It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bb23108
Wow! I just caught up with this thread and am amazed at some of the bs you are posting. A lot of this must have been while others were away too, given how much you said without too much retort.
originally posted by: Entreri06
You do know that almost every bit of the 3rd eye, adrenal gland stuff can all be traced back to one fraud who wrote self help books right? All the "crystals are magic" y"you just gotta uncalsify your adrenal glad" garbage comes from one book in the 60s or 70s. There are no anchient texts or shoulin monasteries that put spiritualism out there. It's from for profit self help authors taking advantage of drugged up hippies.
Where in the world did you come to believe the third eye was created in the 60s? What mysticism did you say you read?
At a very minimum, at least check Wiki before spouting off these kinds of terribly uninformed misconceptions - it may help you to decide not to.
originally posted by: Entreri06
The concept of heaven and everything that you consider a "soul" is a FAR more modern creation with a paper trail the same as Mormonism.
Good Lord. More of the same terribly uninformed misconceptions.
originally posted by: Entreri06
There isn't. I got all into every mystical, religious, spiritual thing I could devour!
What mysticism did you actually read? From just these quotes above, I can't even imagine! It sounds like you got swindled on whatever books you bought if those are your conclusions about the origins of these matters. Or else you missed something in them.
originally posted by: Entreri06
I always do think the way almost everyone mixes spiritualism, mysticism and religion into a crazy coctail of faith is intresting. If ones true, then the others are not. You don't get to pick and choose what you do and don't like.... Well personally you can :p but don't expect me to buy it !! :p
You do make a point about people revising various truths to fit their specific agenda. I see this constantly with New Age spirituality that often misses the true message of non-dualism that the adept realizers of non-dualism were always consistently making.
Many New Agers think they are enlightened because they have some kind of mental insight into the truth of non-duality; and then some even start offering weekend seminars about "how you can be enlightened too!" based on some misconception about non-dualism.
However, there are many ways that various spiritual traditions are truly the same - and this is most evident in comparative mysticism where there are many parallels between diverse traditions because they are dealing with known structures in the subtle body-mind - such as the Third Eye.
So in a very real sense, I do not buy your statement that "If ones true, then the others are not." Truth is the truth regardless of which tradition speaks of it. One can find it is consistent in various traditions certainly to one degree or another.
Anyway, please look a bit more deeply into these traditions before you go off about them as though you really are some kind of expert in them.
So after all is said and done, you can make all the arguments you want, but they do not actually prove that you are only the body.
proof |pro͞of|
noun
1 evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement: you will be asked to give proof of your identity | this is not a proof for the existence of God.
• Law the spoken or written evidence in a trial.
• the action or process of establishing the truth of a statement: it shifts the onus of proof in convictions from the police to the public.
• archaic a test or trial.
• a series of stages in the resolution of a mathematical or philosophical problem.
2 a trial print of something, in particular:
• Printing a trial impression of a page, taken from type or film and used for making corrections before final printing.
• a trial photographic print made for initial selection.
• each of a number of impressions from an engraved plate, especially (in commercial printing) of a limited number before the ordinary issue is printed and before an inscription or signature is added.
• any of various preliminary impressions of coins struck as specimens.
3 the strength of distilled alcoholic liquor, relative to proof spirit taken as a standard of 100: [ in combination ] : powerful 132-proof rum.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: bb23108
The way you just characterized it, shows that you are not sensitive to this matter and much less, how to speak with dying people about it. In fact I have spoken to people on their death bed and they do understand something about being beyond the sheer physical meat body. I was able to do this recently with my father-in-law and he very much appreciated it.
Not even a nice try, LesMis - your statement certainly does not obviate what I said about everything anyone ever experiences is psychic (perceptual) in nature.
This is completely obvious, and once you start living on the basis of this truth of your actual situation here, you will not feel so separated from, and superior to, others. Then perhaps your treating many of us the way you (or at least your online persona) does, will be more participatory, open-minded, and respectful.
I am very sensitive to death and the dying. What I am insensitive towards is dishonesty. The way you speak of people as "meat bodies" is dreadful to me. It is no wonder that when you look at them, you need to concoct a story of your own devising given this insidious notion. I sincerely hope they do not see themselves the same way, and that they only allow you to continue to concoct fictions out of respect for your feelings.
originally posted by: Entreri06
That's from spiritualism wiki page. Notice the start date of 1840, not 12000 BC....
originally posted by: Entreri06
I'm searching for the write up on the 3rd eye, penial gland stuff. If memory serves it's from a self help yahoo in the 1960s. That caught on in the 70s hippi counter culture.
originally posted by: Entreri06
What first century Christians believed has almost no resemblance to what modern Christians believe. It is insane to see the difference between the two and impossible to merge the two. I seriously doubt that the farther we stray from the original beliefs, the closer we get to the TRUTH of Christianity. The same goes for every other religion and double for spiritualism being that that spiritualism has no concrete beliefs in the first place.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: bb23108
The way you just characterized it, shows that you are not sensitive to this matter and much less, how to speak with dying people about it. In fact I have spoken to people on their death bed and they do understand something about being beyond the sheer physical meat body. I was able to do this recently with my father-in-law and he very much appreciated it.
Not even a nice try, LesMis - your statement certainly does not obviate what I said about everything anyone ever experiences is psychic (perceptual) in nature.
This is completely obvious, and once you start living on the basis of this truth of your actual situation here, you will not feel so separated from, and superior to, others. Then perhaps your treating many of us the way you (or at least your online persona) does, will be more participatory, open-minded, and respectful.
I am very sensitive to death and the dying. What I am insensitive towards is dishonesty. The way you speak of people as "meat bodies" is dreadful to me. It is no wonder that when you look at them, you need to concoct a story of your own devising given this insidious notion. I sincerely hope they do not see themselves the same way, and that they only allow you to continue to concoct fictions out of respect for your feelings.
it feels like thats exactly what you are saying here though. when we die, our fleshly vessels decompose and "we" just disappear. "putrefaction" was the word you used. and "autolysis"...self-digestion? basically rotting meat sacks. right after you used some flowery language to deride the idea of a soul, of people being more than just flesh. you are sensitive to death yet mock the afterlife, souls, spirituality and everything in between. im finding it difficult to reconcile your opening post with what you say here.
originally posted by: bb23108
originally posted by: Entreri06
That's from spiritualism wiki page. Notice the start date of 1840, not 12000 BC....
You were mentioning mysticism. You only finally mentioned Spiritualism. Mystical practices have been reported for thousands of years, including the 3rd eye.
originally posted by: Entreri06
I'm searching for the write up on the 3rd eye, penial gland stuff. If memory serves it's from a self help yahoo in the 1960s. That caught on in the 70s hippi counter culture.
So you cannot even find the source of what you so "expertly" stated? The third eye has been known as the gateway to cosmic mind since ancient times. It is even referenced in the Bible with the passage "If thine eye be single..."
originally posted by: Entreri06
What first century Christians believed has almost no resemblance to what modern Christians believe. It is insane to see the difference between the two and impossible to merge the two. I seriously doubt that the farther we stray from the original beliefs, the closer we get to the TRUTH of Christianity. The same goes for every other religion and double for spiritualism being that that spiritualism has no concrete beliefs in the first place.
I agree with you relative to Christianity - that the esoteric teachings of Jesus were snuffed out by the exoteric "official" church of Christianity. I have written more posts than I care to count about this very subject.
But to then draw your next set of conclusions from that, is not necessarily correct. There are various disciplines that do not even rely on beliefs because beliefs are just mental constructs that actually obstruct the real spiritual process.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
A closed argument is where the argument can only refer to itself. It is your arguments that are closed, being that they cannot refer to anything else, and one is left in a closed loop when he reads them.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Thanks for at least replying.
originally posted by: AllIsOne
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Maybe my question is beneath you and that's why you chose to ignore it … But how can you explain free will in the context of "we are just atoms"? Atoms are bound by causal laws, free will is not. That is a clear indication that there is more going on that just well organized atoms IMHO.
originally posted by: bb23108
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
A closed argument is where the argument can only refer to itself. It is your arguments that are closed, being that they cannot refer to anything else, and one is left in a closed loop when he reads them.
Your argument that you are only the body hinges only on body-based (physical) proofs, as I already stated in my previous post, and as caricatured there as a medical scientist saying:
"Yep, we cannot get an x-ray of you, Mr. Spirit, so you can't exist! You can go now. Next! Miss Spirit over here! You are sure cute! Oh dear, no x-ray came out. Sorry, but you can't exist either!"
The point I was making is you have a closed loop relative to your argument and its proof. Its proof is limited by the same physicality that is your very argument. No current technology can detect spirit. This is likely someday, since it obviously has observable properties by the subtle mind.
When you get to the subtle world, I wonder if you will then engage in arguments that the even more subtle world (the causal world) can not possibly exist! Probably. I will keep an eye out for this, that way I may easily find you.
I will try to explain the above in a different manner:
Of course our awareness and attention are typically identified with the physical body here. That is what generally results in embodiment here in the first place.
So just because all these body-minds can only manifest tools that are encumbered by this same realm's limits, certainly does not mean we are only the products of this realm. This is what I mean by your using a closed argument.
So if you actually had a visitation from an other-worldly manifestation, would you first try to write it off like Ebenezer Scrooge?
In the end, only the self-evident truth avails - the rest is based in limited mental concepts and dies with the brain, just like you say. Yep, a closed loop there, no doubt.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Thanks for at least replying.
Of course. You too.
originally posted by: bb23108
a reply to: Entreri06
I don't see how that supports your argument that the Third Eye was concocted by someone in the 60s. It clearly was not.
originally posted by: Entreri06
originally posted by: AllIsOne
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Maybe my question is beneath you and that's why you chose to ignore it … But how can you explain free will in the context of "we are just atoms"? Atoms are bound by causal laws, free will is not. That is a clear indication that there is more going on that just well organized atoms IMHO.
Who says we have free will lol?
The chemical reactions in your brain are controlling all of us like puppets. Hell, there are parasites that can secrete this or that chemical and control your every thought and action. Plus you have to add in all the instinctual stuff like a sex drive, territorialism, biological clock to reproduce, secadian rythmes ( sleep drive), none of which can you will yourself to ignore.
Free will is a concept created by religions to explain why we are not born believing in whatever god and to explain why a "loving god" would create monsters.
In reality we are slaves to our brains wiring. Can some one with Autism or bipolar decide Not to be? Can some born attracted to women decide not to be?
originally posted by: bb23108
a reply to: Entreri06
I don't see how that supports your argument that the Third Eye was concocted by someone in the 60s. It clearly was not.
originally posted by: Entreri06
The fore head chakra is not the mystical psychic power third eye you are referring to. That's like saying the Native American sun symbol is a nazi swastika. When thy look the same but have totally separate meanings.
originally posted by: AllIsOne
originally posted by: Entreri06
originally posted by: AllIsOne
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Maybe my question is beneath you and that's why you chose to ignore it … But how can you explain free will in the context of "we are just atoms"? Atoms are bound by causal laws, free will is not. That is a clear indication that there is more going on that just well organized atoms IMHO.
Who says we have free will lol?
The chemical reactions in your brain are controlling all of us like puppets. Hell, there are parasites that can secrete this or that chemical and control your every thought and action. Plus you have to add in all the instinctual stuff like a sex drive, territorialism, biological clock to reproduce, secadian rythmes ( sleep drive), none of which can you will yourself to ignore.
Free will is a concept created by religions to explain why we are not born believing in whatever god and to explain why a "loving god" would create monsters.
In reality we are slaves to our brains wiring. Can some one with Autism or bipolar decide Not to be? Can some born attracted to women decide not to be?
Fair enough. Let's begin the game!
Am I assuming correctly that you think we are a biological entity, made up of only atoms? Your answer is probably a "yes". There is one simple law that governs all atoms: actio - reactio. I posit that humans have the ability to circumvent that law. (Animals do not, because they are bound by instinct.)
We can freely think of anything we want without there being an apparent cause for that to happen. Would you agree? Do you think me thinking of ice cream, quantum flux, or an Eb/F chord at this very moment is only governed by atoms?
originally posted by: Entreri06
But the physical part can be proven, studied, predictions made and every other thing that anyone would consider proof. While there is no actual evidence for ANYTHING metaphysical at all in the first place.
That's like claiming the water is red in changrala (the mystical Chinese city I'm sure I slaughtered the spelling). Then saying we can't prove the water isn't red in changrala . when we have no reason to believe there is a changrala in the first place.......
originally posted by: bb23108
originally posted by: Entreri06
The fore head chakra is not the mystical psychic power third eye you are referring to. That's like saying the Native American sun symbol is a nazi swastika. When thy look the same but have totally separate meanings.
When one turns the attention to the internal energy of the body-brain-mind upwards, and concentrates it in the core of the brain, that is the position of the 3rd eye also known as the ajna chakra. This is where the subtle mind is. This is the gateway to various visions of subtle worlds, etc.
So what is your experience - or at least understanding of this process?