmother.

originally posted by: Dimithae
They should have just killed someone instead,they would have only gotten 7 years.

This was my point, the justice system is putting ALL witnesses at risk with sentences like this. We have reached a point, where severely inuring a witness, results in the same level of punishment. Therefore its safe to assume that severely inuring a witnesses will become standard operating procedure among hardened criminals. Heck, cops are operating in a pretty similar way when people film them breaking the law.

Mark my words, one day, hardened criminals are going to start taking names when they get convictions and those witnesses/do-gooders are going to be in a world of hurt for doing what they "thought" was right. Remember we are not dealing with the typical Boomer ex-con or GenX ex-con, we will be dealing with Millenial ex-cons, with a TOTALLY different mentality, ala the Virgina Tech Shooting or the Aurora Shooting. The US government has set up a system where the convicted lose everything, with little chance to repair their reputations. There will be unintended consequences stemming from such policies.

posted on May, 6 2015 @ 11:36 AM
a reply to: alienjuggalo

So they had sex in public in front of people that did not consent to watch.....I am glad and hope they serve jail time. This is a public place were families hang out.

Right is wrong.....left is right.....Morals compass is pointing in every direction. Also before you say, come on this is not that bad it was witnessed by entire families.......YA it is bad.
edit on 6-5-2015 by SubTruth because: (no reason given)

new topics

<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in