It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Involutionist
So there is registry? Because two posters above mentioned there was non.
originally posted by: TheBolt
I don't understand your point here. Why act extra polite when carrying a concealed weapon?
Why act differently at all. IF the idea is to have the "just in case" protection, which I do get, why not go about life the same way with or without a gun.
You also said that I display ignorance about laws because they would make it harder for law abiding citizens to get access to guns. To me that's the point of a law. It doesn't discriminate. It would make it more difficult for anyone to get a gun.
originally posted by: Involutionist
Why do YOU feel you need a gun?
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: Involutionist
Why do YOU feel you need a gun?
Because I really don't like spiders.
ETA: also I have a tiny penis.
originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: Answer
They may not have an official federal registry, but I somehow doubt they aren't at least keeping records of everyone that goes through their background checks in the states that require it.
originally posted by: Involutionist
a reply to: Answer
Because I really don't like spiders.
ETA: also I have a tiny penis.
Buy a sports car instead...or is the gun used for influencing potential mates to give into your needs?
I don't mind spiders at all, they eat pest...
Poetic indeed.
If you have to question OUR 2nd Amendment Right.........then you don't get it.
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: moniker
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: Leonidas
a reply to: smirkley
Except that isn't true everywhere else where Free Speech is a right, but gun owning is not.
Nobody is going to take guns away from Americans, it just wont happen. But the paranoia surrounding the 2nd Amendment continues in spite of that fact.
By the way, many would argue that the rest of the Rights enshrined in the Constitution exist under the protection of the 1st Amendment, not the 2nd.
Heck, they even put them in that order!
Right, they thought freedom of speech was paramount, but they thought the right to keep and bear arms was jsut as important--that's why they put it just after.
That is a common misconception about the American constitution. It doesn't in fact provide any rights. That is not how it is set up.
Provide? No
Protect? Yes