It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

So here's a really, really dark conversation. Hypothetical of course!!

page: 4
12
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

I would just stop labeling myself an atheist.

Instead I would just be a guy who doesn't believe in God(s).

I guess that would still make me an atheist.

edit on 4-30-2015 by WakeUpBeer because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 10:18 PM
link   
I'd get rid of all you other dudes. I'd be quite popular with the ladies then.




posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 10:24 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

I used to date a woman who worked for the CIA and I have a neighbor whose son still does. They are not much fun and you get zip as far as conversation from them on anything that counts. The best I've gotten was a twist on the old, "If I told you what I know, I'd have to kill you", line and it was "If I told you what I know, you would kill yourself!" Yeah, fun at parties to be sure. But the Secret Service, now THAT's a whole different ballgame. Those boys can party! Just ask Jack Kennedy. I think the only "secret" they have is why they still get paid.



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 10:32 PM
link   
a reply to: BennyHavensOh




And frankly, I would be really interested to see exactly what kind of world those left behind will have after we white people have been eliminated. I have a feeling that it would be very interesting, and extremely entertaining in an Edi Amin kind of way. Besides, a lot of us worthless white people are getting really damned sick and tired of hearing how damned evil we are and killing us will, at some point, be a lot less painful than having to listen to all of the whining from those that have no other talent or ability than to whine can generate. Bring it on.


America would be worse than the movie "Idiocracy" within 100 years. It would be 98x's more violent. Mexicans would take over the farming, blacks would take over entertainment, Middle Easterners and Asians would come in and take over business, it wouldn't be "completley" different than today as time goes on. But there would be major race wars for many years, the same inequalities, the same religious quandering, just no whites to "Bleach" the colorful DeUnited Sectors of Amafrikokyo.

I am white, have experienced my fair share of racisim towards me, when the worst I have done to another of different race was to repeat their words right after they said them to other people. If Whites are unable to use workds that Blacks use, maybe Blacks could just use their African language or start their own instead of speaking a White language. Since they relish their slavery ancestory, and still believe it affects them today, they could learn their pre American language and use it to express themselves however they choose. That's my opinion. Blacks take such pride in their race yet many in America at least know jack #e about history, even African history, even African geology. Most couldn't name over 5 countires out of 56 or so in Africa (LeBronland isn't one yet).

If Blacks today believe they have the right to act how they act, they should at least have viable and justified reasons for it. Many do not know they facts to anything, they are just reactionists, and they are ore to blame than anyother race. They support viololence in 99% of music and entertainment they create, yet they do not want violence on their race by another race, I guess since they had enough of it from Whites, but now it's pimp balla G'thug playa time to shoot some gang --iggas from the hood for wearin that blue shirt in a red hood and spoke to a female I once plugged. That is ok in 2000 World, but if a white cop does anything to a black arrestee, Afropocalypse, loot the world, whine when the good tv's are gone, blame the whites for buying them. Oh what a world. thanks MSM.



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 10:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: OpenEars123
Ok I've had some excellent responses, and thank you for them all.
But let's get down to the nitty gritty.

If you could wipe out a lot of people at once, as in exterminated. Who would it be? It's hypothetical, so no answers are solid, but probably honest.

I would refer you to what George Bernard Shaw (learned play write) recorded about what he thought the fate of anyone deemed 'infirm' was to be; lethal injection-neutered; realize he was a Nazi sympathizer.
edit on 30-4-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 10:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: FaceMyBook
a reply to: OpenEars123

Was blacks looking down on whites the hypothetical part?

Is that some weird British thing?

Me too, questioning. What happened to the suggestion of a Black apocalypse in the OP opening statement? I think it involved some sort of hissing through the teeth at the white populace that is occurring in Britain.



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 10:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: BennyHavensOh
a reply to: vethumanbeing

I used to date a woman who worked for the CIA and I have a neighbor whose son still does. They are not much fun and you get zip as far as conversation from them on anything that counts. The best I've gotten was a twist on the old, "If I told you what I know, I'd have to kill you", line and it was "If I told you what I know, you would kill yourself!" Yeah, fun at parties to be sure. But the Secret Service, now THAT's a whole different ballgame. Those boys can party! Just ask Jack Kennedy. I think the only "secret" they have is why they still get paid.

The pressure of the job must be getting to them?



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 10:54 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

I cannot conceive how they can handle any of it myself and have absolutely NO idea why anyone would want to be the keeper of a "secret" of any kind. Information, in order to be of value, must be shared openly and freely. Perhaps I am simply not suited to be part of this system, but that is how I am.



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 10:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Metallicus

HAHAHAHA.....this from the same person who said that if it was proven that there was no god he would go on a killing spree before killing himself.


Religion may be the only thing that keeps psychopaths in check you have shown me that.


I said that without God there is no reason NOT to do those things, but if your spin makes you happy then fine with me. Also, you don't have to be religious to believe in God.

I also would choose myself before I chose another human being. I said 'atheists' to see who would take the bait. Thanks for being that guy.



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 10:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xeven
I'd get rid of all you other dudes. I'd be quite popular with the ladies then.


Not with that avatar; but then mine is no better/worse; more innocent perhaps.
edit on 30-4-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 11:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: BennyHavensOh
a reply to: vethumanbeing

I cannot conceive how they can handle any of it myself and have absolutely NO idea why anyone would want to be the keeper of a "secret" of any kind. Information, in order to be of value, must be shared openly and freely. Perhaps I am simply not suited to be part of this system, but that is how I am.

They don't take the "oath" secrecy to that office seriously (not like the Marines). Good thing you are not a Free-Mason; we need the founders of the Constitution NOW living in the flesh and bone. You are part of the system (just like me) timing is everything.
edit on 30-4-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 11:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

Don't worry, I am not in the mood to pull up your post to show what you actually said contrary to what you claim here.

You should rejoice because you have shown me that there is a use for religion in this world.



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 11:13 PM
link   
a reply to: WakeUpBeer

Actually that would make you closer to the definition of an agnostic...

Someone that has thought about the subject of a supreme being, and has realized that the answer is yet to be discovered...
and has not decided to weight in on the subject...

Pretty much where I am at...

cheers...



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 11:13 PM
link   
a reply to: WakeUpBeer

Actually that would make you closer to the definition of an agnostic...

Someone that has thought about the subject of a supreme being, and has realized that the answer is yet to be discovered...
and has not decided to weight in on the subject...

Pretty much where I am at...

cheers...
edit on 30-4-2015 by coastlinekid because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 11:29 PM
link   
a reply to: OpenEars123

Ok I just want you to clarify, when you say religious nuts, are you referring to ALL human beings that are not ATHIEST such as yourself, or just the Westboro Babtist Church, Al-qaeda/ISIS types?? Because I am not even Christian and I have volunteered many times with local churches for charity drives, bake sales, and soup kitchens. It would be a damn shame that you want those people dead even when they are helping people just because they choose to believe in something you do not.

Has anyone said most of the House of Representatives and the Senate yet?? Because that den is completely overrun by vipers. Oh and ALL corporate lobbyists that outspend the regular citizenry for their representatives time concerning their districts issues.

These are the ones that actually run things in the world, not your "religious nuts" . Quite amazed you would have no problem killing off innocent Christians and others simply for practicing faith and not even mentioning the ACTUAL warmongers who reside near the top (but not quite at the top) that pass the legislation that make global human suffering possible.



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 11:33 PM
link   
a reply to: coastlinekid

Nah..he got it right.

If one does not believe in deities that is all that is necessary.



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 11:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

Surely you can see why the most religious lobbyist is more evil & detrimental to the world than an atheist. Were you being facetious or are you really that conditioned?



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 11:48 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Payday loans shops should be on the list. And people who send chain letters!



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 11:54 PM
link   
a reply to: FaceMyBook

I would actually say that athiesm is a greater threat than religious fundamentalism. See the average Athiest is much more hateful, resentful, and hostile towards your average Christian/Muslim/Jew/anything else than the average C.M.J.A.E. is toards athiests. I watch athiests regularly spit on people of faith, pray for their deaths (why is an athiest saying "I pray you die" anyways). Not to mention I have yet to see anyone start an athiest group with a mission statement of helping the less needy in their local communities. I have volunteered with good mannered athiests at Church events that were for a local community cause. That is right, even athiests show up with my crazy all out American free Speech self to church events that make a positive impact in the immediate community.

Where are the athiest groups though that want to show the world we do not need religion to help solve local community issues and people in need? Spending too much time hating and preaching Godlessness, praising themselves on their thrones of superiority lamenting the fools for helping out needy people instead of indulging in themselves no doubt.

I still think if we are not killing off corporate lobbyists, and the corrupt politicians they help finance then this entire thread and the input of its users is probably not where it should be, you know, the actual source of most of the problems getting blamed on religious nuts??



posted on Apr, 30 2015 @ 11:56 PM
link   
a reply to: DYepes

That was my point exactly, religious view shouldn't come into it whatsoever.

Humans & human institutions are the problem.




top topics



 
12
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join