It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
A surprisingly little media attention given to the seized ship and it's crew in the U.S.
Reports that Maersk officials are meeting with Iranian people over the issue but no participation by the U.S.? Even with U.S. citizens aboard?
This report is 5 hours old at the time of the thread.
www.presstv.ir... ommander
Iran claims it's a financial dispute between Maersk and an Iranian company and will release the ship, cargo and when paid 10 million dollars. Failing that payment, Iran will sell the ship and it's cargo.
Who'd buy it?
This is how one handles financial dis[putes? While it might spike the price of oil and make a little more on their oil exports, it does nothing to enhance their reputation as leaders that can be trusted with a nuclear weapons program...
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: crazyewok
Grasping at straws again, I see.
I "trust' the Saudis, and the other five ME countries, do not trust Iran.
I 'trust" Netanyahu has better control on the Mossad than any President has had on the CIA.....
originally posted by: nwtrucker
The blood will also be on you and those that argue against blocking that development in the here and now.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
You'd better explain how Bush and Blair failed stopping IRANIAN nuclear development.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
All you suggest is allow Iran to duplicate N.K.'s nuclear development. It is completely contradictory.