It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: rickymouse
They can come here and practice riot patrol. As long as they eat in our restaurants and support our local businesses when they are off work.
If they don't help stimulate our local economy, then send them somewhere else. Maybe we can supply them with some local actors so they can make it look like a real event happening.
Frankly, if your town floods and you're gonna complain that green beret rode the rope down to get you out of your house instead of a "run of the mill" guardsman, soldier, whatever, that's your problem.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Frankly, if your town floods and you're gonna complain that green beret rode the rope down to get you out of your house instead of a "run of the mill" guardsman, soldier, whatever, that's your problem.
In The Federalist, No. 29, Alexander Hamilton echoes not only Mason’s warning against a standing army, but his solution to the threat, as well. If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist. In commenting on Blackstone’s Commentaries, founding era jurist St. George Tucker speaks as if he foresaw our day and the fatal combination of an increasingly militarized police force and the disarmament of civilians: Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.
originally posted by: boohoo
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Frankly, if your town floods and you're gonna complain that green beret rode the rope down to get you out of your house instead of a "run of the mill" guardsman, soldier, whatever, that's your problem.
Those roles are already fulfilled by the various Air National Guard Rescue Wings, Corp of Engineers and NAVFAC. Special Ops participation is NOT needed nor required.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
I presented a hypothetical situation, which you're now spinning as me saying it happened? In a comment that was neither directed at your not pertained to your comment?
originally posted by: Shamrock6
And again, you made two points. They're not supposed to do it and aren't trained to do it.
I rebutted your point that they aren't trained for it, because they are.
When I was in the military not only did we train for crowd control we also trained for nuclear and biological so I am wondering what makes this news worthy is it because there is a video of the training?
Is it because some ignorant fool added commentary to the video and posted it to youtube?
Consider Bold Alligator, a naval exercise in which thousands of Marines and sailors have been involved in the past. The most recent version was launched last fall, and included amphibious landings to prevent insurgent groups in the fictional country known as Garnet — Georgia and part of Florida in real life — from launching attacks.
In another example, U.S. Special Forces support fictional guerrilla forces in numerous counties across North Carolina in the exercise Robin Sage. Green Beret soldiers work to liberate the country of Pineland, and operate in close proximity to civilians, who are warned that they may hear blank gunfire.
Marine Special Operations troop also have an exercise that is in some ways similar and called Derna Bridge. It spans several counties in western South Carolina, and includes some activities in Sumter National Forest.
originally posted by: boohoo
originally posted by: Rocker2013
Like it or not, all our countries face threats, and like it or not, all of our countries have to be prepared for these things, and that does involve drills and scenario training.
Except, those other countries are not only better at it (because they don't have two oceans protecting them), but they also don't inconvenience the general populace while they train. Other developed countries are discrete and polite about the whole process, the American government is not.
originally posted by: boohoo
Special Ops participation, is NOT needed, nor required, at this time or the future.
As much as no one wants to admit it - there are insurgent groups in America of all makes and ideologies.
The Intelligence Project identified 1,096 antigovernment “Patriot” groups that were active in 2013.
originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
The Koresh fiasco in Waco was bad enough, I'm sure there are other groups out there I don't even know the names of operating under the radar, and hey - fine - whatever - freedom and liberty and all that crap - but when these communes and groups start coming into cities and starting fights, riots or recruitment campaigns advocating and glorifying killing our nations soldiers and politians because of "what they've READ and been TOLD" by their leaders....there's the Greater Good to consider.