It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: turbonium1
Threatening to sue Sibrel, and threatening to kill Sibrel , was really just to get Sibrel to leave the house faster.
It makes perfect sense...
Not.
some americans wont ask, they will just get their guns..
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: turbonium1
Threatening to sue Sibrel, and threatening to kill Sibrel , was really just to get Sibrel to leave the house faster.
It makes perfect sense...
Not.
some americans wont ask, they will just get their guns..
Yes, they are called nut-jobs. They will shoot someone who is trying to leave their property, and afterwards, they explain to the police how they shot trespassers who refused to leave their property.
For some reason, nobody buys that as an excuse for blasting someone's head off, and they end up guilty of first-degree murder. Perhaps if they didn't kill them in the driveway, it'd be more convincing!
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: turbonium1
They are threatening him with legal action because he lied to them, accuses them of fraud and intends to make money out of the resulting footage.
originally posted by: turbonium1
No, I asked YOU why Mitchell threatened to sue Sibrel.
After Mitchell first asks Sibrel to leave, he said...
"And if you continue this, and you press it, I will personally take you to court!"
So you "need" to explain why Mitchell would threaten Sibrel. You cannot ignore it.
What would Mitchell want so desperately for Sibrel to not "continue" with?
What other possible thing would Mitchell not want Sibrel to "continue" with?
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: turbonium1
They are threatening him with legal action because he lied to them, accuses them of fraud and intends to make money out of the resulting footage.
They were lied to, accused of fraud, and profited from showing it on film.
You think that's why they threatened to sue him. They didn't sue him, which is quite a problem for your argument..
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: turbonium1
I believe we're still waiting for you to provide proof that Sibrel paid them.
Proof they didn't go. Any time you like.
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: turbonium1
They are threatening him with legal action because he lied to them, accuses them of fraud and intends to make money out of the resulting footage.
They were lied to, accused of fraud, and profited from showing it on film.
You think that's why they threatened to sue him. They didn't sue him, which is quite a problem for your argument..
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: turbonium1
Threatening to sue Sibrel, and threatening to kill Sibrel , was really just to get Sibrel to leave the house faster.
It makes perfect sense...
Not.
some americans wont ask, they will just get their guns..
Yes, they are called nut-jobs. They will shoot someone who is trying to leave their property, and afterwards, they explain to the police how they shot trespassers who refused to leave their property.
For some reason, nobody buys that as an excuse for blasting someone's head off, and they end up guilty of first-degree murder. Perhaps if they didn't kill them in the driveway, it'd be more convincing!
a reply to: onebigmonkey
Got any proof that Aldrin or Mitchell didn't walk on the moon? Get back to me when you have.
originally posted by: Misinformation
a reply to: onebigmonkey
Got any proof that Aldrin or Mitchell didn't walk on the moon? Get back to me when you have.
computer models have Moon hoax theory gaining overwhelming validity, while the propagandists are trending towards zero credibility ...
originally posted by: Misinformation
a reply to: onebigmonkey
Got any proof that Aldrin or Mitchell didn't walk on the moon? Get back to me when you have.
computer models have Moon hoax theory gaining overwhelming validity, while the propagandists are trending towards zero credibility ...
The Apollo Defenders have a hard time coming to grips with the real historical narrative of Nixon's Apollo. Any questions?
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
a reply to: DJW001
DJW, I want those other 999 questions posted to this thread in 48 hours. It is very important that you substantiate your claim of having "thousands" of questions. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt by only asking you for another 999 questions.. which would only bring you to a mere 1,000. I am not requiring you to have multiple "thousands" just one thousand.
Your claim was "Thousands." of questions that you had. I am calling your bluff on this hand, DJW001. I'd like you to just fold this hand right now. I know that you are bluffing because you don't have another 999 questions.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
a reply to: DJW001
DJW, I want those other 999 questions posted to this thread in 48 hours. It is very important that you substantiate your claim of having "thousands" of questions. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt by only asking you for another 999 questions.. which would only bring you to a mere 1,000. I am not requiring you to have multiple "thousands" just one thousand.
Your claim was "Thousands." of questions that you had. I am calling your bluff on this hand, DJW001. I'd like you to just fold this hand right now. I know that you are bluffing because you don't have another 999 questions.
Answer the first question and I will post the second. Once you have answered 1,999 questions you will see for yourself that I am not bluffing, you are. Now answer the first question please.