It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Disclosure of the Moon Landing Hoax: Part 2

page: 26
17
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 5 2015 @ 09:03 AM
link   

a reply to: onebigmonkey
post what you have or shut up


ok, ok, relax , have patience ,it will all be available in my moon manifesto ...




posted on May, 5 2015 @ 10:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
....The smearing on the reseau plate is absolutely not a spill, it is very obviously a smear that has dried, and could be on the magazine itself, the lens or the plate. He claims to identify when the smear occurred (and may well be correct) but there is self-evidently no liquid involved in the footage he shows....

He may well be correct about the sound to. How come the sound of hammer strikes are heard through the space suits on the "moon" in 1969 but not through the space suits on the International Space Station (ISS) today ?


edit on 5-5-2015 by Ove38 because: text fix



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 10:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

Except he isn't. The first EVA video I looked at for the ISS you could clearly hear sounds from vibrations travelling to the suit mic.

Posting from my phone so no link - try this thing called google.



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 11:09 AM
link   
a reply to: onebigmonkey

Well, then there's testimony from the people that work on the ISS that actually say there's no sound - at all in the vacuum of space, even citing banging things together that would normally produce sound. So, what are they talking about?



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 11:11 AM
link   
a reply to: bobbypurify

Sound requires a medium to travel through. In space itself there is no medium. When an object hits the suit, or the station, there's a medium to travel through.



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 11:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Apparently, you didn't watch the video. Go to around the 48' mark or so and they may have some captured sound that would defy what we know about vacuums!



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 11:41 AM
link   
a reply to: bobbypurify

The sound traveled through the LEM, and was picked up by a microphone on the LEM.



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 11:42 AM
link   
a reply to: bobbypurify

Here is a link directly to 48:46 minute mark
edit on 5-5-2015 by webstra because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Apollo record states all microphones were stored inside the LEM. The only mics were inside their oxygen-filled helmets, unless you can prove the video otherwise.



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 11:53 AM
link   
a reply to: bobbypurify


All of the Apollo spacecraft included onboard voice recorders, activated during much of each mission to record the crew's conversations. The transcripts of those recordings were publicly released in the mid-1970s and they have been posted on the Internet for years. But only recently were the actual onboard recordings from Apollo 11 digitized so that the recordings could be made available on the Internet.

The Apollo 11 Onboard Audio Tape Database cross references the tape numbers to the Mission Elapsed Time (MET) that was on each tape. The database includes a description of the mission status at that time. It is best to listen to the tapes while simultaneously viewing the same mission elapsed time on the transcript, since often the recordings are faint.

The digitized recordings are available here in the same form as they were recorded during the mission. As a result, they are noisy with technical interference that occurred during their recording and transmission. They are sometimes garbled and sometimes have long periods of no voice. They are not listed in chronological order but rather in the order that data was dumped onto storage tapes during the mission. A single tape may include recordings from several different periods of the mission.

www.nasa.gov...



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 12:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Was that mic on when the chamber door was open on the surface and were we getting fed that transmission?



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 12:15 PM
link   
a reply to: bobbypurify

It doesn't say anywhere, just that it was on "for most of the mission". But it would be easy enough to forget to turn it off while getting ready to go out onto the surface.



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

The very first moon rock gift was given, with much fanfare, by Spiro Agnew to President Marcos of the Philippines on December 31, 1969.

articles.orlandosentinel.com...

www.gov.ph...

So there is no way that a moon rock was given away by the US ambassador almost three months earlier, on October 9. It would have been huge news.



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 12:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Then the LEM mic would surely pick up other sounds, like the ladder descent or the opening of the hatch, all of the compartments and attachments (ie moon rover) etc would all be sound transferred to that medium straight to the onboard microphone. I believe we both have some studying to do as the video certainly made a profound observation.


Thanks for the link and research



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 04:29 PM
link   
a reply to: bobbypurify


First couple I came across:

youtu.be...

youtu.be...


edit on 5-5-2015 by onebigmonkey because: replying to correct post



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 04:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: webstra
a reply to: bobbypurify

Here is a link directly to 48:46 minute mark


And what you can see there is that his hand is resting on something that is in contact with the Mesa Table. The sound is conducted through the LM structure to his hand and then to the suit mic.



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: onebigmonkey

The first vid is over an hour long, can you tell me where to hear the noise picked up by the mic?

The second vid, well, it sounded more like a lot of interference than a sound in the vacuum of space. Again, which part?



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 11:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Rob48
a reply to: turbonium1

The very first moon rock gift was given, with much fanfare, by Spiro Agnew to President Marcos of the Philippines on December 31, 1969.

articles.orlandosentinel.com...

www.gov.ph...

So there is no way that a moon rock was given away by the US ambassador almost three months earlier, on October 9. It would have been huge news.



That pretty much slams the door shut on the Dutch Fake Moon Rock. All of Richard Nixon's "gift rocks" were encased in acrylic hockey pucks or semi-spheres. Thank you Rob for bringing an end to the DFMR diversion.
edit on 5/5/2015 by SayonaraJupiter because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 11:11 PM
link   
a reply to: bobbypurify

They are linked to relevant parts.



posted on May, 6 2015 @ 06:23 AM
link   
a reply to: onebigmonkey

No, not on my end there not. There's no noise in the second video other than interference. The first video starts at the beginning of an hour long video. What do you hear make noise?

And, you say the noise of the strap hitting the LEM is from the astros mic while another poster states it's from a mic inside the LEM. Hmmmm, yours requires me to believe that sound traveled through so many mediums...




new topics




 
17
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join