It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Disclosure of the Moon Landing Hoax: Part 2

page: 29
17
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 8 2015 @ 12:41 AM
link   
Do you know why George Low was the acting NASA administrator for 8 months after Tom Paine left and nobody else wanted the job??????

They looked all over and nobody wanted the job.

That is your narrative now deal with it.




posted on May, 8 2015 @ 12:58 AM
link   
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

im pretty sure everybody accepts that richard nixon was the active president during Apollo 11 - 17..

no one is saying otherwise, its not that nobody is interested in your topics although some probably are, its more that you are stating the obvious, nothing what you say has anything to do with a moon landing hoax..

you are borderline off topic.



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 01:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

And a simple reading of tthe a oral history shows that it it was a simple wiring error caused by confusion between US and Australian systems.

Your use of 'explosion' is a little bit exaggerated. He does use the term 'blew up', but imo it is figurative, not literal, given what he says before that. It was also 3 months before launch - hardly last ast minute.

The rest of his history is very interesting. People who don't understand how the TV signal got to Earth and then to their TVs would do well to read it.


Wrong. The SSTV equipment was sabotaged by a workman who decided to change the black and red leads on the SSTV power convertor. This was 3 weeks prior to the Apollo 11 launch. That makes you wrong on two counts.
edit on 5/8/2015 by SayonaraJupiter because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 01:06 AM
link   
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

so HOW did this facilitate a hoax ?



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 02:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

so HOW did this facilitate a hoax ?


It doesn't unless your crazy and have a weird infatuation with Richard Nixon. But see he has to get the story back to Nixon so he can spam the thread with his pictures.



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 04:14 AM
link   
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

You have absolutely no proof whatsoever that this the case. It is a made up fantasy.

Also, your PM to me was deleted unread. Do not send me any more. If you do, I will report you.
edit on 8-5-2015 by onebigmonkey because: typo



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 04:27 AM
link   
a reply to: SayonaraJupiterI



remember it was a weekend, and for some reason, we weren’t allowed to work there. I don’t know if it was because it was Sunday or a Saturday, or we had a day off. Whatever it was, we were off and came in the next Monday morning. We came in, and I was in charge, and they said, “Dick, turn on the converter.” I turned it on and that smoke came flying out of it. Relays were flapping all over the place. I turned it off, but it was too late. It blew up about $100,000 worth of equipment. We’re three months before launch and we’re trying to figure out what happened.


Three months.
edit on 8-5-2015 by onebigmonkey because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 05:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38

whats your explaination for it ?

I don't know ? What we today call "Photoshop layers" is the first thing that comes to my mind ! This would then be "bad photoshopping" !?




edit on 8-5-2015 by Ove38 because: text fix



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 06:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38
Suggest you learn how the camera worked then you wont look kind of silly when its explained to YOU .
(on mobile)

If you are old enough you will remember seeing ghost images on tv, this been explained before on here an is yet another example of how certain people never see things happen in the world around them!!!
edit on 8-5-2015 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 06:51 AM
link   
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter


I make a motion that you, or any other Apollo Defender, satisfy the other readers of this thread, by submitting the complete provenance and chain of custody for that film. I seriously doubt that you can handle it.


Suddenly you've become a lawyer. You've gone from accepting a misprint in a newspaper as "evidence" to rejecting first person testimony and demanding an evidedntiary chain for a piece of videotape. That's right, the sequence in question is video, not film. There is ample documentation available of how the transmission was sent to Earth and received by a radio-telescope in Australia where there are still many people who were present in the room when it was received and beamed to a communications satellite for transmission to the Unites States and the rest of the world.

www.parkes.atnf.csiro.au...

Of course, that's not good enough for you because it doesn't implicate Richard Nixon, right? On the other hand, any crazy theory that it was really faked on a gigantic vacuum soundstage, for which there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever, carries equal weight in your eyes because you can then conclude that Nixon was behind it all.

You have no clue how historiography works.
edit on 8-5-2015 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 06:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
Do you know why George Low was the acting NASA administrator for 8 months after Tom Paine left and nobody else wanted the job??????

They looked all over and nobody wanted the job.

That is your narrative now deal with it.


Would you want to run an agency that had recently had a major setback in racing to meet the most important deadline of the Cold War? Your knowledge of human nature is as feeble as your grasp of historiography.



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 06:57 AM
link   

a reply to: onebigmonkey
your PM to me was deleted unread. Do not send me any more. If you do, I will report you


undoubtedly an effort towards blatantly disappearing potentially embarrassing material into the memory hole ...

the SSTV equipment sabotaged was obviously an endeavor by the propagandists too obstruct the facilities from distinguishing the origin of the covert sources capable of generating the deceptive apollo electronic communications in preparations for the nefarious hoax operations...



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 07:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: Ove38
Suggest you learn how the camera worked then you wont look kind of silly when its explained to YOU .
(on mobile)

If you are old enough you will remember seeing ghost images on tv, this been explained before on here an is yet another example of how certain people never see things happen in the world around them!!!


Jimi Hendrix, live on german tv in 1967, nobody is transparent

www.youtube.com...



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 08:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: Ove38
Suggest you learn how the camera worked then you wont look kind of silly when its explained to YOU .
(on mobile)

If you are old enough you will remember seeing ghost images on tv, this been explained before on here an is yet another example of how certain people never see things happen in the world around them!!!


Jimi Hendrix, live on german tv in 1967, nobody is transparent

www.youtube.com...


Wow! How unobservant are you? Look closely at Jimi's hand in the very first shot! It strobes and is briefly transparent! Look at the drumsticks! They look like a spread out set of a dozen transparent drumsticks at times. Thank you for proving yourself wrong.


edit on 8-5-2015 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 08:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Misinformation

No. It was to stop receiving unwanted spam. I object to it, just as I object to you making me a 'friend' so you can keep track of what I post.

The SSTV was repaired in plenty of time and it never happened again. Some sabotage.

Nothing about the LRV wheels yet from you I see. I can only assume your claims to having some were false.



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 08:21 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Can you still frame his head being transparent? I can't see what you're seeing. Thanks!



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 08:45 AM
link   

a reply to: wmd_2008
this been explained before on here


only tentatively speculative explanations based upon propagandists conjecture ...



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 09:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: DJW001

Can you still frame his head being transparent? I can't see what you're seeing. Thanks!








An audience of ghosts!



See-through drumsticks AND A SEE THROUGH HEAD!



Of course, Dutch TV used PAL, which had a much, much higher scanning rate than the slow scan system used on Apollo 11.




posted on May, 8 2015 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

If he doesn't understand scan rates and broadcasting it's probably a teenager grew up in the digital age and doesn't understand analog and why we switched over to digital broadcasts lol.



posted on May, 8 2015 @ 09:29 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Sigh, you've captured motion blur. Do you have any pictures of entire torsos with the background visible through them? This is rather amateur. Not that Ove's video proves anything but your comparisons are insulting



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join