It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NOT a plane and likely NOT a blimp - SAN DIEGO LIGHTS

page: 11
52
<< 8  9  10    12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 7 2015 @ 03:07 PM
link   
The news station reported several callers called in to ask about the lights. Anyone living in, around or familiar with that area would already be used to seeing those antenna lights on that mtn top. Its clear from what the news station reported that people were seeing something they clearly did not recognize.
edit on 7-5-2015 by taccj9903 because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 7 2015 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: JadeStar

Oh and then there was the whole April 2015 - Worldwide RC UFO hoax thing..


You changed the date from 2014 to 2015.




Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Worldwide UFO Hoax (False Flag) Scheduled For April 5, 2014

edit on 5 7 2015 by CosmicRay because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a reply to: CosmicRay




You changed the date from 2014 to 2015.


Nice catch! I'm sure it was just a typo, of course



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 04:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Staroth




Here's a video that has someone videoing the TV screen as the news aired. Starts at 20 secs. That's all I can come up with...so far.


Interesting that someone would video the video playing on TV, yeah? Almost like a backup, in case the news story were to magically disappear from existence or something...



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 04:19 PM
link   

edit on 5 7 2015 by CosmicRay because: nevermind, I missed a page.



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 05:25 PM
link   
a reply to: WeAre0ne

the region of interest red strobe is NOT in synch with any visible ground light. that was gone over very early in this thread.

that being said, others have made more compelling arguments FOR this phenomenon being a reflection (cranes, skyscraper construction lights, etc). however, now there are questions about why the tv station has clamped down on inquiries into the story. so either the crew screwed up and filmed reflections, or a classified military blimp/drone, or a true UFO.

hope we find out which.



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Staroth

staroth - that daylight photo of the hillside communication complex looks EXACTLY like the night shot.

So - case closed?



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 05:46 PM
link   
a reply to: drphilxr

Look closer my friend, on perhaps a good size screen and also re-size it!


edit on 7-5-2015 by Staroth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 06:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Staroth

Of course it's the same source. The two photos are taken at different distances and angles.



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Staroth

I think you solved it Staroth - case is closed!

** BRAVO ** !! this is the cool stuff ATS can do - debunking is as good as any good conspiracy.




posted on May, 7 2015 @ 06:42 PM
link   
a reply to: drphilxr

What's with the animosity? Are you having a bad day?



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 07:10 PM
link   
So it's going to be Cerro Colorado to the east of Tijuana with that sign on the side of the hill saying 'JESUCRISTO ESELSENOR' and looks like this in daylight is it? Seen through a telephoto lens the foreshortening effect would make it look closer compared to the foreground.


edit on 7-5-2015 by Imagewerx because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 07:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Staroth

What? um, i said "bravo" in the spirit of "good work" - should i assume since ATS is so full of trolls that you assumed I was disrespecting you by complimenting you?

Staroth, good job. GOOD job. Not sarcastic. Not belligerent. Sheesh!



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 07:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Imagewerx

Here's a closer view





edit on 7-5-2015 by Staroth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: drphilxr

Forgive me, my apologies.
edit on 7-5-2015 by Staroth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 08:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Staroth
a reply to: Imagewerx

Here's a closer view






So the writing is the white lights in the video ?

Also, why did that drone match up so good ?

That was a clear night. No fog at all.

I would say debunked for now...Unless we this odd shape again.



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 10:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Staroth
a reply to: drphilxr

Look closer my friend, on perhaps a good size screen and also re-size it!

j
CASE CLOSED



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 10:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: ufoofinterest

source: www.nbcsandiego.com...



source: ufoandalientruthnetwork.com...


This goes to show that even people that seem so sure about their own debunking can be dead wrong.



posted on May, 7 2015 @ 10:43 PM
link   
Fun thread...


A good debunk keeps everybody sharp.

I just want the truth...Warts and all.



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 02:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: whyamIhere

originally posted by: Staroth
a reply to: Imagewerx

Here's a closer view






So the writing is the white lights in the video ?

Also, why did that drone match up so good ?

That was a clear night. No fog at all.

I would say debunked for now...Unless we this odd shape again.


No,the writing is not illuminated.It's either room lights in the buildings at the base of the masts,or more likely as they're quite bright is car headlights parked next to the buildings.

There never were any drones.You can't keep a drone 100% static even inside a windless room,outside even more impossible as none of the lights ever move relative to the background.

The fog excuse was just a poor cop out by the reporter after realising he'd made the biggest b*****up of his career,there never was any fog.Heat haze on a hot and humid night as they have in Mexico would cause the shimmering effect and general loss of definition of objects some distance away

I'd say definitely 100% debunked for all time.




top topics



 
52
<< 8  9  10    12 >>

log in

join