It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Disclosure of the Moon Landing Hoax: Part 2

page: 36
17
<< 33  34  35    37  38  39 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 12 2015 @ 10:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38


and how do you test things ?

HINT : test pilots

amazingly - all 3 apollo 11 crew were test pilots


ETA :

does this mean that you accept that apollo 12 ~ 17 were manned missions ?

I did not say the flights were umanned, the men just didn't land on the moon inside the lunar lander.



apollo.mem-tek.com...
edit on 12-5-2015 by Ove38 because: text fix




posted on May, 12 2015 @ 10:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Ove38
You don't seem to understand the importance of success in the Apollo project, no one could die, they just had to fake it. There was no one in the Landing Module (LM)


What are you talking about test pilots risk their lives all the time. And that is exactly who Apollo picked for astronauts. Doest take a brain surgeon to figure out why.So you think they are going to spend all that money to send up empty capsules.That has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard wow.


Do you think they would land it, with somebody on board, before test landing it ? no chance !


So... if something has never been done before it is impossible to do? Because no-one ever ran the mile in under four minutes since the invention of the stopwatch, all the modern Olympic records are fake?

You know they would have to test land it first, and they did.



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 10:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38


and how do you test things ?

HINT : test pilots

amazingly - all 3 apollo 11 crew were test pilots


ETA :

does this mean that you accept that apollo 12 ~ 17 were manned missions ?

I did not say the flights were umanned, the men just didn't land on the moon inside the lunar lander.



apollo.mem-tek.com...


Amazing, there really are all kinds of special on the hoax side.
So they flew to the Moon and landed the LEM remotely from lunar orbit... because it was 'dangerous'..?

Were there two sets of astronauts then? The movie stars and the ones who flew the LEM to the Moon to land it remotely from orbit? Who was where?

Allow me to respond to that in a way appropriate for the level of this and any Moon hoax conversation:



Such a shame that the Internet won't ever be withdrawn from the masses and returned to it's original purpose of connecting educational institutions.. In fact it's ironic that something designed to transport cutting edge ideas and data is now consigned to this sort of garbage. I really think that some sort of IQ and common sense tests should be used to grant access at the bare minimum instead of profits taking priority and letting anyone on.



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 10:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

You do know that Apollo 10 went around the moon right?

Seeing as you posted a photograph from Apollo 9, here's a question for you to consider:

What are the two most dangerous parts of the Apollo missions?

Clue: Apollo 7 and 9 also did them.



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

I think it's very telling that you crowbar in made up nudge-nudge-wink-wink nonsense about Kubrick's alleged involvement with Apollo, but completely ignore my previous post about Chinese and Indian evidence supporting Apollo. Why don't you want to address that?



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 10:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: AgentSmith
Amazing, there really are all kinds of special on the hoax side.
So they flew to the Moon and landed the LEM remotely from lunar orbit... because it was 'dangerous'..?

Were there two sets of astronauts then? The movie stars and the ones who flew the LEM to the Moon to land it remotely from orbit? Who was where?

Landing and take of with the LEM had never been tested, the flights were test flights, not the real missions.



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: Ove38

You do know that Apollo 10 went around the moon right?

Seeing as you posted a photograph from Apollo 9, here's a question for you to consider:

What are the two most dangerous parts of the Apollo missions?


Take of from the moon and returning to earth



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 10:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: Ove38

I think it's very telling that you crowbar in made up nudge-nudge-wink-wink nonsense about Kubrick's alleged involvement with Apollo, but completely ignore my previous post about Chinese and Indian evidence supporting Apollo. Why don't you want to address that?


Your pictures in that post doesn't show on my computer, do they show NASA bootprints ?
edit on 12-5-2015 by Ove38 because: text fix



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: AgentSmith
Amazing, there really are all kinds of special on the hoax side.
So they flew to the Moon and landed the LEM remotely from lunar orbit... because it was 'dangerous'..?

Were there two sets of astronauts then? The movie stars and the ones who flew the LEM to the Moon to land it remotely from orbit? Who was where?

Landing and take of with the LEM had never been tested, the flights were test flights, not the real missions.


They tested and practiced the principles on Earth. At some point every aircraft takes to the skies for the first time and since we started building aircraft and spaceships it has usually been with a human in the cockpit. You do know about test pilots in history and today? Thanks to science and engineering we can largely predict the behaviour of a craft and someone always has to be the first to try it regardless. The astronauts were test pilots used to this kind of thing and they practiced the techniques on Earth as best as possible.




posted on May, 12 2015 @ 10:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: AgentSmith

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: AgentSmith
Amazing, there really are all kinds of special on the hoax side.
So they flew to the Moon and landed the LEM remotely from lunar orbit... because it was 'dangerous'..?

Were there two sets of astronauts then? The movie stars and the ones who flew the LEM to the Moon to land it remotely from orbit? Who was where?

Landing and take of with the LEM had never been tested, the flights were test flights, not the real missions.


They tested and practiced the principles on Earth. At some point every aircraft takes to the skies for the first time and since we started building aircraft and spaceships it has usually been with a human in the cockpit. You do know about test pilots in history and today? Thanks to science and engineering we can largely predict the behaviour of a craft and someone always has to be the first to try it regardless. The astronauts were test pilots used to this kind of thing and they practiced the techniques on Earth as best as possible.





At 2:40 you see why they dident try this on the moon



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

ok - lets try it another way - suposing an hypothetical idiot accepts your claim that the apollo 11 LEM was unmanned

did this aledged unmaned LEM make a suscessfull remote controled landing and take off from the moon ?

and if it did - do you accept that LEM capability is now tested ?

so was the apollo 12 LEM manned - and did apollo 12 ~ 17 missions land men on the moon

its a simple question - a yes or no answer will do

with the caveat if no - why ????????????????????????????/



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: AgentSmith

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: AgentSmith
Amazing, there really are all kinds of special on the hoax side.
So they flew to the Moon and landed the LEM remotely from lunar orbit... because it was 'dangerous'..?

Were there two sets of astronauts then? The movie stars and the ones who flew the LEM to the Moon to land it remotely from orbit? Who was where?

Landing and take of with the LEM had never been tested, the flights were test flights, not the real missions.


They tested and practiced the principles on Earth. At some point every aircraft takes to the skies for the first time and since we started building aircraft and spaceships it has usually been with a human in the cockpit. You do know about test pilots in history and today? Thanks to science and engineering we can largely predict the behaviour of a craft and someone always has to be the first to try it regardless. The astronauts were test pilots used to this kind of thing and they practiced the techniques on Earth as best as possible.





At 2:40 you see why they dident try this on the moon


No, at 2:40 you see why they practiced, practiced, practiced before trying it on the Moon.

If they had anything to gain and desired to carry out what you say - then they would have just told it how it was like with the previous practice missions! I really think some of you people are so desperate to find a conspiracy in it that your brains switch off or something..



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 11:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38

ok - lets try it another way - suposing an hypothetical idiot accepts your claim that the apollo 11 LEM was unmanned

did this aledged unmaned LEM make a suscessfull remote controled landing and take off from the moon ?

and if it did - do you accept that LEM capability is now tested ?

Landing looks ok, but no take off, don't think they tried that on Apollo 11 maybe on a later test flight ?



apollo.mem-tek.com...



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 11:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

oh FFS - now you are just taking the piss - are you really claiming that you dont know that the LEM separated on take off - leaving the " bottom half " behind ????

this ladies and gentlemen is the calibre of hoax believers , are they :

a ] grossly incompetant ?

b ] utterly dishonest ?



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 11:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

How very convenient for you.



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 11:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38

oh FFS - now you are just taking the piss - are you really claiming that you dont know that the LEM separated on take off - leaving the " bottom half " behind ????

this ladies and gentlemen is the calibre of hoax believers , are they :

a ] grossly incompetant ?

b ] utterly dishonest ?


I don't see the bottom half I see the complete LM and thats all.



apollo.mem-tek.com...
edit on 12-5-2015 by Ove38 because: text fix



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 11:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38

oh FFS - now you are just taking the piss - are you really claiming that you dont know that the LEM separated on take off - leaving the " bottom half " behind ????

this ladies and gentlemen is the calibre of hoax believers , are they :

a ] grossly incompetant ?

b ] utterly dishonest ?


I did wonder if that was why he kept posting the picture, but wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt... Oh well!



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 11:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: Ove38

How very convenient for you.


Why dont you just repost them or give the links ?



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: AgentSmith


"Project Morpheus"


undoubtedly the propagandists consumed a significant quantity of the blue pills & immediately experienced complications ...



edit on 12-5-2015 by Misinformation because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 12 2015 @ 12:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

Why not just right click and copy the url.

Why not put some effort into what you are trying to defend? I did.



new topics




 
17
<< 33  34  35    37  38  39 >>

log in

join