It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You are conflating property with personal damage, and the two are not the same. Theft is NOT rape. Life DOES have more value than property, and that includes protecting and not harming and not injuring life. In cases where life is going to be harmed, I am all for taking necessary measures, but I personally do not see that any 'thing' is worth harming any life.
That is my own personal code.
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
a reply to: Boadicea
And I would not have a problem with that. Your things are not more valuable than life....NOTHING is more valuable than life.
You don't really get to decide:
1. What other people value, and
2. The manner in which the individual chooses to defend his property.
If your friend attempts to rob someone, gets shot and dies, and you start a riot because "blah blah life and value"--then you are part of the problem.
originally posted by: tallcool1
a reply to: jessme2
Well if they are charging at me with hate in their eyes - I am not going to wait and see if they want to harm my family or not. Why the "F" do you support people infringing on other people's rights and property anyway? Come at me or my family with violence in your eyes and get met with far more violence than you are bringing.
Unlike you and others - there's no way in HELL I would take that gamble with my family's safety. No way.
originally posted by: ukslave
a reply to: Boadicea
sweet, can i come now and take all your hard earned stuff??
if you are happy to be robbed then i'm sorry, you are a mug!
Yes, you're right. It's not my choice. It was already decided on a far greater level than my own. It is the law of the land, our organic law, one of those natural inalienable rights endowed by our Creator, and codified into law.
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
a reply to: scattergun
Good post.
I tried to explain in other threads that when a real revolution happens there will be opportunists looting, but that's why we have the right to bear arms.
I wouldn't blame a business owner for using lethal force to defend their livelihood, I would do the same.
The issue I have is that the media focuses exclusively on the looters without telling us what the revolutionaries are doing, it is a smear campaign to hide the fact that police departments have become beyond corrupt.
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: tallcool1
a reply to: Boadicea
So just let them in to steal your stuff, beat the crap out of you and rape your wife and daughters.
Yes, I would let someone steal my stuff before I killed them in cold blood. Like I said, nothing is more valuable than life. It is also the law. As for beating the crap out of me and raping my wife and daughter... nothing was said about a beating, just looting, so it doesn't apply. I don't have a wife either, I have a husband, so that doesn't apply either. As for someone raping my daughter, yes, I would fight for my daughter, and if that meant killing the perp, I would have to live with it. My daughter's person is much different than things that can be replaced.
Sorry - any bastard tries to harm my family and they'll get a dose of lead poisoning. I may end up in prison, but that's a small price to pay to keep my family safe.
Again, nothing was said about harming one's family in the post I responded to... People are not things.
beginning in 1894 when oil-and-railroad tycoon Henry M. Flagler contrived a scheme to get rid of blacks who lived on his island-paradise creation -- Palm Beach. At first Flagler hired thousands of unemployed black laborers to help build the Royal Poinciana Hotel and transform the island from a swamp to an opulent landing spot for wealthy socialites along his Florida East Coast Railway.
The workers, who lived in a Palm Beach shantytown called the Styx, toiled through the summer for the promise of a steady income. But when the hotel was completed, Flagler realized that his chichi guests wouldn't fancy staying at a hotel, however posh, if blacks lived in shacks nearby. So in reward, ostensibly, for completing the hotel on time, Flagler sponsored a carnival on the opposite side of the Intracoastal, in what later became the city of West Palm Beach. While the workers and their families enjoyed the festivities, Flagler had the Styx set ablaze, according to the book "Palm Beach Babylon," a social history of sorts that gives detailed accounts of island scandals. The Styx was razed, but Flagler created for his workers a new town to be built on property that he already owned north of the carnival site. That property became Pleasant City...
(For the full article: www.newtimesbpb.com...)
originally posted by: greencmp
I don't believe in incremental measured defenses, they tend to encourage incremental measured assaults up to and including rape and murder though the expeditionary violation may have been merely against property.
Given your line of reasoning, apparently you do not know or understand the foundation of our law, nor the definition of inalienable rights. I do not have time to educate you.
In the end, though, you're right. We all have free will and can be as good or as horrid as we choose to be... and then face the consequences -- legal, moral or natural.
If you want to hate on me for preferring to be good to people and live my life to a higher standard (in accordance with the law) you can.
Obviously. And I can think what I will of those who put things before life.
But I'm not a cop. I won't be putting you in jail. All I have is an opinion. My opinion won't hurt you...
but I already know you will hurt me. Thanks for the heads up!
originally posted by: ukslave
a reply to: Boadicea
I have a feeling that you may well be a princess in several Nigerian villages
Do you not feel that your hard earned possessions are worth fighting for? If not why the hell would you put in all the hours to earn them?
Im not saying i would break the neck of some guy trying to pick pocket me...