posted on May, 12 2015 @ 01:11 AM
originally posted by: AthlonSavage
I have worked out a triangle.
You've worked out no such thing. I'm not going to waste my time figuring out where you get your intial numbers (I suspect it's quite dodgy,
though). Regardless, you're then substracting arbitrarily chosen numbers from them, and the "triangle" you come up with (using thise arbitrarily
chosen numbers) isn't a triangle, given that each angle has, per one of your previous posts, a margin of error of around 7%, which is quite
The points that you work out from that "triangle" (which again, are highly suspect), are not direct hits, or anything even close. Your "hits" are
all over the place as well. Statistically speaking, there is an enormous difference between 1.84 km away and 4.99km away (your lowest and highest
values), not to mention the fact that they all vary in direction.
Write down a series of random numbers, then apply the same dodgy math as you did here. You'll find quite similar results.