It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Disclosure of the Moon Landing Hoax: Part 2

page: 54
17
<< 51  52  53    55  56  57 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 21 2015 @ 04:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Ove38
The missing original Apollo 11 video tapes is clear evidence of fakery, the truth is being hidden.

...So basically your claiming because we don't have backup tapes the mission was faked....


No, because we don't have the original tapes !


...if you are referring to the video footage, why is the original so important when video footage has been freely available since they first aired during the Apollo missions..


Of course I am referring to the original video tapes, that would be historical evidence.




posted on May, 21 2015 @ 04:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38


Of course I am referring to the original video tapes, that would be historical evidence.


Only if they confirmed your prejudices; otherwise, they are just fake.



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 04:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Ove38
The missing original Apollo 11 video tapes is clear evidence of fakery, the truth is being hidden.

...So basically your claiming because we don't have backup tapes the mission was faked....


No, because we don't have the original tapes !


They have the original tapes the telemetry tapes were backup tapes on case of loss of the live feed. The originals were the televised video. This is what Houston stored. What Houston didn't know is the video before scan was better quality. Luckily the recording station noticed and had the video captured on super 8 as well. We have that tape And you do see a diffrence from the broadcast version. Not as dark so as I said go check them out.

Does this prove anyrhing well yes it does it proved it was a live recording after all if it was filmed in a studio they would have had a master to make scans from. That means the TV broadcast would have looked just like TV shows at the time.



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 05:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Ove38
The missing original Apollo 11 video tapes is clear evidence of fakery, the truth is being hidden.

...So basically your claiming because we don't have backup tapes the mission was faked....


No, because we don't have the original tapes !


They have the original tapes ...


They do not !

"NASA personnel continue to sift through 37-year-old records in their attempt to locate the magnetic tapes that recorded the original Apollo 11 video in 1969."

www.nasa.gov...



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 05:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

why are the numerous other copies no good enough for you ??????

the missing tapes are NOT the sole 1st generation copies of this material - they are BACKUPS you do realise that

further - the BACKUP tapes of other missions are availiable - so whats " wrong " with them ???????????????



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 06:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38

why are the numerous other copies no good enough for you ??????


Where is your copy of the missing original tapes ? A video camera pointed at a 10-inch TV monitor, is not a copy ! A copy is identical to the original tape, do you have that ?
edit on 21-5-2015 by Ove38 because: text fix



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 06:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

just WTF ????????????


wheres my copy
?

is that the best you can do ???????????????????????

i do not own a copy of shakespears 1st folio

but i do have a 1965 copy of his " collected works "

does that make the 1st foloi a fake // hoax ??????????????

the " logic " of hoax believers has really taken a nose dive recently

but hey - can i offer you some reall advice - enrole in a critical thinking class or a foundation course in formal logic

this is not an insult - you do need it



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 06:27 AM
link   
I see you have no argument.

You don't have the original tapes, you don't have a copy of the original tapes, you don't have a copy of the copy of the original tapes, of man's greatest achievement !? a bit sloppy don't you think so ?
edit on 21-5-2015 by Ove38 because: text fix



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 06:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

the flaw in your "thinking" is that what you call :


the origional tape


isnt - now thats sloppy

as for lack of argument - please answer all my questions fro the last 4 pages of this thread

i am done with this crap for today - out to have fun



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38

the flaw in your "thinking" is that what you call :

"the origional tape"

isnt - now thats sloppy



I call ? I got it from NASAs web page www.nasa.gov...

BTW: they probably never existed

edit on 21-5-2015 by Ove38 because: link fix



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 08:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Ove38
The missing original Apollo 11 video tapes is clear evidence of fakery, the truth is being hidden.

...So basically your claiming because we don't have backup tapes the mission was faked....


No, because we don't have the original tapes !


...if you are referring to the video footage, why is the original so important when video footage has been freely available since they first aired during the Apollo missions..


Of course I am referring to the original video tapes, that would be historical evidence.


and whats wrong with existing footage?? footage that people have been watching since they first aired?? are they vastly different from the originals?



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 09:42 AM
link   
a reply to: choos

I think the point is we will probably never know.



posted on May, 21 2015 @ 11:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Ove38
The missing original Apollo 11 video tapes is clear evidence of fakery, the truth is being hidden.

...So basically your claiming because we don't have backup tapes the mission was faked....


No, because we don't have the original tapes !


...if you are referring to the video footage, why is the original so important when video footage has been freely available since they first aired during the Apollo missions..


Of course I am referring to the original video tapes, that would be historical evidence.


and whats wrong with existing footage?? footage that people have been watching since they first aired?? are they vastly different from the originals?


Your "footage" was a video camera pointed at a 10-inch TV monitor.




posted on May, 22 2015 @ 12:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ove38
I see you have no argument.

You don't have the original tapes, you don't have a copy of the original tapes, you don't have a copy of the copy of the original tapes, of man's greatest achievement !? a bit sloppy don't you think so ?


NASA kept a lot of items under strict security like negatives, moon rocks, moon suits, moon boots, moon helmets, etc. But they did NOT bring back any of the dozens of Hasselblad cameras and they made sure to sweep up all the telemetry tapes so that the tapes could never be examined... by anyone... ever. The Defenders will always try to down play the significant loss of the Apollo 11 tapes.

14-tracks of original telemetry data, including the SSTV track, gone forever.

Ove38 I'm sure you know this already but there was/is a project to re-examine the Lunar Orbiter tapes which were saved for 50 years. The LO tapes survived half a century not because of anything NASA did. The tapes were saved by someone else.


" in 1986, the decision of whether to scrap the tapes became the responsibility of JPL archivist Nancy Evans. She decided that the tapes should be preserved. She recalled, "I could not morally get rid of this stuff". Source
en.wikipedia.org...


Obviously, Nancy Evans had the good sense and sanity to preserve the history. Richard Nafzger, on the other hand, was the guy accepting the Emmy Award for his Apollo production it should have been Nafzger's responsibility to hold the original SSTV tapes for posterity. Instead, he just waves his hands and says Oops, we probably erased them!

Oops. NASA's moon rock audits are the source of "extreme disagreements".


Oops. Alan Bean points his expensive color television camera into a reflection of the sun destroying the innards. Not satisfied with sizzling the camera, Bean then takes a hammer and smashing it until parts are falling off!




posted on May, 22 2015 @ 12:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ove38
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Marcus Allen !


Let's add Dave McGowan from Wagging the Moondoggie
www.davesweb.cnchost.com...

Salute to all the Apollo Reviewers out there including Richard Hoagland, John Lear, Jay Weidner, Rob Ager, John Logsdon, Mark Feeney, William Cooper, Bill Kaysing, Ralph René, Thomas Baron and his family, Gus Grissom and his family, Bart Sibrel, Jack White, David Percy, and many, many more.


edit on 5/22/2015 by SayonaraJupiter because: (no reason given)

edit on 5/22/2015 by SayonaraJupiter because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 22 2015 @ 03:39 AM
link   
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

If NASA is so incompetent, how were they able to manage such a complex hoax and keep it secret for so long?



posted on May, 22 2015 @ 03:42 AM
link   
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

the argument of missing tapes ONLY applies to the apollo 11 mission - so does that mean you accept the veracity of A 12 ~ 17 ? because the pack up tapes for those are availiable

lastly - your other " arguments " have nothing to do with the veracity of the apollo program



posted on May, 22 2015 @ 03:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

and what about the 8mm and 16mm cine footage ?????????????

and the backups made in australia and the UK ???????????

and all the other media of apollo mission activity ????????????



posted on May, 22 2015 @ 06:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Ove38
The missing original Apollo 11 video tapes is clear evidence of fakery, the truth is being hidden.

...So basically your claiming because we don't have backup tapes the mission was faked....


No, because we don't have the original tapes !


...if you are referring to the video footage, why is the original so important when video footage has been freely available since they first aired during the Apollo missions..


Of course I am referring to the original video tapes, that would be historical evidence.


and whats wrong with existing footage?? footage that people have been watching since they first aired?? are they vastly different from the originals?


Your "footage" was a video camera pointed at a 10-inch TV monitor.



and so is that footage vastly different in content than the original?


originally posted by: bobbypurify
I think the point is we will probably never know.


even if we dont know, why did they have original content that was completely different from the aired content??

why not just have one content of poor quality and later upgraded to better quality?? why do hoax believers seem to want to believe that there was two different footages with different content?



posted on May, 22 2015 @ 09:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

If NASA is so incompetent, how were they able to manage such a complex hoax and keep it secret for so long?


It's no secret, there's a dozen documentaries and thousands of web pages about it. Here's one from Award Winning Documentary filmmaker Aron Ranen, it's called "Did we go ?"


edit on 22-5-2015 by Ove38 because: text fix




top topics



 
17
<< 51  52  53    55  56  57 >>

log in

join