It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: choos
middendorf was named.. but Drees was not named.. kind of strange that the receiver of the gift isnt on the plaque at all..
yea one of only two people, of which only one remains alive, so basically he can claim whatever he wants..
that only middendorf can confirm..
originally posted by: turbonium1
As nobody else was there, except the late Mr. Drees, only Middendorf CAN confirm the story.
You say he must be a liar, without any evidence of lying.
The account seems quite sincere, and certainly nothing to indicate, or even to suggest, that he is lying.
He is not lying, no matter how desperately you wish him to be.
originally posted by: AgentSmith
Odd behaviour, not sure how psychologists would classify it but completely unhelpful to anyone.
a reply to: onebigmonkey
No-one says he's lying, just elderly and confused.
originally posted by: wmd_2008
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: DelMarvel
At the times that this footage was shown, TV was grainy and nobody had home recorders (or very few). Plus, everything was broadcast from a screen and most of the public did not view the entire Apollo catalogue of photos. Now, the Internet came along and that's when I believe photos were starting to become manipulated.
I mean, it doesn't look like the moon to me and many others. The photos look fake. The videos look fake. The rover is silly. But, it's unpatriotic to doubt the veracity of Apollo so it's like swimming upstream trying to have an honest discussion about this.
It doesn't matter about the TV IMAGES still images were taken on 70mm film with Hasselblad cameras and the resolution of those images are better than HD or 4K !
The images look fake to YOU we have already seen that most HOAX believers & the so called experts hoax believer web sits use DON'T understand how photography works, prime example trying to show parallax errors from images shot to make a panorama.
Here is China's ChangE 3 video
So what are your thoughts now
originally posted by: zatara
a reply to: bobbypurify
I have a question which is bugging me for some time now... Maybe you, or someone else can give me a satisfying answer.
The question is why other space going nations do not blow the lid of the hoax. Russia is able to tell us if the Apollo cabin with its crew was able to pass the Van Allen radiation belts. I mean, these guys must have data about those belts and combined with the data of the cabin construction they should be able to say to the world that the USA technology is based on a lie...or not. Or countries with powerfull telescopes could take a look at the landing sites to see if there are these Apollo remains present.
Any idea?
thx a lot..
originally posted by: zatara
a reply to: bobbypurify
I have a question which is bugging me for some time now... Maybe you, or someone else can give me a satisfying answer.
The question is why other space going nations do not blow the lid of the hoax. Russia is able to tell us if the Apollo cabin with its crew was able to pass the Van Allen radiation belts. I mean, these guys must have data about those belts and combined with the data of the cabin construction they should be able to say to the world that the USA technology is based on a lie...or not.
Or countries with powerfull telescopes could take a look at the landing sites to see if there are these Apollo remains present.
originally posted by: choos
im not saying he MUST be a liar.. im saying there is a possiblity of it.. you are the one who is dead set on him being completely clean..
originally posted by: choos
you mean apart from giving Mr Drees petrified wood and a commemoration card which has no indication of having any affiliation with the petrified rock apart from being in the same drawer??
originally posted by: choos
no where on the card does it say its a rock, no where on the card does it say its for Mr Drees, no where on the card does it mention the word gift, the rock had no protection whatsoever from the elements, no where in the Apollo 11 sample list is there anything remotely similar to the petrified wood, the only moon rock at the time on display was behind glass in the smithsonian..
originally posted by: choos
why should they feel an obligation to give a moon rock to Mr Drees during the goodwill tour and NOT the Queen??
originally posted by: choos
Mr Drees had bad eyesight and hard of hearing..
originally posted by: choos
given all of these facts, you can safely judge with certainty that Middendorf had only the purest of intentions and gave Mr Drees a supposedly priceless rock with no strings attached..
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
originally posted by: zatara
a reply to: bobbypurify
I have a question which is bugging me for some time now... Maybe you, or someone else can give me a satisfying answer.
The question is why other space going nations do not blow the lid of the hoax. Russia is able to tell us if the Apollo cabin with its crew was able to pass the Van Allen radiation belts. I mean, these guys must have data about those belts and combined with the data of the cabin construction they should be able to say to the world that the USA technology is based on a lie...or not.
We do have massive amounts of data on the VAB from both NASA and non-NASA sources. As well as doing their own work on the belts at the same time as Van Allen, the Soviets sent live specimens around the moon and back in a Zond probe, and India's recent Chandrayaan probe collected radiation data on the way to the moon. Surveyor and Lunar Orbiter probes also collected data.
None of them found data that contradicted the data from Apollo, or that cast doubt on a human's ability to pass through the belts.
Not one single person claiming that Apollo missions did not happen has ever been able to demonstrate that the astronauts would have received a fatal dose of radiation given the length of time they were in the belts and the trajectory they took.
Or countries with powerfull telescopes could take a look at the landing sites to see if there are these Apollo remains present.
There isn't a telescope powerful enough to view the landing sites with that level of detail - the mirrors required would need to be enormous.
China, India and Japan have all taken photographs of Apollo landing sites and confirm not just the surface features shown by Apollo images (ones that were not known about before Apollo), but also evidence of Apollo activity on the surface. They support the US LRO probe's photographs of the landing sites completely.
originally posted by: Ove38
China, India and Japan have all taken photographs of ......Apollo activity on the surface.
Now why would you need make up something like that ?
China, India and Japan have all taken photographs of Apollo landing sites and confirm not just the surface features shown by Apollo images (ones that were not known about before Apollo), but also evidence of Apollo activity on the surface
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
...Chandrayaan and Japan's Kaguya probe have both imaged surface alteration at Hadley Rille as a result of the LM engine. This has been published in scientific papers and has also been referenced in the Apollo threads here.
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: Ove38
You do understand that when you have that same LM photographed and broadcast on live TV on the moon in the presence of astronauts, and with surface features not known about before that LM landed, and with time and date specific images of Earth photographed from the moon and broadcast live on TV, and where a rocket was launched with those astronauts in it, and with every stage of the mission broadcast on TV, and with rocks brought back from the moon by those astronauts, and with scientific instruments transmitting data back from the moon in the places shown in the photos and on TV, that your claim begins to look a little desperate?
How do you know it's the same LM ? How do you know it was broadcasted from the moon ? BTW moon rocks don't look like that ! they look like this
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Ove38
How do you know it's the same LM ? How do you know it was broadcasted from the moon ? BTW moon rocks don't look like that ! they look like this
How do you know the Chinese Yutu rover is really on the Moon? How do you know you are not a butterfly dreaming you are a man?