Second Fake Dutch Moon Rock Given To The Queen Of The Netherlands By Apollo 11 Crew!

a reply to: TheWhisper

The only thing senn getting bigger, is your attempts at deception.

No it is not that one that is the one given by Middendorf and the NASA did give it temporary for displaying. TW bets it is also a fake one much to big don't you think. But that is not the fake moon rock Prince Bernhard donated to the Museum.

a reply to: TheWhisper

That is not the same moon rock, it is a temperary moon rock given by NASA. It is not the third fake moon rock Bernhard donated to the museum.

Where is the rock that Bernhard donated to the museum?

originally posted by: TheWhisper
No it is not that one that is the one given by Middendorf and the NASA did give it temporary for displaying. TW bets it is also a fake one much to big don't you think. But that is not the fake moon rock Prince Bernhard donated to the Museum.

Bets? No proof then lol!

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheWhisper

The rock is not examined in our own laboratory, Prince Bernhard got the moon rock as a souvenir donated it to a museum in Leiden.

Good. Then you can provide a picture of that moon rock(s). Never mind, I will do so for you:

The display in Leiden.
bart.volgers.eu...

Please do some research that are 4 rocks, the third fake moon rock donated by the Prince was a single Apollo 11 rock it is clearly stated in the dutch article.

a reply to: TheWhisper

Please do some research that are 4 rocks, the third fake moon rock donated by the Prince was a single Apollo 11 rock it is clearly stated in the dutch article.

Why is it not on display in the museum?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheWhisper

That is not the same moon rock, it is a temperary moon rock given by NASA. It is not the third fake moon rock Bernhard donated to the museum.

Where is the rock that Bernhard donated to the museum?

Well it was fake and is may by still somewhere in the museum in a dusty corner who knows. Its gone their are images of it but they will be not released yet.

It is not looking good for NASA.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheWhisper

Please do some research that are 4 rocks, the third fake moon rock donated by the Prince was a single Apollo 11 rock it is clearly stated in the dutch article.

Why is it not on display in the museum?

Because it is another fake moon rock.

a reply to: TheWhisper

Well it was fake and is may by still somewhere in the museum in a dusty corner who knows. Its gone their are images of it but they will be not released yet.

I see. So the museum would rather display four tiny fake moon rocks instead of a large one. That makes perfect sense...to someone. Not someone with any critical thinking skills.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheWhisper

Well it was fake and is may by still somewhere in the museum in a dusty corner who knows. Its gone their are images of it but they will be not released yet.

I see. So the museum would rather display four tiny fake moon rocks instead of a large one. That makes perfect sense...to someone. Not someone with any critical thinking skills.

Yep as it is to big to be a real moon rock, and the display you refer to is also not on display it is stored. Also the Apollo 17 rock is not on display in the museum. LOL

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheWhisper

Well it was fake and is may by still somewhere in the museum in a dusty corner who knows. Its gone their are images of it but they will be not released yet.

I see. So the museum would rather display four tiny fake moon rocks instead of a large one. That makes perfect sense...to someone. Not someone with any critical thinking skills.

TW has already fond more information, TW can tell you that ATS has opened a can of worms for NASA. They are not telling the truth that is clear.

a reply to: TheWhisper

All you've shown is that a Dutchman was given a fake moon rock by an ex ambassador. The astronauts weren't even the ones that gave it to him. The ex ambassador did, during a visit by the astronauts.

Given the rarity of moon rocks, people have tried to sell fake ones any number of times. NASA busted a woman trying to sell a fake for $1.7 million.

You've in no way proven that anything is fake, other than one rock. And you didn't even prove that. There's articles, in English so the majority of members can actually read it, talking about this very rock as many as 6 years ago. So all you've done is post 19 pages of citing yourself as a source and used circular logic to get absolutely nowhere.

a reply to: TheWhisper

Also the Apollo 17 rock is not on display in the museum.

False. Again.
bart.volgers.eu...

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheWhisper

Also the Apollo 17 rock is not on display in the museum.

False. Again.
bart.volgers.eu...

Well we need to be clear to you that Apollo 17 rock is not on display in the museum. Sad that you cannot debate the real issues.

Two fake moon rocks one given the the Dutch Queen and one given to the Dutch Prince. TW has much more, this are only the breadcrumbs we release here lol.

a reply to: Shamrock6

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: TheWhisper

Well we need to be clear to you that Apollo 17 rock is not on display in the museum.

Apparently, you are wrong.

Two fake moon rocks one given the the Dutch Queen and one given to the Dutch Prince.

The astronauts gave no one a moon rock.
The queen did not receive a moon rock.
Small samples of the Apollo 11 moon rocks were given to the Netherlands and 134 other countries.
None of them were fake.

TW has much more, this are only the breadcrumbs we release here lol.

You mean bullcrap. There seems to be a language problem.

a reply to: Phage

All you say is already debunked. Sorry TW is showing you some truth based on research. It is going to be much worse as this information was already worked out three years ago. LOL

a reply to: TheWhisper

More links to yourself. With articles you refuse to provide an actual translation for, rather than your own paraphrasing and summary.

Do you get dizzy with all the circles you run? This is like talking to a wall. Or a Dutch dike, perhaps.

a reply to: TheWhisper

More promises of "the future."

And yet...you haven't provided anything on the promises you've already made.

You are exactly why mainstream makes fun of conspiracy theorists.

a reply to: TheWhisper

So, three years ago you knew the picture of the queen did not show her examining "her" moon rock? Then why did you post that it did? Your research leaves much to be desired.

I have no doubt that it will get worse.
I have no doubt that you will continue to post bullcrap.